EPTmanga is japanese comic and manhwa is korean comics
SC manga - The story of X and Nada - Page 7
| Forum Index > BW General |
|
imperfek
Australia160 Posts
manga is japanese comic and manhwa is korean comics | ||
|
crazeman
664 Posts
On December 24 2010 06:54 Iplaythings wrote: i love how the commentators and crowd were oblivious to the fact that he hacked the reaver to get a scarab, haha :D LOL HE MADE MAGIC SCARAB! LEGALITY! I think you read it wrong, he didn't hack the reaver to get a extra scarab. + Show Spoiler + From what I saw he found a spider mine in the middle of the map and was using super 800 apm gosu micro to slowly lure the spidermine to the SCV by picking up and dropping the empty reaver repeatedly. and holy shit thanks for the bump and the translation. That was an epic read. | ||
Cedstick
Canada3336 Posts
The ending is so disappointing. NOOOOOOOO, NADA, YOU TRIED SO HARD. | ||
|
PH
United States6173 Posts
On December 24 2010 06:54 Iplaythings wrote: i love how the commentators and crowd were oblivious to the fact that he hacked the reaver to get a scarab, haha :D LOL HE MADE MAGIC SCARAB! LEGALITY! He was just pulling one of Nada's leftover scarabs from somewhere random on the map. | ||
|
acidfreak
Romania352 Posts
| ||
|
neobowman
Canada3324 Posts
On December 24 2010 07:43 PH wrote: He was just pulling one of Nada's leftover | ||
|
_Quasar_
Russian Federation4405 Posts
On December 24 2010 06:24 sluggaslamoo wrote: Yeah but Nada dced, meaning that Nada lost or at least, didn't win. Nada didn't need to win, he needed to have a winning replay - and here he could save one. If one watched that replay he would see Nada attacking last X's pylon with X absolutely no chance to stop it from happening. Then he would see "X has left the game" which means Nada won. So this would be a winning replay. Yeah Nada lost by terms of progaming rules, but won by terms of in-game rules that define a won game :D And.. after all it wasnt Nada who dced... it was X... o.o And as it was a LAN game, the only possibilty for it to disconnect was intentionally interrupting the connection. Guess who could have done it. Obviously not Nada.  | ||
|
kamikami
France1057 Posts
| ||
|
valaki
Hungary2476 Posts
| ||
|
ReketSomething
United States6012 Posts
Then it would have been a draw... | ||
|
SamuraiJJ
Taiwan22 Posts
| ||
swanized
Canada2480 Posts
| ||
|
pinkranger15
Philippines1597 Posts
| ||
|
k.taeyang
Peru145 Posts
| ||
|
Ryusei-R1
United States2106 Posts
this was amazing I read this while playing a ladder game on SC2 that's how good it was | ||
|
l10f
United States3241 Posts
On December 24 2010 08:03 _Quasar_ wrote: Nada didn't need to win, he needed to have a winning replay - and here he could save one. If one watched that replay he would see Nada attacking last X's pylon with X absolutely no chance to stop it from happening. Then he would see "X has left the game" which means Nada won. So this would be a winning replay. Yeah Nada lost by terms of progaming rules, but won by terms of in-game rules that define a won game :D And.. after all it wasnt Nada who dced... it was X... o.o And as it was a LAN game, the only possibilty for it to disconnect was intentionally interrupting the connection. Guess who could have done it. Obviously not Nada. not true, in 1v1 if your opponent disconnects it counts as draw :< | ||
|
Z3kk
4099 Posts
Does that mean the "real" ending is, in fact, everyone dying (à la Great Expectations, in which the ending is sad, but Dickens wrote an alternate happy ending because the original was just so depressing)? | ||
|
Taekwon
United States8155 Posts
| ||
|
JustQuitWarcraftIII
United States679 Posts
| ||
flamewheel
FREEAGLELAND26780 Posts
On December 24 2010 13:58 l10f wrote: not true, in 1v1 if your opponent disconnects it counts as draw :< Until you complain on ICCup! | ||
| ||
