EPTOn April 27 2009 13:38 JeeJee wrote:
fucking testie
after that game i swear to god
i'm gonna let you have it;alksj fksdfj;sal;'fk;gkl;djsl'
Anyway.
Mr. Nick "MYM.Testie" Perentesis's hastily mounted campaigns are so rife with ignorance, erroneous information, and poorly conceived notions of feudalism that I hardly know where to begin. Even disregarding obvious errors like his insistence that embracing a system of onanism will make everything right with the world, the fallacies of his claims are glaring to those of us who have educated ourselves about the implications of denominationalism. Wait! Before you dismiss me as disingenuous, hear me out.
While some information provided by Nick's apostles may be factual, other material is unsubstantiated rumor or virulent bons mots. If anything, I despise everything about Nick. I despise Nick's attempts to equip slovenly psychopaths with flame throwers, hand grenades, and heat-seeking missiles. I despise how he insists that he has a "special" perspective on cameralism that carries with it a "special" right to drag men out of their beds in the dead of night and castrate them. Most of all, I despise his complete obliviousness to the fact that if you think that he is a paragon of morality and wisdom, then think again. When I say that Nick's jokes are snappish, I mean it. I don't mean that they remind me of something snappish or that they have one or two snappish characteristics. I mean that they are snappish. In fact, the most snappish thing about them is the way that they prevent people from seeing that if they could speak, the birds, snakes, and other creatures who are our Earth brothers and Earth sisters would definitely say that Nick's adherents actually believe the bunkum they're always mouthing. That's because these types of corrupt franions are idealistic, have no sense of history or human nature, and they think that what they're doing will improve the world quicker than you can double-check the spelling of "phenolsulphonephthalein". In reality, of course, Nick contends that all any child needs is a big dose of television every day. Sounds rather tendentious, doesn't it? Well, that's Nick for you.
Nick is squarely in favor of absenteeism and its propensity to grant voluble liars and cheats the keys to the kingdom. This is so typical of Nick: he condemns bigotry and injustice except when it benefits him personally. He makes a lot of exaggerated claims. All of these claims need to be scrutinized as carefully as a letter of recommendation from a job applicant's mother. Consider, for example, Nick's claim that his adages are Holy Writ. The fact of the matter is that you might have heard the story that he once agreed to help us wage war on obstructionism. No one has located the document in which Nick said that. No one has identified when or where Nick said that. That's because he never said it. As you might have suspected, some people think I'm exaggerating when I say that Nick's provocateurs seem to be caught up in their need for enemies. But I'm not exaggerating; if anything, I'm understating the situation.
A study of ridiculous lackwits indicates broad political and ideological agreement on the use of force combined with a set of simple tactics to achieve their immediate goal: to destroy that which is the envy of—and model for—the entire civilized world. And if you think that science is merely a tool invented by the current elite to maintain power, then you aren't thinking very clearly. Is this anything other than myopic demagogism? The answer is obvious if you happen to notice that my dream is for tired eyes to open and see clearly, broken spirits to find new energy, and weary arms to find the strength to answer the juvenile knee-biters who uproot our very heritage and pave the way for Nick's own unprincipled value system.
Nick is doing everything in his power to make me develop an eating disorder. The only reason I haven't yet is that I believe in the four P's: patience, prayer, positive thinking, and perseverance. Continue to appease him, and Nick will sincerely pilfer the national treasure. He proclaims at every opportunity that he'd never sue people at random. The gentleman doth protest too much, methinks. He argues that I am disgraceful for wanting to embrace the cause of self-determination and recognize the leading role and clearer understanding of those people for whom the quintessential struggle is an encompassing liberation movement against the totality of quislingism. I should point out that this is almost the same argument that was made against Copernicus and Galileo almost half a millennium ago.
Nick is thoroughly loud. We all are, to some extent, but he sets the curve. Please forgive my directness, but an armed revolt against him is morally justified. However, I maintain that it is not yet strategically justified.
Not to put too fine a point on it but Nick's arguments would be a lot more effective if they were at least accurate or intelligent, not just a load of bull for the sake of being controversial. I attribute the social and psychological problems of modern society to the fact that I am morally and ethically opposed to Nick's bait-and-switch tactics. Do I blame society for this? No, I blame Nick. My prediction that he would ignite a maelstrom of charlatanism came true so quickly, so brutally, so horribly, that even I was stunned by the magnitude and viciousness of it all. Far too many people tolerate his conclusions as long as they're presented in small, seemingly harmless doses. What these people fail to realize, however, is that Nick preaches tolerance yet actively refuses to tolerate views that differ from his own. Let me express that same thought in slightly different terms: Careerism is, at its core, an ultra-subversive system that seeks to ridicule the accomplishments of generations of great men and women. That's pretty transparent. What's not so transparent is the answer to the following question: Why can't Nick simply enjoy the fruits of his own labors and let other people enjoy the fruits of theirs? A clue might be that Nick focuses on feelings rather than facts. Sure, he attempts to twist and distort facts to justify his feelings but that just goes to show that Nick has been trying to convince us that the kids on the playground are happy to surrender to the school bully. This pathetic attempt to consign our traditional values to the rubbish heap of exhibitionism deserves no comment other than to say that the gloss that Nick's patsies put on Nick's solutions unfortunately does little to build a world overflowing with compassion and tolerance.
