EPTHaving said that, their plan on capturing the dead to bring to Cersei is absolutely ridiculous and I hate it. I can't believe of all routes they could go, that's where they're heading.
[TV] HBO Game of Thrones - Page 1667
| Forum Index > Media & Entertainment |
All book discussion in this thread is now allowed. | ||
|
crms
United States11933 Posts
Having said that, their plan on capturing the dead to bring to Cersei is absolutely ridiculous and I hate it. I can't believe of all routes they could go, that's where they're heading. | ||
739
Bearded Elder29903 Posts
| ||
|
EleanorRIgby
Canada3923 Posts
| ||
|
[sc1f]eonzerg
Belgium6761 Posts
| ||
|
TheTenthDoc
United States9561 Posts
On August 19 2017 07:04 EleanorRIgby wrote: the armistice and going to meet cersei is pretty dumb, they should deal with her as quickly as possible and then deal with the night king. cersei will obviously betray dany the first chance she gets and make it more difficult for them to defeat the night king in the long run. What's odd is that "the long run" here is only the long run in terms of the show, not actual in-show time. They're spending a month or more on this wight plan (even though teleportation doesn't make it look that way). That's a long-ass time where Jon still hasn't touched base with the North, Cersei will be plotting and building her forces with mercenaries (I think they know about the gold?), and the Night King will get even closer. | ||
|
ShAsTa
Belgium2841 Posts
| ||
|
JGwinworth
45 Posts
On August 19 2017 21:24 ShAsTa wrote: Jon Snow seems to want to keep his death and resurrection a secret. But if he doesn't want to mention it, how does he explain that he's no longer in the Night's Watch and seems to have broken his vow (which is punishable by death as we saw in season 1)? What do you mean how does he explain? Um, he died, end of conversation. | ||
|
Plansix
United States60190 Posts
| ||
|
Cricketer12
United States13990 Posts
On August 19 2017 22:16 JGwinworth wrote: What do you mean how does he explain? Um, he died, end of conversation. ...did you not read his post. Also as Edd mentioned "this night and all the nights to come". Even if everyone knew he died some would still expect him to serve nw | ||
|
Hyperbola
United States2544 Posts
On August 19 2017 23:18 Plansix wrote: So the dragons are warm blooded right? They have to be, they are huge. They spit napalm, but that isn't going to keep them warm. Reptiles are cold blooded. Warm blooded means you maintain a constant internal temperature. | ||
|
Plansix
United States60190 Posts
On August 20 2017 03:21 Hyperbola wrote: Reptiles are cold blooded. Warm blooded means you maintain a constant internal temperature. Thank you. I know how science works for normal, non physics defying flying lizards that shoot napalm. | ||
|
Odoakar
Croatia1837 Posts
| ||
KwarK
United States43232 Posts
On August 20 2017 04:35 Odoakar wrote: Spoilers for e6 are not permitted even if tagged with spoilers? Correct. | ||
|
BluzMan
Russian Federation4235 Posts
On August 20 2017 03:21 Hyperbola wrote: Reptiles are cold blooded. Warm blooded means you maintain a constant internal temperature. Most reptiles not extinct are cold-blooded. Not all and many dinosaurs are suspected to have been warm-blooded too. So it could go either way with dragons. | ||
|
B.I.G.
3251 Posts
| ||
|
ShAsTa
Belgium2841 Posts
On August 19 2017 22:16 JGwinworth wrote: What do you mean how does he explain? Um, he died, end of conversation. I mean if he doesn't want to say he died. When Jon and Davos met with Daenerys, he stopped Davos when he starting talking about taking a knife in the heart. So my question is: if Jon, in general, to people, does not like to mention he died, how does he explain he's no longer in the Night's Watch (seeing as you're supposed to serve for the rest of your life)? | ||
|
{CC}StealthBlue
United States41117 Posts
Not much is known about the different “Game of Thrones” spinoffs in development in HBO, though it has been confirmed that all four are prequels and will feature no existing characters. Courtesy of an IGN interview with Jane Goldman, who’s writing one of the proposed spinoffs, we now know that hers will be “recognizable as a past event” to those familiar with Westeros. Though she emphasizes that she “can say absolutely nothing” in terms of plot details, the “Kick-Ass” screenwriter responds in the affirmative when asked if her spinoff will feature any magic or supernatural elements. Goldman is developing the show alongside George R. R. Martin, and says that she’s “had the pleasure of going to spend some time with him and working on things and talking about ideas and that was an honor and a pleasure. He’s a great guy and we’ve had enormous fun talking about ideas and characters and all sorts of interesting things.” Many fans have speculated that Robert’s Rebellion might serve as source material for one of the potential prequel series, ditto the Doom of Valyria. Goldman confirms that only one of the spinoffs will ultimately be made into a series; she also hints that she may know how “Game of Thrones” itself ends: “I totally should not answer that question!” is her coy response when asked. Read the full interview here. Source | ||
|
Odoakar
Croatia1837 Posts
 | ||
|
Dav1oN
Ukraine3164 Posts
 we'll have lots of things to discuss | ||
|
CorsairHero
Canada9491 Posts
| ||
| ||
