TL S3 HSL Qualifiers - Page 18

On December 29 2007 08:00 LumberJack wrote:
so you lie about records, you falsely accuse me of hacking, and yet im the troll? How does that work? You're the one crying about 3 hatch ling when you only want to make 1 cannon, and im the bm idiot? Wow, look in the mirror kid, seriously

its actually 1-3, but thanks for lying about it again : ) Maybe ill host our games sometime? Cause i actually have the replays ;P

On February 10 2008 12:14 ShaLLoW[baY] wrote:
Lumberjack, one quick question.

Is this your internetz-r-serius-buziness face?

On February 10 2008 13:07 Wizard wrote:
Tell me, how is replacing players "complete shit"? I posted above the reason behind the decision to kick the players and then have replacements: to summarize once again, "those who want to play will post here (or pm me) to complain and I'll put them back, while those who don't post...wouldn't have played anyways." I have had several pm's complaining that they had been kicked even though they were planning to play the games: in this situation (and in all similar circumstances) I put the player back into the tournament. I think that the correct decision to make when ~40/~240 games have been played, with the deadline nearing to kick those inactive. Fair? I think so. Was it merited? Absolutely. Joining a tournament should be a commitment: I don't update the standings and results every week or so. I update them within an hour usually. That shows that I have the commitment necessary to run this tournament; what I don't have is the patience and commitment to handle brainless idiots who don't play their games and have no intent to do so. I believe that my decision was correct, and I stand by it.

On February 10 2008 13:07 Wizard wrote:
Tell me, how is replacing players "complete shit"? I posted above the reason behind the decision to kick the players and then have replacements: to summarize once again, "those who want to play will post here (or pm me) to complain and I'll put them back, while those who don't post...wouldn't have played anyways." I have had several pm's complaining that they had been kicked even though they were planning to play the games: in this situation (and in all similar circumstances) I put the player back into the tournament. I think that the correct decision to make when ~40/~240 games have been played, with the deadline nearing to kick those inactive. Fair? I think so. Was it merited? Absolutely. Joining a tournament should be a commitment: I don't update the standings and results every week or so. I update them within an hour usually. That shows that I have the commitment necessary to run this tournament; what I don't have is the patience and commitment to handle brainless idiots who don't play their games and have no intent to do so. I believe that my decision was correct, and I stand by it.

On February 10 2008 13:29 Seraphim wrote:


I won't argue with you, but when you set the deadline to Feb 19, you should give the people at least that much time to play their games. Replacing them out before the deadline is just utterly ridiculous

Those are just my thoughts and we'll end it at that

On February 10 2008 13:17 LumberJack wrote:


Why dont you hop on hamachi and you can jerk off to my pic while i smash you?

there, is that what you're looking for? :|

On February 10 2008 13:20 Chill wrote:


Ignore the idiots, I can't believe how quickly this is updated and how well-run it is.

PS Chill > nAi.Cyrax @ Blue Storm (For some reason it doesn't say that we're supposed to play each other, but we assumed we should... =] )

On February 10 2008 14:33 littlechava wrote:
well i just played payt and won on katrina but i guess it doesnt count since you took him out
reporting anyway just in case~

On February 10 2008 15:45 Chill wrote:
Group D
Chill > Art.Oshibori_Probe @ Blue Storm

On February 10 2008 15:47 InfesTeD]i[ wrote:


Do u mean Cyrax?

On February 10 2008 16:00 Chill wrote:



wtf no I posted that win like 5 posts up.
learn to read newb
<3