"uhhh no"
"scientists aren't smart"
These aren't arguments. Like common TL, we used to be better than this.
Forum Index > General Forum |
Little-Chimp
Canada948 Posts
"uhhh no" "scientists aren't smart" These aren't arguments. Like common TL, we used to be better than this. | ||
FluffyBinLaden
United States527 Posts
| ||
FallDownMarigold
United States3710 Posts
PHILADELPHIA, December 20, 2013 A new study conducted by Drexel University environmental sociologist Robert J. Brulle, PhD, exposes the organizational underpinnings and funding behind the powerful climate change countermovement. This study marks the first peer-reviewed, comprehensive analysis ever conducted of the sources of funding that maintain the denial effort. Through an analysis of the financial structure of the organizations that constitute the core of the countermovement and their sources of monetary support, Brulle found that, while the largest and most consistent funders behind the countermovement are a number of well-known conservative foundations, the majority of donations are “dark money,” or concealed funding. The data also indicates that Koch Industries and ExxonMobil, two of the largest supporters of climate science denial, have recently pulled back from publicly funding countermovement organizations. Coinciding with the decline in traceable funding, the amount of funding given to countermovement organizations through third party pass-through foundations like Donors Trust and Donors Capital, whose funders cannot be traced, has risen dramatically. Brulle, a professor of sociology and environmental science in Drexel’s College of Arts and Sciences, conducted the study during a year-long fellowship at Stanford University’s Center for Advanced Study in the Behavioral Sciences. The study was published today in Climatic Change, one of the top 10 climate science journals in the world. ![]() ![]() http://www.drexel.edu/now/news-media/releases/archive/2013/December/Climate-Change/ Not terribly surprising. Thought it was funny that Koch + Exxon are wary of their intellectually embarrassing positions | ||
Zato-1
Chile4253 Posts
On September 27 2013 22:56 AUFKLARUNG wrote: Key Metrics Characterizing Anthropogenic Climate Change Equilibrium climate sensitivity is likely in the range 2°C–4.5°C, and very likely above 1.5°C. The most likely value is near 3°C. Equilibrium climate sensitivity greater than about 6°C–7°C is very unlikely. The total amount of anthropogenic emissions of long-lived greenhouse gases largely determines the warming in the 21st century. The global mean warming per 1000 PgC is very likely between 0.8°C–3°C. This is the only part that sounds like bullshit to me, TBH. I've read plenty of literature from both the IPCC and dissenting climatologists, and as far as I can tell the 3°C sensitivity figure is a fairly dramatic exaggeration (or miscalculation, or outright lie depending on what you ascribe the motive to); in fact, I'd be surprised if the net feedback effect is positive at all. That said, people who deny any man-made warming whatsoever are either ignorant, misinformed or liars; of this we should all agree by now. | ||
Acertos
France852 Posts
If you add to that the other developping countries like China or India which don't give two shits about nature preservation, it's certain that we polute more today than during the first and second industrial revolution (1800-1914). Yes you can argue that we ain't sure that humans are the primary causes of global warming, so we shouldn't believe this theory but then you are just being a stupid doubter, everything in Science is based on suppositions and the theory of pole changes seem way less solid and extemely suspicious (if we follow that theory, we should be in a period of constant change of polarity that should last between 1000-10k yrs, and sorry but my compass still works) in comparison to studies on human role in the state of the planet. To me this climate change denial is the same as the genocides denial, creationism, you can't argue with people about that because even if everything tends to prove that they are wrong, they have the support of some pseudo science and history stuides. Studies that are often funded by people who want to keep their interests (be it political, influencial or commercial). Aside from that the numbers of the supposed increase in temperature seem a little high and the post about the fundings from FallDownMarigold totally prove my point: these studies were funded by these industrials and indivuduals who have interests in not changing anything in their customs, they don't give two shit about the planet so trusting studies made by them is completely retarded. | ||
Amaroq64
United States75 Posts
On December 25 2013 02:22 FallDownMarigold wrote: This is the most recently bumped thread concerning climate change, so.... Figured I'd post this little set of FunFactz here rather than shit out an entire new thread: Show nested quote + PHILADELPHIA, December 20, 2013 A new study conducted by Drexel University environmental sociologist Robert J. Brulle, PhD, exposes the organizational underpinnings and funding behind the powerful climate change countermovement. This study marks the first peer-reviewed, comprehensive analysis ever conducted of the sources of funding that maintain the denial effort. Through an analysis of the financial structure of the organizations that constitute the core of the countermovement and their sources of monetary support, Brulle found that, while the largest and most consistent funders behind the countermovement are a number of well-known conservative foundations, the majority of donations are “dark money,” or concealed funding. The data also indicates that Koch Industries and ExxonMobil, two of the largest supporters of climate science denial, have recently pulled back from publicly funding countermovement organizations. Coinciding with the decline in traceable funding, the amount of funding given to countermovement organizations through third party pass-through foundations like Donors Trust and Donors Capital, whose funders cannot be traced, has risen dramatically. Brulle, a professor of sociology and environmental science in Drexel’s College of Arts and Sciences, conducted the study during