EPTOn July 01 2013 04:17 Lorning wrote:
Guess its more Red Bull sending them instead of esf, because of the training grounds
Guess its more Red Bull sending them instead of esf, because of the training grounds
The bull in the room?
[MLG] Day 3 Spring Championships 2013 - Page 102
| Forum Index > StarCraft 2 Tournaments |
|
Fusilero
United Kingdom50293 Posts
The bull in the room? | ||
|
Sabu113
United States11086 Posts
| ||
|
theMagus
578 Posts
1 tournament that a kespa player didn't win. congrats to anti-kespa peeps  | ||
|
iamahydralisk
United States813 Posts
Just my two cents. | ||
|
SniXSniPe
United States1938 Posts
On July 01 2013 04:14 1Dhalism wrote: so this season's OSL/WCS results are meaningless? Why would you try comparing two tournaments with different formats? | ||
|
Plansix
United States60190 Posts
On July 01 2013 04:16 Aphid wrote: Not sure what your getting at, but Naniwa has been very impressive today. This is my sarcastic face. My best sarcastic face. | ||
|
MrSourGit
England135 Posts
| ||
stuchiu
Fiddler's Green42661 Posts
On July 01 2013 04:17 SarcasmMonster wrote: What category does Polt fall under? Do we unironically count him as American now? Yeah, unironically. He's been in America since before HotS. | ||
|
anonymitylol
Canada4477 Posts
On July 01 2013 04:18 MrSourGit wrote: ![[image loading]](http://postimg.org/image/8n81i119h/) Wtf , NaNiWa and Polt havent played , why does it say 2-0 to Polt ? lol Because Polt beat him 2-0 yesterday, and MLG still has their god awful extended series rule | ||
|
scypio
Poland2127 Posts
On July 01 2013 04:14 AgentW wrote: When it's explained like this, it seems so much more nonsensical. This is pretty simple, you get an advantage for not dropping a series on your way up to the semis: - if you met the guy before you get the score from your previous match (2:0 or 2:1 in your favor) - if you did not meet the guy before you can end it quickly by winning 2 out of first 3 maps. This makes a lot of sense for me. | ||
Shellshock
United States97276 Posts
On July 01 2013 04:18 MrSourGit wrote: Wtf , NaNiWa and Polt havent played , why does it say 2-0 to Polt ? lol Extended series. Polt beat Naniwa 2-0 in the winners' bracket. the rematch is a bo7 with Polt starting with that 2-0 lead | ||
|
Qwerty85
Croatia5536 Posts
| ||
|
YourHarry
United States1152 Posts
| ||
|
Disengaged
United States6994 Posts
On July 01 2013 04:17 SarcasmMonster wrote: What category does Polt fall under? Do we unironically count him as American now? Not Esf because hes not on a Esf team | ||
|
DamageControL
United States4222 Posts
| ||
Olli
Austria24422 Posts
| ||
|
Hrrrrm
United States2081 Posts
| ||
|
DrPandaPhD
5188 Posts
On July 01 2013 04:18 MrSourGit wrote: Wtf , NaNiWa and Polt havent played , why does it say 2-0 to Polt ? lol Naniwa played polt earlier in this tournament. And because of a stupid rule (extended series) it means people who have played each other, when they face again they continue their series. Which means Polt starts next match 2-0 | ||
|
Shikyo
Finland33997 Posts
That's not even that bad. I'd say that this extended series is more advantageous for naniwa than a normal double elimination system would be | ||
|
MrSourGit
England135 Posts
On July 01 2013 04:18 Shellshock1122 wrote: Extended series. Polt beat Naniwa 2-0 in the winners' bracket. the rematch is a bo7 with Polt starting with that 2-0 lead Thanks , i only jsut read it , your a quick dam responder  !!! | ||
| ||
