EPT[Code S] RO8 Day 1 WCS Korea Season 1 2013 - Page 116
| Forum Index > StarCraft 2 Tournaments |
|
ppshchik
United States862 Posts
| ||
|
rj rl
648 Posts
On May 15 2013 09:48 HolyArrow wrote: Lol so what? Innovation got stomped in PL yesterday by someone he had no business losing to. And if Innovation made Parting look like a diamond player, then what does that make Flash, who Parting 2-0'd? just for the sake of truth I reply to you: it's not the score that does make you look like a diamond, not even the result (as you can always lose in a close fight like losira did yesterday), but the way game goes and in that sense bogus really outclassed life which is being referred as "made him look like a diamond". | ||
|
YourHarry
United States1152 Posts
Add: Bomber and Symbol are lucky, that they aren't facing a Kespa ...... | ||
|
HolyArrow
United States7116 Posts
On May 15 2013 10:31 rj rl wrote: just for the sake of truth I reply to you: it's not the score that does make you look like a diamond, not even the result (as you can always lose in a close fight like losira did yesterday), but the way game goes and in that sense bogus really outclassed life which is being referred as "made him look like a diamond". That's a convenient way out because there's no analysis or objectivity here. It's just "Oh, I felt like he made Life look like a diamond player because of the way the game went". Innovation played like crap against Turn, and given that, I could easily claim that Turn made Innovation look like a diamond player and you'd have no concrete way of disproving me because it's just an opinion. What IS objective is the score and the result. | ||
|
Havik_
United States5585 Posts
 Atleast SoS made it through, so there's a chance of a Protoss winning. I'm rooting for Bomber from here on out though. I don't give 2 shits if people think he's the weakest player on that half of the bracket. | ||
|
Bagration
United States18282 Posts
On May 15 2013 05:51 Maghetti wrote: Why did I find so much hate in the thread for shy not playing standard? lol The whole appeal of his play is that it is so unique and yet super solid. This is the sc2 version of someone getting mad someone cross dresses or something "how dare you be different!" the guy has been dominating in proleague and went b < a < s and straight to ro4 and could still make the finals if he beats SK. | ||
|
Taipoka
Brazil1224 Posts
This thread is already on "infinite argumentation." | ||
|
rj rl
648 Posts
On May 15 2013 10:40 HolyArrow wrote: That's a convenient way out because there's no analysis or objectivity here. It's just "Oh, I felt like he made Life look like a diamond player because of the way the game went". Innovation played like crap against Turn, and given that, I could easily claim that Turn made Innovation look like a diamond player and you'd have no concrete way of disproving me because it's just an opinion. What IS objective is the score and the result. ok here you go, the score and result atm is: 3/4 semifinalists are kespa? omg omg stomping | ||
|
Confuse
2238 Posts
Anyway I miss interviews, they made the players come to life for me :'( I really wanted to hear soulkey's thoughts after that 4th game, as well as SoS before round 5. | ||
|
HolyArrow
United States7116 Posts
On May 15 2013 11:18 rj rl wrote: ok here you go, the score and result atm is: 3/4 semifinalists are kespa? omg omg stomping What's also objective is how close the matches were. You clearly don't want to have a rational discussion considering all the factors and instead just want to mindlessly push your "Kespa stomping everyone" agenda even though I find it hilarious that one can use the word "stomp" in light of such close series. | ||
|
Daswollvieh
5553 Posts
| ||
|
bittman
Australia8759 Posts
On May 15 2013 14:59 Daswollvieh wrote: Maybe eSF vs Kespa is the new caster bashing / balance whine to be moderated preemptively. Would sure be a nice signal, but I doubt it will happen. I guess some kind of comparing dicks of other people is bound to happen, so why not this way. Progression went something like Balance whine -> Caster bashing -> Balance whine -> foreigners suck -> balance whine -> HuK's not a foreigner anymore -> balance whine -> foreigners suck again except all these counter examples because GSL -> balance whine & caster bashing -> ForGG the elephant -> balance whine -> Rain the elephant -> balance whine -> kespa vs esf -> HotS balance whine -> HotS "the reset" kespa vs esf I feel the above is a historical depiction of LR threads for starcraft 2. We'll move on when there's new balance to whine about. | ||
|
Daswollvieh
5553 Posts
On May 15 2013 15:25 bittman wrote: Progression went something like Balance whine -> Caster bashing -> Balance whine -> foreigners suck -> balance whine -> HuK's not a foreigner anymore -> balance whine -> foreigners suck again except all these counter examples because GSL -> balance whine & caster bashing -> ForGG the elephant -> balance whine -> Rain the elephant -> balance whine -> kespa vs esf -> HotS balance whine -> HotS "the reset" kespa vs esf I feel the above is a historical depiction of LR threads for starcraft 2. We'll move on when there's new balance to whine about. So if I understand this correctly, the current esf vs kespa "discussion" is because David Kim refuses to fix the bunker.  | ||
|
largehadroncollider
United States88 Posts
| ||
nimdil
Poland3748 Posts
On May 15 2013 14:59 Daswollvieh wrote: Maybe eSF vs Kespa is the new caster bashing / balance whine to be moderated preemptively. Would sure be a nice signal, but I doubt it will happen. I guess some kind of comparing dicks of other people is bound to happen, so why not this way. KeSPA vs eSF is pretty entertaining storyline. Of course it won't be if KeSPA will start lol-stomping eSF players but I guess that's not happening anytime soon, even if KeSPA people are a bit ahead ATM. | ||
|
geokilla
Canada8244 Posts
| ||
| ||
