EPTI am 60% across the board.
MUC or 'How to Know your win rate per match-up' - Page 5
| Forum Index > SC2 General |
|
givemefive
United States300 Posts
I am 60% across the board. | ||
|
Wr3k
Canada2533 Posts
On June 16 2010 07:50 LittleeD wrote: Maybe ? means random? It's the overall win rate vs all races. | ||
|
Goobus
Hong Kong587 Posts
Seems pretty awesome from what people have been posting on here. | ||
|
crms
United States11933 Posts
ZvT : 9 win(s) & 5 loss(es) : 64.285% ZvZ : 7 win(s) & 3 loss(es) : 70% Zv? : 32 win(s) & 12 loss(es) : 72.727% not bad for a non scbw player in diamond! FUUUUU Terran. hmm so i guess it doesn't cover all replays? *edit i learned to read* cool program, thanks. | ||
|
Xapti
Canada2473 Posts
I can easily tell that this program can't distinguish between custom games and auto-matchmaking games. No way that I could I have 68% winrate vs toss and 74% vs terran unless one was to count the custom games I play for practice or to help others. I can understand 80% ZvZ though, cause I hardly play any ZvZ in custom games, and know I am good at it. Kinda disappointing results from me and everyone else, cause it doesn't really show any significant trends. (this is at least mostly due to damn custom games) I guess in the future I can try saving all matchmaking games to a new folder, but it would be hard to me to remember. There was a program someone wrote to make www.starcraftrankings.com ; that same type of code could be used to detect the results of matchmaking games. Of course this is limited in the sense that it would only work while the server's up and accounts aren't wiped, but it's still important and useful information. | ||
|
Cyanure
France51 Posts
On June 16 2010 11:53 Goobus wrote: Cyanure, any chance for a mac version? The sourcecode is *almost* compatible with mac, but we would need someone with a mac, some basic programing background, and a lot of will to make mac binaries... And even after that, you'll need Qt to make it work. On Windows, i can just add the ".ddl"s to make it work on any computer. On mac, anyone who wants to use it will have to compile Qt first... and last time someone I know tried, it was a pain (it worked eventually, but it took hours and multiple other libraries installation). If someone know some kind of trick to emulate that... On June 16 2010 16:30 Xapti wrote: Great program! but there's obviously the huge issue of custom games right now. I can easily tell that this program can't distinguish between custom games and auto-matchmaking games. It actually can't distinguish in his current version [1.0.3] (next most probably will). I couldn't find this information in the first place, if you absolutely need to know it right now, you can check your adversary pool and remove everyone you have practiced with (that is the main use of this feature anyway). It's clearly suboptimal, but it may be slightly better. btw, next version will come today or tomorrow... | ||
|
TheRabidDeer
United States3806 Posts
PvP : 22 win(s) & 15 loss(es) : 59.459% PvT : 21 win(s) & 7 loss(es) : 75% PvZ : 11 win(s) & 16 loss(es) : 40.74% Pv? : 54 win(s) & 38 loss(es) : 58.695% TvP : 2 win(s) & 0 loss(es) : 100% TvT : 2 win(s) & 0 loss(es) : 100% TvZ : 3 win(s) & 0 loss(es) : 100% Tv? : 7 win(s) & 0 loss(es) : 100% ZvP : 2 win(s) & 0 loss(es) : 100% ZvT : 1 win(s) & 1 loss(es) : 50% ZvZ : 4 win(s) & 9 loss(es) : 30.769% Zv? : 7 win(s) & 10 loss(es) : 41.176% ?vP : 26 win(s) & 15 loss(es) : 63.414% ?vT : 24 win(s) & 8 loss(es) : 75% ?vZ : 18 win(s) & 25 loss(es) : 41.86% ?v? : 68 win(s) & 48 loss(es) : 58.62% Yea... I really struggle against zerg =[ lol @ my Tv? though =\ | ||
