EPTTL Mafia LXIV: A Game of Intrigue
| Forum Index > TL Mafia |
|
gumshoe
Canada3602 Posts
| ||
|
gumshoe
Canada3602 Posts
On January 10 2014 04:49 Xatalos wrote: gumshoe, are you sure you won't go full AFK at some point like last games we've played together?  Anything can happen in this strange and wonderful world | ||
|
gumshoe
Canada3602 Posts
| ||
|
gumshoe
Canada3602 Posts
On January 11 2014 09:36 Xatalos wrote: You're quite a salesman.... At this rate maybe I should actually run for Mayor... I've you vote for me I promise not to lurk ( : | ||
|
gumshoe
Canada3602 Posts
| ||
|
gumshoe
Canada3602 Posts
## vote the king you can keep in check. | ||
|
gumshoe
Canada3602 Posts
On January 11 2014 09:42 DoctorHelvetica wrote: So should we wait until we clear out all the lurkers (alignment non-indicative behavior) and people you don't like to actually try to draw out scum, would you pass on a scum lynch to remove a player you have a "hard" time reading, as though the rest of the town should frame their opinions around your perspective? And what is the policy exactly, does this fall under LAL or anything like that - or is this just your personal preference. Your personal preference is meaningless to me and should mean absolutely nothing to anybody. We can deal with suspicious lurkers by threatening hammer. If I'm mayor, I will lynch my top scumread at the end of Day 1, no matter who it is. I do not care if it is Marv or BC, the most suspicious person at the end of Day 1 will be lynched. I will threaten hammer on anyone who is under significant suspicion in the thread and fails to respond to it. I will threaten immediate hammer until they adequately respond to all accusations, I will threaten hammer to lurkers who try to avoid the discussion. By properly utilizing votes and the pressure of a hammer, we can force people to play at the pace the town wants them to play at. That's all. I won't try to be a hero and hammer someone without announcing or first putting on adequate pressure and giving people a chance to defend themselves but I would not be afraid to use it if I suspect the mafia are making a serious effort to derail a lynch on bad logic. Have you considered that your aggressive approach will stimy conversation day 1 ? I mean it might be ok for getting one guy to talk, but several other townies may quiver in the shadows at the thought of a scum mayor Dh jumping on something they say. Also on the one hand you say you'll threaten hammer on anyone, on the other you say you'll lynch the scummiest read... Assuming the second is your aim, do you expect people to still take your hammer puffing seriusly? ## vote the king you can keep in check. | ||
|
gumshoe
Canada3602 Posts
On January 11 2014 09:48 Xatalos wrote: Sadly I don't think you'd be a good choice even if you were confirmed town and wouldn't probably be going full AFK at some point :/ Why not, I would allow town convo to flow, stimulating it trough questions not threats and then I'd kill the scummiest player, and would you really wanna invite a scum mayor just to get someone whose " good " at the job? Also can't tell if your joking here or if you actually have this low opinion of me that'd you'd rather hand the throne to scum if given the choice ) ; real cold xata. Or maybe you just scum. ## vote the king you can keep in check | ||
|
gumshoe
Canada3602 Posts
On January 11 2014 10:07 DoctorHelvetica wrote: And it's not about threats - the threat is meant to foster an atmosphere where questions are answered, you can't deflect and avoid when I can kill you instantly. It's that simple. I don't think that mafia want to be in that kind of scenario at all, a scum mayor would reveal himself immediately playing like this too because he would be forced to apply this policy to all players and if he starts picking and choosing which passive/unresponsive players get threatened that's a pretty bad look. A scum mayor doesn't want to play this aggressively because there's no way of him avoiding threatening a hammer on his own team mates. Which FORCES his teammates to get in further drawn out discussions/arguments regarding their own alignment. Not a good situation for mafia to be in imo. Jesus christ you dont fuck around with your answers 0_0 Yeah I could see myself voting for you. | ||
|
gumshoe
Canada3602 Posts
I'm assuming its so that the king doesn't make them body guards/targets. Regardless let's not talk about what the blues should and shouldn't don't do in thread. Ala if you really want to know what rayns talking about just pm him... | ||
|
gumshoe
Canada3602 Posts
On January 11 2014 12:40 raynpelikoneet wrote: I don't think i am scum. If DrH thinks he is scum then maybe we should lynch him. Looks like we're getting uncompromising rayn this game ) : | ||
|
gumshoe
Canada3602 Posts
On January 11 2014 15:45 WaveofShadow wrote: Even were I confirmed town, how do you know I will use the mayoral powers effectively? I would know that your not actively using them ineffectively. | ||
|
gumshoe
Canada3602 Posts
On January 12 2014 09:00 Coagulation wrote: wtf. I havnt even got a chance to post yet and you guys have already written me off and shit on me. fuck u guys then. find someone else to shit on. Show us the townie certificate of townieness asap ) : | ||
|
gumshoe
Canada3602 Posts
## Vote: Marvellosity | ||
|
gumshoe
Canada3602 Posts
On January 13 2014 04:50 Hopeless1der wrote: i unvoted to try and make sure instant majority is not reached early Should I wait as we'll? Why are you. So hesitant to embrace the one true king? | ||
|
gumshoe
Canada3602 Posts
| ||
|
gumshoe
Canada3602 Posts
| ||
|
gumshoe
Canada3602 Posts
On January 14 2014 09:32 marvellosity wrote: you had no excuse while Xata was alive either. Its the xata curse, I cannot play in the same game as Xata. | ||
|
gumshoe
Canada3602 Posts
Not sure, its just how it is. If Xatas in a game making posts is like writing underwater. | ||
|
gumshoe
Canada3602 Posts
| ||
| ||
