EPTI really hope it's like D2LOD, would be alot of fun!
Diablo III - Page 20
| Forum Index > General Games |
|
NiGoL
1868 Posts
I really hope it's like D2LOD, would be alot of fun! | ||
|
hoby2000
United States918 Posts
On June 28 2008 21:51 Famehunter wrote: LMAO at witch doctors... whats next? Demon hunters? LOL ! I'm reviving this thread for 2 reasons: 1. The dude I quote.... WTF. Hahahahahahaha. 2. I have a google search thingy that reports back to me daily about new things that may have popped up about the game. This article came up: Fired Blizzard tester hands out Diablo 3 spoilers I'm not going to quote anything, or even spoiler just because I know people will want to read for themselves or won't want to read anything at all. Pretty interesting though.... The dude says his contract said nothing about being able to spill beans, but I find that highly unlikely. I don't see how Blizzard would have a loop hole for a tester to be able to legally tell everyone what is in, and what isn't in the game. Sounds like a hoax to me... | ||
|
Zeles
United States335 Posts
On April 18 2011 06:23 hoby2000 wrote: I'm reviving this thread for 2 reasons: 1. The dude I quote.... WTF. Hahahahahahaha. 2. I have a google search thingy that reports back to me daily about new things that may have popped up about the game. This article came up: Fired Blizzard tester hands out Diablo 3 spoilers I'm not going to quote anything, or even spoiler just because I know people will want to read for themselves or won't want to read anything at all. Pretty interesting though.... The dude says his contract said nothing about being able to spill beans, but I find that highly unlikely. I don't see how Blizzard would have a loop hole for a tester to be able to legally tell everyone what is in, and what isn't in the game. Sounds like a hoax to me... its definitely fake 100% certain | ||
|
Luiwtf
England217 Posts
On April 18 2011 06:23 hoby2000 wrote: I'm reviving this thread for 2 reasons: 1. The dude I quote.... WTF. Hahahahahahaha. 2. I have a google search thingy that reports back to me daily about new things that may have popped up about the game. This article came up: Fired Blizzard tester hands out Diablo 3 spoilers I'm not going to quote anything, or even spoiler just because I know people will want to read for themselves or won't want to read anything at all. Pretty interesting though.... The dude says his contract said nothing about being able to spill beans, but I find that highly unlikely. I don't see how Blizzard would have a loop hole for a tester to be able to legally tell everyone what is in, and what isn't in the game. Sounds like a hoax to me... Not clicking the link, don't want spoilers :D. He probably didn't understand all those long words in the NDA, so thinks he can say what he wants about it :p. If people were actually free to talk about it I'd imagine spoilers would be everywhere. Either that or it's fake  . | ||
|
SoundProof
Sweden99 Posts
On April 18 2011 06:23 hoby2000 wrote: I'm reviving this thread for 2 reasons: 1. The dude I quote.... WTF. Hahahahahahaha. 2. I have a google search thingy that reports back to me daily about new things that may have popped up about the game. This article came up: Fired Blizzard tester hands out Diablo 3 spoilers I'm not going to quote anything, or even spoiler just because I know people will want to read for themselves or won't want to read anything at all. Pretty interesting though.... The dude says his contract said nothing about being able to spill beans, but I find that highly unlikely. I don't see how Blizzard would have a loop hole for a tester to be able to legally tell everyone what is in, and what isn't in the game. Sounds like a hoax to me... Cites 4chan as the source... really? | ||
|
maneatingshoe
Canada484 Posts
On April 18 2011 06:23 hoby2000 wrote: I'm reviving this thread for 2 reasons: 1. The dude I quote.... WTF. Hahahahahahaha. 2. I have a google search thingy that reports back to me daily about new things that may have popped up about the game. This article came up: Fired Blizzard tester hands out Diablo 3 spoilers I'm not going to quote anything, or even spoiler just because I know people will want to read for themselves or won't want to read anything at all. Pretty interesting though.... The dude says his contract said nothing about being able to spill beans, but I find that highly unlikely. I don't see how Blizzard would have a loop hole for a tester to be able to legally tell everyone what is in, and what isn't in the game. Sounds like a hoax to me... This guy is a cunt I can see why they fired him. Pessimistic asshole | ||
|
Ideas
United States8178 Posts