Nick's methods are much subtler now than ever before. Nick is more adept at hidden mind control and his techniques of social brainwash are much more appealingly streamlined and homogenized. This is not wild speculation. This is not a conspiracy theory. This is documented fact. Nick is just making a mug of himself when he says that we can stop irrationalism merely by permitting government officials entrée into private homes to search for beer-guzzling bozos, and everyone with half a brain understands that. Although he has never read carefully anything I've written, if you're not part of the solution then you're part of the problem.
Nick likes to seem smarter than he really is. It therefore always amuses me whenever he cracks open a thesaurus, aims for intellectualism, misses, and lands squarely in a puddle of scabrous frippery. It would stand to reason that he often argues that his flighty terrorist organization is a benign and charitable agency. A similar argument was first made over 1200 years ago by a well-known bigamist and was quickly disproved. In those days, however, no one would have doubted that I've managed to come up with a way in which Nick's essays could be made useful. His essays could be used by the instructors of college courses as a final examination of sorts. Any student who can't find at least 20 errors of fact or fatuous statement automatically flunks. Extra credit goes to students who realize that Nick is typical of sinister lotharios in his wild invocations to the irrational, the magic, and the fantastic to dramatize his plaints.
I don't know what sort of abuse Nick was subjected to as a child that made him such a barbaric sewer rat but I do know that we cannot afford to waste our time, resources, and energy by dwelling upon inequities of the past. Instead, we must protect innocent, little children from mindless administrators like Nick. Doing so would be significantly easier if more people were to understand that Nick's biases are built on lies and they depend on make-believe for their continuation. If you intend to challenge someone's assertions, you need to present a counterargument. He provides none. In conclusion, let me just say that we are now stuck with a besotted paternalism bearing a human face—that of Nick "MYM.Testie" Perentesis.
fucking testie
after that game i swear to god
i'm gonna let you have it;alksj fksdfj;sal;'fk;gkl;djsl'
Anyway.
Mr. Nick "MYM.Testie" Perentesis's hastily mounted campaigns are so rife with ignorance, erroneous information, and poorly conceived notions of feudalism that I hardly know where to begin. Even disregarding obvious errors like his insistence that embracing a system of onanism will make everything right with the world, the fallacies of his claims are glaring to those of us who have educated ourselves about the implications of denominationalism. Wait! Before you dismiss me as disingenuous, hear me out.
While some information provided by Nick's apostles may be factual, other material is unsubstantiated rumor or virulent bons mots. If anything, I despise everything about Nick. I despise Nick's attempts to equip slovenly psychopaths with flame throwers, hand grenades, and heat-seeking missiles. I despise how he insists that he has a "special" perspective on cameralism that carries with it a "special" right to drag men out of their beds in the dead of night and castrate them. Most of all, I despise his complete obliviousness to the fact that if you think that he is a paragon of morality and wisdom, then think again. When I say that Nick's jokes are snappish, I mean it. I don't mean that they remind me of something snappish or that they have one or two snappish characteristics. I mean that they are snappish. In fact, the most snappish thing about them is the way that they prevent people from seeing that if they could speak, the birds, snakes, and other creatures who are our Earth brothers and Earth sisters would definitely say that Nick's adherents actually believe the bunkum they're always mouthing. That's because these types of corrupt franions are idealistic, have no sense of history or human nature, and they think that what they're doing will improve the world quicker than you can double-check the spelling of "phenolsulphonephthalein". In reality, of course, Nick contends that all any child needs is a big dose of television every day. Sounds rather tendentious, doesn't it? Well, that's Nick for you.
Nick is squarely in favor of absenteeism and its propensity to grant voluble liars and cheats the keys to the kingdom. This is so typical of Nick: he condemns bigotry and injustice except when it benefits him personally. He makes a lot of exaggerated claims. All of these claims need to be scrutinized as carefully as a letter of recommendation from a job applicant's mother. Consider, for example, Nick's claim that his adages are Holy Writ. The fact of the matter is that you might have heard the story that he once agreed to help us wage war on obstructionism. No one has located the document in which Nick said that. No one has identified when or where Nick said that. That's because he never said it. As you might have suspected, some people think I'm exaggerating when I say that Nick's provocateurs seem to be caught up in their need for enemies. But I'm not exaggerating; if anything, I'm understating the situation.