a year-long fellowship at Stanford University’s Center for Advanced Study in the Behavioral Sciences. The study was published today in Climatic Change, one of the top 10 climate science journals in the world. [Big-ass images about the funding of "denial".] http://www.drexel.edu/now/news-media/releases/archive/2013/December/Climate-Change/ Not terribly surprising. Thought it was funny that Koch + Exxon are wary of their intellectually embarrassing positions Right-wingers fund global warming denial, and Left-wingers fund global warming alarmism. What else is new? All of this hubbub about humans affecting global warming is for a political purpose. Right-wingers want to leave us alone in the economy and control what we do in the bedroom, and Left-wingers want to leave us alone in the bedroom and control what we do in the economy. That's what all of this is implying. That human economic action needs to be restrained in order to "save the planet". But you know what the real solution is? Leave the market free so creative/inventive people can come up with solutions to whatever global changes we may or may not be facing. What's the solution to polution, you may ask? Individual rights. Primarily your right to life and right to property. If someone poisons your land, water, or your body, take them to court. That's the free-market solution to pollution. If green energy is so great, let it compete on the free market. Get both left-wing and right-wing political influence out of the market so that the best man truly wins. Then innovation can happen and things can change for the better. We humans have come this far. Americans from the shirts on our backs to the industrial revolution to the sprawling, technologically advanced society we have today, thanks to Capitalism. Just let that work and you'll see whatever innovations we need. | ||
IgnE
United States7681 Posts
On December 27 2013 18:04 Amaroq64 wrote: Show nested quote + On December 25 2013 02:22 FallDownMarigold wrote: This is the most recently bumped thread concerning climate change, so.... Figured I'd post this little set of FunFactz here rather than shit out an entire new thread: PHILADELPHIA, December 20, 2013 A new study conducted by Drexel University environmental sociologist Robert J. Brulle, PhD, exposes the organizational underpinnings and funding behind the powerful climate change countermovement. This study marks the first peer-reviewed, comprehensive analysis ever conducted of the sources of funding that maintain the denial effort. Through an analysis of the financial structure of the organizations that constitute the core of the countermovement and their sources of monetary support, Brulle found that, while the largest and most consistent funders behind the countermovement are a number of well-known conservative foundations, the majority of donations are “dark money,” or concealed funding. The data also indicates that Koch Industries and ExxonMobil, two of the largest supporters of climate science denial, have recently pulled back from publicly funding countermovement organizations. Coinciding with the decline in traceable funding, the amount of funding given to countermovement organizations through third party pass-through foundations like Donors Trust and Donors Capital, whose funders cannot be traced, has risen dramatically. Brulle, a professor of sociology and environmental science in Drexel’s College of Arts and Sciences, conducted the study during a year-long fellowship at Stanford University’s Center for Advanced Study in the Behavioral Sciences. The study was published today in Climatic Change, one of the top 10 climate science journals in the world. [Big-ass images about the funding of "denial".] http://www.drexel.edu/now/news-media/releases/archive/2013/December/Climate-Change/ Not terribly surprising. Thought it was funny that Koch + Exxon are wary of their intellectually embarrassing positions Right-wingers fund global warming denial, and Left-wingers fund global warming alarmism. What else is new? All of this hubbub about humans affecting global warming is for a political purpose. Right-wingers want to leave us alone in the economy and control what we do in the bedroom, and Left-wingers want to leave us alone in the bedroom and control what we do in the economy. That's what all of this is implying. That human economic action needs to be restrained in order to "save the planet". But you know what the real solution is? Leave the market free so creative/inventive people can come up with solutions to whatever global changes we may or may not be facing. What's the solution to polution, you may ask? Individual rights. Primarily your right to life and right to property. If someone poisons your land, water, or your body, take them to court. That's the free-market solution to pollution. If green energy is so great, let it compete on the free market. Get both left-wing and right-wing political influence out of the market so that the best man truly wins. Then innovation can happen and things can change for the better. We humans have come this far. Americans from the shirts on our backs to the industrial revolution to the sprawling, technologically advanced society we have today, thanks to Capitalism. Just let that work and you'll see whatever innovations we need. 10/10 troll post. | ||
| ||
![]() StarCraft 2 StarCraft: Brood War Dota 2 League of Legends Counter-Strike Other Games summit1g11143 singsing1747 C9.Mang0944 hungrybox512 Tasteless204 JuggernautJason136 Skadoodle107 Nina68 semphis_46 Organizations Other Games StarCraft 2 StarCraft: Brood War StarCraft 2 StarCraft: Brood War
StarCraft 2 • Berry_CruncH265 StarCraft: Brood War• practicex ![]() • v1n1z1o ![]() • IndyKCrew ![]() • AfreecaTV YouTube • sooper7s • intothetv ![]() • Kozan • LaughNgamezSOOP • Laughngamez YouTube • Migwel ![]() Dota 2 League of Legends Other Games |
PiG Sty Festival
Clem vs Bunny
Solar vs Zoun
Replay Cast
BSL Nation Wars 2
Korean StarCraft League
PiG Sty Festival
herO vs Rogue
ByuN vs SKillous
SC Evo Complete
[BSL 2025] Weekly
Online Event
Replay Cast
SOOP Global
ByuN vs Zoun
Rogue vs Bunny
[ Show More ] PiG Sty Festival
MaxPax vs Classic
Dark vs Maru
Sparkling Tuna Cup
BSL Nation Wars 2
Online Event
The PondCast
|
|