EPTShooting of Trayvon Martin - Page 276
| Forum Index > General Forum |
This is a sensitive and complex issue, please do not make comments without first reading the facts, which are cataloged in the OP. If you make an uninformed post, or one that isn't relevant to the discussion, you will be moderated. If in doubt, don't post. | ||
|
dAPhREAk
Nauru12397 Posts
| ||
|
xDaunt
United States17988 Posts
| ||
|
FatChicksUnited
Canada214 Posts
On July 06 2013 04:02 dAPhREAk wrote: did the parents take the stand? Mother and older brother did, before Bao. | ||
|
dAPhREAk
Nauru12397 Posts
On July 06 2013 04:03 FatChicksUnited wrote: Mother and older brother did, before Bao. they said its trayvon's voice? anything else? | ||
|
Kaitlin
United States2958 Posts
On July 06 2013 04:02 xDaunt wrote: Bao is just not fit for giving expert testimony in court. He's the exact opposite of what a prosecuting attorney wants on the stand. Fixed. | ||
|
FatChicksUnited
Canada214 Posts
On July 06 2013 04:03 dAPhREAk wrote: they said its trayvon's voice? anything else? I didn't see it. Someone told me it was very simple, yes it was his voice etc. | ||
|
Kaitlin
United States2958 Posts
On July 06 2013 04:03 dAPhREAk wrote: they said its trayvon's voice? anything else? I only saw highlights and the only other thing TV showed was when BDLR asked if she had any children and where were they, she said "Trayvon Benjamin Martin" and that he's in heaven. | ||
|
Kaitlin
United States2958 Posts
| ||
|
Kaitlin
United States2958 Posts
| ||
|
dAPhREAk
Nauru12397 Posts
jesus christ, there were like 15 people in the room when mother first heard the tape. i pity the fool who denies its trayvon's voice in that crowd. | ||
|
xDaunt
United States17988 Posts
| ||
|
FatChicksUnited
Canada214 Posts
On July 06 2013 04:18 xDaunt wrote: I'm kinda surprised that the prosecution and defense didn't get their shit together and figure out how far away the weather station was ahead of time. It's 2013, how does it take more than 3 minutes to find this information on the internet? | ||
|
dAPhREAk
Nauru12397 Posts
| ||
|
FatChicksUnited
Canada214 Posts
| ||
|
xDaunt
United States17988 Posts
On July 06 2013 04:22 dAPhREAk wrote: is he making a motion for directed verdict? i was watching the mother vod. Yeah. Looks like the standard is that all evidence must be view in the light most favorable to the state. The motion will be denied on that standard. EDIT: O'Mara is arguing a very nuanced point about circumstantial versus direct evidence and rebutting a claim of self-defense and he seems to be relying upon case law that supports his position. He may have a better basis for the motion than I thought. We'll see though. | ||
|
Sabu113
United States11084 Posts
| ||
|
xDaunt
United States17988 Posts
| ||
|
GreenHorizons
United States23932 Posts
| ||
|
dAPhREAk
Nauru12397 Posts
On July 06 2013 04:29 GreenHorizons wrote: Did O'Mara just suggest that just punching GZ in the nose was enough for GZ to shoot Trayvon? no | ||
|
GreenHorizons
United States23932 Posts
So when he said "I believe that act alone( in reference to the confrontation and the first blow) would be enough to justify the use of deadly force" He was misspeaking? | ||
| ||
