EPTUS Politics Mega-thread - Page 1449
| Forum Index > Closed |
Read the rules in the OP before posting, please. In order to ensure that this thread continues to meet TL standards and follows the proper guidelines, we will be enforcing the rules in the OP more strictly. Be sure to give them a re-read to refresh your memory! The vast majority of you are contributing in a healthy way, keep it up! NOTE: When providing a source, explain why you feel it is relevant and what purpose it adds to the discussion if it's not obvious. Also take note that unsubstantiated tweets/posts meant only to rekindle old arguments can result in a mod action. | ||
|
{CC}StealthBlue
United States41117 Posts
| ||
|
Deleted User 3420
24492 Posts
| ||
|
RCMDVA
United States708 Posts
| ||
|
xDaunt
United States17988 Posts
On November 25 2014 11:32 RCMDVA wrote: This prosecutor is going back and ripping witnesses for like the 5th time. Eyewitness reports are notoriously bad. | ||
|
killa_robot
Canada1884 Posts
| ||
|
JonnyBNoHo
United States6277 Posts
On November 25 2014 11:27 {CC}StealthBlue wrote: I love how the guy has called out the media for just making shit up. It is glorious. I really like this guy  | ||
|
xDaunt
United States17988 Posts
On November 25 2014 11:37 JonnyBNoHo wrote: It is glorious. I really like this guy Again, after what we saw with the Trayvon Martin case, is anyone surprised that the media has been caught making shit up again in one of these cases? | ||
|
RCMDVA
United States708 Posts
(Did he say there is an audio tape of the final 10 shots?) | ||
|
IgnE
United States7681 Posts
This is the rare case where the prosecutor was basically acting as a defense attorney at a grand jury trial. It's supposed to be the other way around. | ||
|
Slaughter
United States20255 Posts
| ||
|
xDaunt
United States17988 Posts
On November 25 2014 11:40 IgnE wrote: This is the rare case where the prosecutor was basically acting as a defense attorney at a grand jury trial. It's supposed to be the other way around. And what are you basing this statement on? | ||
|
xDaunt
United States17988 Posts
On November 25 2014 11:41 Slaughter wrote: 12 shots? Lol makes that statement that the police chief said near the start of this seem even more comically bad. 12 shots sounds like a lot though to me (who has no experience with this type of thing). Go look up the studies on police accuracy firing their weapons under duress. It is "hilariously" bad. | ||
|
JonnyBNoHo
United States6277 Posts
On November 25 2014 11:38 xDaunt wrote: Again, after what we saw with the Trayvon Martin case, is anyone surprised that the media has been caught making shit up again in one of these cases? Yeah, the millions who wanted 'justice'. | ||
|
Slaughter
United States20255 Posts
On November 25 2014 11:43 xDaunt wrote: Go look up the studies on police accuracy firing their weapons under duress. It is "hilariously" bad. I've heard the Military has problems with that too. The problem of bad accuracy has been around for a while, I remember when I was younger when that vid of a police officer getting into a fire fight and killed by some random dude he pulled over was a thing because he wasn't ready/good with that type of situation. | ||
|
{CC}StealthBlue
United States41117 Posts
| ||
|
xDaunt
United States17988 Posts
Not particularly interesting so far. | ||
|
RCMDVA
United States708 Posts
| ||
|
Sermokala
United States14210 Posts
On November 25 2014 11:52 RCMDVA wrote: That "Killed with Impunity" reporter needs to be smacked. more info on this ? | ||
|
RCMDVA
United States708 Posts
Went back and rewound a vid, basically the question was Q: "Your somebody who's had your record questioned my members of the community , how do you feel announcing this decision, What message do you think it sends to the community, they have had numerous, predominantly young black males killed by police with impunity. What message do you think this sends to them?" | ||
|
IgnE
United States7681 Posts
On November 25 2014 11:42 xDaunt wrote: And what are you basing this statement on? https://cbsstlouis.files.wordpress.com/2014/10/immediate-release-10-31-20141.pdf "In his Oct. 31 press release, McCulloch explained that while “[n]ormally, homicide cases are heard by the grand jury in a concise manner with one or two investigators summarizing complex medical and scientific evidence, other physical evidence, and the statements of all witnesses,” in this case “all witnesses with any relevant evidence are being summoned to the grand jury to give their sworn testimony.” In other words, while McCulloch would normally send in a cop or two to briefly outline the evidence and then “ask” the grand jury to indict, in this case he has decided that the grand jury will hear from actual witnesses and weigh actual evidence from both sides before deciding whether or not there is probable cause to believe that Officer Wilson committed a felony." The prosecutor has unavoidable biases that have led to him taking extraordinary actions in making sure that the grand jury decides on no charges. The normal indictment rate is over 90%, including cases with far less evidence of wrongdoing. | ||
| ||
