|
On July 18 2009 01:13 DeCoup wrote:Train <- This Thread -> Rail edit: I was enjoying this thread and the anticipation people were showing for pro-gamers playing SC2 (woot!) until it got derailed and turned into a WC3/WC3-SC comparisons thread 
It was inevitable, really. Two progamers from two different games are bound to draw comparisons between the two games. 
That said, I think Moon will win, but I wouldn't be surprised if Nada takes it. Well, because he's Nada...
I'm really excited for the merging (clashing?) of communities once SC2 retail hits. :/
|
On July 18 2009 01:32 SoleSteeler wrote:Show nested quote +On July 18 2009 01:13 DeCoup wrote:Train <- This Thread -> Rail edit: I was enjoying this thread and the anticipation people were showing for pro-gamers playing SC2 (woot!) until it got derailed and turned into a WC3/WC3-SC comparisons thread It was inevitable, really. Two progamers from two different games are bound to draw comparisons between the two games. That said, I think Moon will win, but I wouldn't be surprised if Nada takes it. Well, because he's Nada... I'm really excited for the merging (clashing?) of communities once SC2 retail hits. :/
lol sc2 will be like new-age racism. Racism based on what game you came from.
.. not that I support racism, nor am I racist
|
Awesome, I will finally get to see what SC2 is like spectator-wise :D and in real time match!
|
MrHoon
10183 Posts
mmm yesss Nada and Moon
To be totally honest, I think Moon will win without a doubt. He has more experience with the game afterall.
But in my heart I really wish Nada wins... So WC3 people don't come in here spouting "LOL HOW U ENJOYIN UR PENTIUM 2 GAME LOLOL"
|
United States20667 Posts
Those who say NaDa relies on predetermined builds and, without them, will die miserably are terribly misinformed.
He is mechanically superior, possessing impeccable micro/macro coupled with strong game-sense and improvisational ability. While certainly he, as with any progamer, prepares build-orders and strategies before matches, it must be noted that several progamers have complimented him on his on-the-fly play.
Despite his poor form and the inclusion of SC2 mechanics, I would not discount the Genius just yet.
|
On July 18 2009 02:06 Last Romantic wrote:
Those who say NaDa relies on predetermined builds and, without them, will die miserably are terribly misinformed.
He is mechanically superior, possessing impeccable micro/macro coupled with strong game-sense and improvisational ability. While certainly he, as with any progamer, prepares build-orders and strategies before matches, it must be noted that several progamers have complimented him on his on-the-fly play.
Despite his poor form and the inclusion of SC2 mechanics, I would not discount the Genius just yet.
Quoted for the mother fucking truth.
Genius Terran representin'! I'm curious to see how this will turn out as well, should be good.
|
On July 18 2009 02:06 Last Romantic wrote:
Those who say NaDa relies on predetermined builds and, without them, will die miserably are terribly misinformed.
He is mechanically superior, possessing impeccable micro/macro coupled with strong game-sense and improvisational ability. While certainly he, as with any progamer, prepares build-orders and strategies before matches, it must be noted that several progamers have complimented him on his on-the-fly play.
Despite his poor form and the inclusion of SC2 mechanics, I would not discount the Genius just yet.
QFT from my heart.
Funny how every1 label Nada as a macro gamer all the time while I keep getting this images in my head everytime a nada thread pop up :d
The scene looks like this:Tvz Nada as terran obviously.Zerg def with a few sunken , nada manages to get throu like 2 marines and 2 medic,marines raping shit and godly micro can be seen.
2nd scene on lost temple( this one is harder I belive).It was back in the days u know...TvZ late game.
Zerg had a lot of ultras,seemed like nada lost,and guess what he Traps!! the ultras with supplys near 6'o clock.Oh man that was Genius :D
Sry for the offtopic just havin a nostalgic mood.
Edit:If any1 can provide me the links to those games that would be epic.
|
Maybe put this poll at the start?
Poll: Who will win the SC2 showmatch?
(Vote): NaDa
(Vote): Moon
|
MURICA15980 Posts
I'll be rooting for the home team. And in this case, that's Nada.
|
konadora
Singapore66366 Posts
Moon > NaDa anytime, anyday
|
On July 18 2009 02:29 SoleSteeler wrote:Maybe put this poll at the start? Poll: Who will win the SC2 showmatch?( Vote): NaDa ( Vote): Moon
Accidentally voted for moon because the relational positions are switched between the poll choices and the actual results display >.<
|
Moon is so bad nowadays only a former shadow of himself, voted for nada of course
|
On July 18 2009 02:45 wiesel wrote:
Moon is so bad nowadays only a former shadow of himself, voted for nada of course
maybe because he's preparing for SC2?
|
Didnt wemadefox already said in an interview that they dont want moon to play sc2? They want him to play wc3.
And i dont know how you can prepare for a game without having a playable copy of it ?
NaDa is just a ultra beast staying in top30 for last 7? years with ~200 progamers in your back, while Moon only had to dominate the same ~20 wc3 progamers there are until now.
If NaDa plays Terran im pretty sure he'll win this easily
|
TL I'm terribly disspointed.
How can any of you possibly vote for Moon over NaDa?
I like Wc3 A LOT and I do respect Moon; but this is motherfucking NaDa we're talking about.
|
I'm also a bit surprised they're (currently) tied at 13 votes a piece.
|
On July 18 2009 02:35 konadora wrote:
Moon > NaDa anytime, anyday
You're dead to me, kid. Watch yo' back and stay strapped!
|
On July 18 2009 02:35 konadora wrote:
Moon > NaDa anytime, anyday
Say whaaat
|
On July 18 2009 02:06 Last Romantic wrote:
Those who say NaDa relies on predetermined builds and, without them, will die miserably are terribly misinformed.
He is mechanically superior, possessing impeccable micro/macro coupled with strong game-sense and improvisational ability. While certainly he, as with any progamer, prepares build-orders and strategies before matches, it must be noted that several progamers have complimented him on his on-the-fly play.
Despite his poor form and the inclusion of SC2 mechanics, I would not discount the Genius just yet.
QFT, i'm quite sure that he isn't Genius Terran cause he is robot, but cause he is a Genius :-) Just look at pimpest plays - he might be outshadowed by Boxer but still NaDa is there - Yamato, Divine Wind, medic wall (Salvation Army or whatever it was named), this action with using Z's base as maze in which ultras can't get them, you just can't call this not genuine
|
On July 18 2009 03:10 Klive5ive wrote:
TL I'm terribly disspointed.
How can any of you possibly vote for Moon over NaDa?
I like Wc3 A LOT and I do respect Moon; but this is motherfucking NaDa we're talking about.
I have to agree with this, after all we ARE fans of SC... I think?
It should be interesting though. Hopefully NaDa shows SC>WC3
|
|
|
|
|
|
EPT