On April 18 2011 06:23 hoby2000 wrote: I'm reviving this thread for 2 reasons: 1. The dude I quote.... WTF. Hahahahahahaha. 2. I have a google search thingy that reports back to me daily about new things that may have popped up about the game. This article came up: Fired Blizzard tester hands out Diablo 3 spoilers I'm not going to quote anything, or even spoiler just because I know people will want to read for themselves or won't want to read anything at all. Pretty interesting though.... The dude says his contract said nothing about being able to spill beans, but I find that highly unlikely. I don't see how Blizzard would have a loop hole for a tester to be able to legally tell everyone what is in, and what isn't in the game. Sounds like a hoax to me... yea a lot of his answers werent very specific or seemed like "he HAD to of had worked there to answer that question in that way..." like he would just say "oh class X is imba right now.." which means nothing since presumably balance is always changing in development or "the boss fights sucked because they were really scripted" which was a retarded answer because all boss fights in all games are pretty scripted nowadays. i think he's a fake | ||
|
hoby2000
United States918 Posts
The dude posted it all on 4chan... which makes the whole situation even more fishy. But he has some interesting details about the game's story. I guess we'll see how it all pans out come release time. I honestly thought the dude I quoted was more interesting than that article... I mean, come on. Coincidence or not... still fucking weird. | ||
|
Sulli
Canada236 Posts
who has the most say in art direction on the team? the most say is always from the team that makes the interface with the stock holders Come on now. The only way he could describe the game was saying how boring it was and making non-specific comparisons to Torchlight. Even if he was real, he wouldn't have been of any value to Blizzard testing the game. | ||
|
FinestHour
United States18466 Posts
| ||
|
Mahs
Netherlands171 Posts
| ||
|
iloveav
Poland1483 Posts
Diablo 3 seems like a console game for me so far. Diablo 2, i remmber the first time i played it. And i found out my necromancer in single player trying to beat andariel. Was Epic, after years, i still ike to use my now godlike charaters for fun. I really doubt Diablo3 will get su much improvement. Since WoW and Their unification with EA, a lot of stuff is starting to look "un-blizzard" like. Personally i dont like it, but they are getting more sales like this so i really dont think they care for a minority like me. | ||
|
Roeder
Denmark735 Posts
Troll is OK troll. | ||
|
zJayy962
1363 Posts
On April 18 2011 07:01 switchdev wrote: I stopped reading the Q&A right at the start where he says they'll be porting the game to consoles. How obvious is he making it. Sadly I see this as a possibility if Activision wants to expand the D3 market. | ||
|
KiLL_ORdeR
United States1518 Posts
| ||
|
sqrt
1210 Posts
On April 18 2011 06:23 hoby2000 wrote: 2. I have a google search thingy that reports back to me daily about new things that may have popped up about the game. This article came up: Fired Blizzard tester hands out Diablo 3 spoilers The dude is a fake, just read the Titan part, he's trying too hard to troll. On April 18 2011 07:15 iloveav wrote: Diablo1 and Diablo2 was like going from Doom to Deus Ex, or Baldurs Gate to Baldurs Gate2. Diablo 3 seems like a console game for me so far. Diablo 2, i remmber the first time i played it. And i found out my necromancer in single player trying to beat andariel. Was Epic, after years, i still ike to use my now godlike charaters for fun. I really doubt Diablo3 will get su much improvement. Since WoW and Their unification with EA, a lot of stuff is starting to look "un-blizzard" like. Personally i dont like it, but they are getting more sales like this so i really dont think they care for a minority like me. Diablo 3 looks like a Diablo, seems to play like a Diablo; if it looks like a duck, sounds like a duck than it's... Everything revealed at this point shows improvement in gameplay, the classes, while not the old ones, sound like a blast. You're being too negative, I'm sure you'll have as much fun with the Witch Doctor as you had with the Necromancer. And yes, there is a console port planned AFTER release, no worries. Not to mention that most Blizz games are on consoles. + Show Spoiler + The merge was with Activision and they are operating independently. | ||
|
thehitman
1105 Posts
On June 28 2008 21:51 Famehunter wrote: LMAO at witch doctors... whats next? Demon hunters? LOL ! wow, you are so right sir. There is the demon hunter now. How did you guess? Is Blizzard so obvious? | ||
|
TheKanAry
United States149 Posts
On June 28 2008 21:51 Famehunter wrote: LMAO at witch doctors... whats next? Demon hunters? LOL ! .....Does this guy at least win a T-shirt? "I called blizzards secret fifth class and all i got was this lousy T-shirt."? | ||
|
DKo
United States187 Posts
 | ||
|
Spawkuring
United States755 Posts
Everything else is just knowledge most people could guess from what Blizzard has released so far. Blizzard has already hinted that they are considering consoles. They have also hinted that their new MMO is going to be heavy on social/community building. And anyone who has read a Blizzard story in their life could guess that Tyreal might be corrupted since Blizzard is obsessed with corruption stories. Not at all convinced by that. | ||
| ||
