EPThttp://www.necdisplay.com/Products/Product/?product=186bb118-0c70-4c6a-a511-6d39c54f61bd
PA271W-BK-SV
2560 x 1440 resolution that means 16
What you think is 27'' too big for Starcraft 2?
Starcraft 2 - Best Monitor - 16:9 - 27''
| Forum Index > Closed |
|
vradovic
United States293 Posts
http://www.necdisplay.com/Products/Product/?product=186bb118-0c70-4c6a-a511-6d39c54f61bd PA271W-BK-SV 2560 x 1440 resolution that means 16 What you think is 27'' too big for Starcraft 2? | ||
|
blade55555
United States17423 Posts
 . | ||
|
vradovic
United States293 Posts
 | ||
|
anmajaeyoon
19 Posts
| ||
|
Elec
Canada136 Posts
its the smallest monitor with a 1920x1200 rez or was when i bought it 2 years ago | ||
|
ryanAnger
United States838 Posts
which has been decided is the best for Starcraft 2 so I don't see an issue with it at all. | ||
|
skyR
Canada13817 Posts
| ||
|
TaKemE
Denmark1045 Posts
| ||
|
Motiva
United States1774 Posts
| ||
|
hellsan631
United States695 Posts
if you sit far away, then it would be fine. but i find myself struggling to keep up sometimes on my 24in monitors with sc2. TBH, just get a 3d gaming monitor and play sc2 in 3d | ||
|
virgozero
Canada412 Posts
that monitor is the sex but w/ sc2 it will be just like any other monitor 1280x720, 1366x768, 1600x900, 1920x1080, 2560x1440 WILL ALL SHOW THE SAME AMOUNT OF STUFF on your screen. SC2 locks its FOV (field of view) What you do get is more clarity (if your on max graphics). | ||
|
Skeyser
Canada219 Posts
| ||
|
monitor
United States2408 Posts
The monitor looks really good, but I think you should get a cheaper one. This is waaay to expensive, and SC2 doesn't need the best monitor there is, just a decent one. You should look for something around $900 imo. | ||
|
TaKemE
Denmark1045 Posts
I would be better to get one of the new 120hz monitors if you want the best for gameing: http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16824009222 http://accessories.us.dell.com/sna/products/Displays/productdetail.aspx?c=us&l=en&s=dhs&cs=19&sku=320-8846 | ||
|
EnderW
United States170 Posts
On June 20 2010 08:11 virgozero wrote: why the hell are you basing ur choice of monitor of sc2? that monitor is the sex but w/ sc2 it will be just like any other monitor 1280x720, 1366x768, 1600x900, 1920x1080, 2560x1440 WILL ALL SHOW THE SAME AMOUNT OF STUFF on your screen. SC2 locks its FOV (field of view) What you do get is more clarity (if your on max graphics). this is false. your field of view does get bigger based on your aspect ration. But your screen resolution will not affect your FOV. gamespot tested this and found that 16 has the largest FOV. | ||
|
vradovic
United States293 Posts
On June 20 2010 08:05 TaKemE wrote: There is no reason to buy an expensive ISP monitor for gameing. You should go after a cheaper TN for higher response time. Also i dont think starcraft 2 support 2560 x 1440, so it will just scale 1920x1080. Is this true?? Can Starcraft 2 Support 2560x1440 without scale? | ||
|
EnderW
United States170 Posts
On June 20 2010 08:25 vradovic wrote: Is this true?? Can Starcraft 2 Support 2560x1440 without scale? it is true, 1920x1080 is the highest resolution supported by SC2 right now. whether that will change at release is questionable, but my guess is that it will not. | ||
|
vradovic
United States293 Posts
On June 20 2010 08:19 TaKemE wrote: A 7ms G-T-G (16 ms) Response Time and higher input lag is not realy good for gameing. Yes ISP got better colors but that dosent matter much in games where you almost cant tell the difference unless your an expert. I would be better to get one of the new 120hz monitors if you want the best for gameing: http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16824009222 http://accessories.us.dell.com/sna/products/Displays/productdetail.aspx?c=us&l=en&s=dhs&cs=19&sku=320-8846 Thank you and all others for replay!! I will think about this two. I have atm Samsung 2233rz. But I would like to buy 16 : 9 | ||
