EPTMaybe Blizzard should just quit the gaming industry and start mass online roulettes? I'm pretty sure they would make lot of Martingalers go broke.
/rant
MMS rant
| Blogs > ondik |
|
ondik
Czech Republic2908 Posts
Maybe Blizzard should just quit the gaming industry and start mass online roulettes? I'm pretty sure they would make lot of Martingalers go broke. /rant | ||
|
Wolf
Korea (South)3290 Posts
| ||
|
andiCR
Costa Rica2273 Posts
Also, thats some fked up luck you got there  I hate it when i get mass pvp's too.. and mass pvz's on blistering wtfEdit: oh.. u meant match making system not match making ranking my bad | ||
|
ondik
Czech Republic2908 Posts
On January 18 2011 05:02 Wolf wrote: Matchmaking attempts to give you a 50/50 winratio. That's why it puts you in matchups you don't like, because it knows you're worse at those. I'm not joking. are you serious or just trolling me, because after this I'm gonna believe anything mms related. edit: what's funny about it is that I came back to SC2 after 2 months break. Before the break I had win ratio against terran around 20 %, against protoss 70 % (good colossi build) and against zerg 60 % (shame on me for 4 gating). After few games and getting back to my previous perfomance level this changed as I somehow was rolling over every terran I played. And then I stopped playing them. | ||
|
Blisse
Canada3710 Posts
Calm down and play the game. Sometimes you flip a coin and get 5 heads in a row. Sometimes you don't. | ||
|
WhiteLight
Canada55 Posts
On January 18 2011 05:02 Wolf wrote: Matchmaking attempts to give you a 50/50 winratio. That's why it puts you in matchups you don't like, because it knows you're worse at those. I'm not joking. I seriously doubt thats true, im currently on a 16 game streak without facing a zerg (TvZ is by far my worse matchup as im 13-3 in those 16 games and im playing 2500 diamond players). If someone has a better explanation of not playing a specific race I would like to hear it. Edit: what region are you in, I just assumed it wasn't giving me much zerg because NA has alot of protoss and fewer zerg (I dont know if that has changed in the past few months though) | ||
BabyToss!
Czech Republic588 Posts
| ||
|
green.at
Austria1459 Posts
 getting PvP all the time since i decided to just dont bother about PvP anymore and just cheese/leave. don't know when i played the last PvT on the ladder. i was focusing on PvZ because it was my worst MU. Damn you mmr/mms! | ||
|
Zocat
Germany2229 Posts
On January 18 2011 04:58 ondik wrote: (aprox, let's say each race is played by 30 % of players) 0,0101 % WTF BNET? How many players / games are on bnet? What's the chance of at least one person from this set having this kind of experience? Just sucks for you to be one of those guys. | ||
|
Szgk
Poland112 Posts
| ||
|
sqrt
1210 Posts
On January 18 2011 05:04 ondik wrote: are you serious or just trolling me, because after this I'm gonna believe anything mms related. edit: what's funny about it is that I came back to SC2 after 2 months break. Before the break I had win ratio against terran around 20 %, against protoss 70 % (good colossi build) and against zerg 60 % (shame on me for 4 gating). After few games and getting back to my previous perfomance level this changed as I somehow was rolling over every terran I played. And then I stopped playing them. If you are coming after a brake you should expect this. Seriously the level of play has increased and your abilities have stagnated it's normal. | ||
|
TheNessman
United States4158 Posts
 | ||
|
ondik
Czech Republic2908 Posts
On January 18 2011 05:20 Blisse wrote: Since you're rolling Terrans, why would you want it to place you against more Terrans. You can predict the result already, so you don't need to practice as much against them. Now it's letting you practice your other match ups more, so you can do to them what you do to Terran. Because I just want to have fun. I don't care whether I need to improve in any of my MUs and I CERTAINLY don't want BNET to make the decission for me. If I'm significantly better (have higher MMR) in one MU than another, then BNET should just naturally match me with a T who has the same MMR, isn't that obvious? By the way, following this logic, if I lost on purpose every game against T would BNET keep on matching me with terrans till the end of world? Sometimes you flip a coin and get 5 heads in a row. Sometimes you don't. yea.. or 18 heads in a row On January 18 2011 05:20 WhiteLight wrote: Edit: what region are you in, I just assumed it wasn't giving me much zerg because NA has alot of protoss and fewer zerg (I dont know if that has changed in the past few months though) europe, 23XX-24XX diamond, I believe there's no terran shortage On January 18 2011 05:44 Szgk wrote: Is it possible that you have voted down terran-favored maps? only map i've ever voted down is shakuras | ||
|
palanq
United States761 Posts
a more reasonable thing to calculate is the odds of any person getting a streak of X or more games on ladder without any opponents of any particular race the odds of this are much much higher | ||
|
forgotten0ne
United States951 Posts
wait, what? | ||
|
Nyx
Rwanda460 Posts
On January 18 2011 06:12 forgotten0ne wrote: Yeah! A lot of my texts have been getting delayed, it sucks! wait, what? Yeah sometimes I send somebody a picture then a few minutes later call them like, have you got it, and they're like, no, I'm like wtf. Fucking battle.net | ||
|
ReketSomething
United States6012 Posts
I havent had that much bad luck though and its been pretty balalanced. | ||
| ||