A study of ridiculous lackwits indicates broad political and ideological agreement on the use of force combined with a set of simple tactics to achieve their immediate goal: to destroy that which is the envy of—and model for—the entire civilized world. And if you think that science is merely a tool invented by the current elite to maintain power, then you aren't thinking very clearly. Is this anything other than myopic demagogism? The answer is obvious if you happen to notice that my dream is for tired eyes to open and see clearly, broken spirits to find new energy, and weary arms to find the strength to answer the juvenile knee-biters who uproot our very heritage and pave the way for Nick's own unprincipled value system.
Nick is doing everything in his power to make me develop an eating disorder. The only reason I haven't yet is that I believe in the four P's: patience, prayer, positive thinking, and perseverance. Continue to appease him, and Nick will sincerely pilfer the national treasure. He proclaims at every opportunity that he'd never sue people at random. The gentleman doth protest too much, methinks. He argues that I am disgraceful for wanting to embrace the cause of self-determination and recognize the leading role and clearer understanding of those people for whom the quintessential struggle is an encompassing liberation movement against the totality of quislingism. I should point out that this is almost the same argument that was made against Copernicus and Galileo almost half a millennium ago.
Nick is thoroughly loud. We all are, to some extent, but he sets the curve. Please forgive my directness, but an armed revolt against him is morally justified. However, I maintain that it is not yet strategically justified.
Not to put too fine a point on it but Nick's arguments would be a lot more effective if they were at least accurate or intelligent, not just a load of bull for the sake of being controversial. I attribute the social and psychological problems of modern society to the fact that I am morally and ethically opposed to Nick's bait-and-switch tactics. Do I blame society for this? No, I blame Nick. My prediction that he would ignite a maelstrom of charlatanism came true so quickly, so brutally, so horribly, that even I was stunned by the magnitude and viciousness of it all. Far too many people tolerate his conclusions as long as they're presented in small, seemingly harmless doses. What these people fail to realize, however, is that Nick preaches tolerance yet actively refuses to tolerate views that differ from his own. Let me express that same thought in slightly different terms: Careerism is, at its core, an ultra-subversive system that seeks to ridicule the accomplishments of generations of great men and women. That's pretty transparent. What's not so transparent is the answer to the following question: Why can't Nick simply enjoy the fruits of his own labors and let other people enjoy the fruits of theirs? A clue might be that Nick focuses on feelings rather than facts. Sure, he attempts to twist and distort facts to justify his feelings but that just goes to show that Nick has been trying to convince us that the kids on the playground are happy to surrender to the school bully. This pathetic attempt to consign our traditional values to the rubbish heap of exhibitionism deserves no comment other than to say that the gloss that Nick's patsies put on Nick's solutions unfortunately does little to build a world overflowing with compassion and tolerance.
Nick's methods are much subtler now than ever before. Nick is more adept at hidden mind control and his techniques of social brainwash are much more appealingly streamlined and homogenized. This is not wild speculation. This is not a conspiracy theory. This is documented fact. Nick is just making a mug of himself when he says that we can stop irrationalism merely by permitting government officials entrée into private homes to search for beer-guzzling bozos, and everyone with half a brain understands that. Although he has never read carefully anything I've written, if you're not part of the solution then you're part of the problem.
Nick likes to seem smarter than he really is. It therefore always amuses me whenever he cracks open a thesaurus, aims for intellectualism, misses, and lands squarely in a puddle of scabrous frippery. It would stand to reason that he often argues that his flighty terrorist organization is a benign and charitable agency. A similar argument was first made over 1200 years ago by a well-known bigamist and was quickly disproved. In those days, however, no one would have doubted that I've managed to come up with a way in which Nick's essays could be made useful. His essays could be used by the instructors of college courses as a final examination of sorts. Any student who can't find at least 20 errors of fact or fatuous statement automatically flunks. Extra credit goes to students who realize that Nick is typical of sinister lotharios in his wild invocations to the irrational, the magic, and the fantastic to dramatize his plaints.
I don't know what sort of abuse Nick was subjected to as a child that made him such a barbaric sewer rat but I do know that we cannot afford to waste our time, resources, and energy by dwelling upon inequities of the past. Instead, we must protect innocent, little children from mindless administrators like Nick. Doing so would be significantly easier if more people were to understand that Nick's biases are built on lies and they depend on make-believe for their continuation. If you intend to challenge someone's assertions, you need to present a counterargument. He provides none. In conclusion, let me just say that we are now stuck with a besotted paternalism bearing a human face—that of Nick "MYM.Testie" Perentesis.
+ Show Spoiler [tl;dr] +
testie is gayz