|
Raelcun
United States3747 Posts
On June 20 2010 07:55 Elec wrote: i got a 24 inch too its the smallest monitor with a 1920x1200 rez or was when i bought it 2 years ago I have a 22 inch that runs 1920x1280 just fyi. | ||
|
teekuppi
78 Posts
| ||
|
zoLo
United States5896 Posts
| ||
|
vradovic
United States293 Posts
On June 20 2010 08:49 zoLo wrote: I use a 23" LCD monitor, but I use a lower resolution ingame since I don't want to play SC2 on max resolution. why? | ||
|
earky
United States87 Posts
| ||
|
Challe
Afghanistan58 Posts
| ||
|
cougar22
Canada98 Posts
I could buy like eight 24" monitors for that price. | ||
|
vradovic
United States293 Posts
On June 20 2010 09:01 Challe wrote: I have a 27 inch. its good for sc2 but not so much for sc1 Nice. Can you play on max resolution ? | ||
|
vradovic
United States293 Posts
On June 20 2010 09:01 cougar22 wrote: $1,649.00??? I could buy like eight 24" monitors for that price. + I must pay like +600$ for transport and custom | ||
|
lyk503
United States261 Posts
On June 20 2010 08:08 hellsan631 wrote: the bigger the monitor, the longer it takes for you to move your mouse cursor across the screen, and the more area there is to keep track of with your eyes. if you sit far away, then it would be fine. but i find myself struggling to keep up sometimes on my 24in monitors with sc2. TBH, just get a 3d gaming monitor and play sc2 in 3d Have you ever heard of mouse sensitivity? | ||
|
pshych0
274 Posts
| ||
|
vradovic
United States293 Posts
 this article here say they run sc2 on 2560 x 1600 http://www.pcgameshardware.com/aid,705223/Starcraft-2-Beta-maxed-out/Download/ | ||
|
MangoTango
United States3670 Posts
On June 20 2010 07:52 blade55555 wrote: I don't think thats too big I doubt 3 more inches is too big either .That's what she said :o I find that my 21" monitor is almost too big. I've moved it to the back of my desk but it's still too big. | ||
|
EnderW
United States170 Posts
On June 20 2010 09:13 MangoTango wrote: That's what she said :o I find that my 21" monitor is almost too big. I've moved it to the back of my desk but it's still too big. I agree w/ this. I've hooked my computer up to my 22" Monitor, which I am using now, and it is almost too big for desk use. I've also tried it on my 27" and 37" monitors that i use for multi tabling poker, but they are simply too large to use on my desk without my eyes straining immensely | ||
|
spinal2k
Portugal148 Posts
On June 20 2010 08:11 virgozero wrote: why the hell are you basing ur choice of monitor of sc2? that monitor is the sex but w/ sc2 it will be just like any other monitor 1280x720, 1366x768, 1600x900, 1920x1080, 2560x1440 WILL ALL SHOW THE SAME AMOUNT OF STUFF on your screen. SC2 locks its FOV (field of view) What you do get is more clarity (if your on max graphics). false. here you go SC2 Resolution Comparison regards | ||
|
BladeRunner
United States407 Posts
Problem is, I still don't think they're selling this in the US and I'm not sure when or if they ever will. I brought it back from my last trip to Akihabara. http://www.lg.com/uk/it-products/monitors/LG-lcd-monitor-W2363V.jsp photo against CRT with thru-mode on: http://img40.imageshack.us/img40/9803/dsc6075h.jpg photo against CRT with thru-mode off: http://img140.imageshack.us/img140/1928/dsc6079.jpg If you haven't seen it already, there a huge thread on SRK about this topic because as you know fighting game players can be quite picky about input lag: http://shoryuken.com/showthread.php?t=174085 | ||
| ||
