EPT[GSL] Aug Code S RO16 Day 2 - Page 241
| Forum Index > StarCraft 2 Tournaments |
|
crawlingchaos
Canada2025 Posts
| ||
|
blooddrunKK
Mexico222 Posts
Puzzle played so great and that happens. Pretty good last battle by ryung tho! | ||
|
lee365
United States448 Posts
On August 24 2011 20:29 pycho wrote: did terran seriously had 20 scvs the whole game and was able to outmacro puzzle? Toss only had 20 something probes too | ||
|
mlevar
Slovenia266 Posts
| ||
|
Garnet
Vietnam9055 Posts
| ||
|
Mercury-
Great Britain804 Posts
| ||
|
firehand101
Australia3152 Posts
On August 24 2011 20:28 Tomasy wrote: this game looks like this for me  ![[image loading]](http://i.imgur.com/aCvNO.jpg) lololol so true | ||
|
pycho
Paraguay372 Posts
User was temp banned for this post. | ||
|
Xayoz
Estonia373 Posts
Nice game. | ||
|
youngminii
Australia7514 Posts
puzzle comeback | ||
|
TheHova
United Kingdom2612 Posts
On August 24 2011 20:29 pycho wrote: did terran seriously had 20 scvs the whole game and was able to outmacro puzzle? Yup, mules. Good unit . | ||
|
Doomwish
438 Posts
| ||
|
sjperera
Canada349 Posts
| ||
|
mcc
Czech Republic4646 Posts
| ||
|
kodas
United States418 Posts
| ||
|
TT1
Canada10079 Posts
| ||
|
Zaurus
Singapore676 Posts
| ||
|
minhbq299
United Kingdom566 Posts
On August 24 2011 20:27 Immersion_ wrote: This and Yaotzins post are kind of ignoring/missing my point, it isn't the question of what Ryung did, it was the fact Puzzle didn't know what Ryung was doing and still elected to do the build he did, despite the large possibility of a 1-1-1 (though this map is somewhat big), so...does Puzzle believe his build is safe? I doubt he's going into the game like oh lol if he 1-1-1s i'll just die... Did he win? | ||
|
Dommk
Australia4865 Posts
On August 24 2011 20:28 Tomasy wrote: this game looks like this for me LOL User was warned for this post | ||
|
TheRPGAddict
United States1403 Posts
On August 24 2011 20:30 Supamang wrote: He is, but idk if it could be said based off that game. actually, Ryung is pretty damn good. dunno what youre talking about | ||
| ||
.