|
ChickenLips
2912 Posts
| ||
|
Ghostcom
Denmark4781 Posts
On June 16 2010 20:06 ChickenLips wrote: Yeah PvZ seems to be favored for Zerg at the moment. Protoss has very strong openings vs. Terran which I love. I would be VERY careful with drawing such a conclusion based on these data. | ||
|
Starshaped
Sweden575 Posts
ZvT : 16 win(s) & 3 loss(es) : 84.21% ZvZ : 13 win(s) & 9 loss(es) : 59.09% Zv? : 45 win(s) & 15 loss(es) : 75% ?vP : 18 win(s) & 7 loss(es) : 72% ?vT : 18 win(s) & 3 loss(es) : 85.714% ?vZ : 15 win(s) & 10 loss(es) : 60% ?v? : 51 win(s) & 20 loss(es) : 71.83% For a WC3 player I sure am owning it up ;O Well except ZvZ. I tried my silly Spine Crawler rush too much. It did work a few times, though. | ||
|
ig0tfish
United States345 Posts
PvT : 0 win(s) & 0 loss(es) : 0% PvZ : 0 win(s) & 1 loss(es) : 0% Pv? : 0 win(s) & 1 loss(es) : 0% TvP : 4 win(s) & 0 loss(es) : 100% TvT : 6 win(s) & 0 loss(es) : 100% TvZ : 2 win(s) & 0 loss(es) : 100% Tv? : 12 win(s) & 0 loss(es) : 100% ZvP : 1 win(s) & 0 loss(es) : 100% ZvT : 0 win(s) & 0 loss(es) : 0% ZvZ : 0 win(s) & 0 loss(es) : 0% Zv? : 1 win(s) & 0 loss(es) : 100% ?vP : 5 win(s) & 0 loss(es) : 100% ?vT : 6 win(s) & 0 loss(es) : 100% ?vZ : 2 win(s) & 1 loss(es) : 66.666% ?v? : 13 win(s) & 1 loss(es) : 92.857% | ||
|
shiftY803
200 Posts
On June 16 2010 20:24 Ghostcom wrote: I would be VERY careful with drawing such a conclusion based on these data. And when he says be very careful, what he really means is that all the data in this thread is completely meaningless for drawing balance conclusions: ie NOT statistically significant. Let's go ahead and leave balance discussion out of this one. Blizzard has data on thousands (possibly millions?) of games; and, unless we get access to it, we really don't have a leg to stand on. On the other hand, the code does help identify "leaks" in one's own play if a certain matchup is hurting and you haven't noticed. | ||
|
Cyanure
France51 Posts
| ||
|
VoodooDog
Germany47 Posts
PvT : 0 win(s) & 0 loss(es) : 0% PvZ : 0 win(s) & 0 loss(es) : 0% Pv? : 0 win(s) & 0 loss(es) : 0% TvP : 0 win(s) & 0 loss(es) : 0% TvT : 0 win(s) & 0 loss(es) : 0% TvZ : 0 win(s) & 0 loss(es) : 0% Tv? : 0 win(s) & 0 loss(es) : 0% ZvP : 0 win(s) & 0 loss(es) : 0% ZvT : 0 win(s) & 0 loss(es) : 0% ZvZ : 0 win(s) & 0 loss(es) : 0% Zv? : 0 win(s) & 0 loss(es) : 0% ?vP : 0 win(s) & 0 loss(es) : 0% ?vT : 0 win(s) & 0 loss(es) : 0% ?vZ : 0 win(s) & 0 loss(es) : 0% ?v? : 0 win(s) & 0 loss(es) : 0% map and adversary pool are empty | ||
|
Delarchon
Finland132 Posts
I was so sure that my worst mu is PvT, but what do you know 76% win and mirror matches 44%. | ||
|
Forlorn
Korea (South)69 Posts
ZvT : 57 win(s) & 29 loss(es) : 66.279% ZvZ : 49 win(s) & 36 loss(es) : 57.647% Zv? : 151 win(s) & 113 loss(es) : 57.196% Mine surprised me a bit. I thought my win rate versus Protoss was like 33%. Also I thought I had a higher ZvZ ratio. Oh well ^^ Awesome program =) | ||
|
a176
Canada6688 Posts
loving my zerg ratio  ZvP : 20 win(s) & 12 loss(es) : 62.5% ZvT : 22 win(s) & 10 loss(es) : 68.75% ZvZ : 13 win(s) & 11 loss(es) : 54.166% Zv? : 55 win(s) & 33 loss(es) : 62.5% | ||
|
Sokalo
United States375 Posts
You'd think this thing would be implemented into bnet 2.0 by now though, since these statistics were already present in the WC3 profiles. | ||
|
javiskefka
United States26 Posts
| ||
|
choppa
France5 Posts
VoodooDog, do you have recent replays in your directory? Did you put the name that you used in-game, with the upper-case characters where needed? | ||
| ||
