|
Okay we're going to start cracking down on people bashing players for no reason. You don't have to like every player, but at least show some respect. (as of page 402) |
On June 04 2011 23:58 ExquisiteRed wrote: Naniwa is 3-0 in his group but the group standings have jim down as 2-1 for some reason, he beat slush 2-0
He lost to slush 2-1.
|
On June 04 2011 23:58 thirnaz wrote:Show nested quote +On June 04 2011 23:55 Vansetsu wrote:On June 04 2011 23:50 dartoo wrote:On June 04 2011 23:40 Anda wrote:Cutest player in the tourney and favorite to win? Haha..that guy reminds of the day9 daily 100 story, When they met this little guy, who was like "did you guys know there is this cool strategy where you can drop vultures behind the mineral line and kill the workers!". Is there really a big audience for fps's? I'm sure playing is fun..but watching..? Well, a long time ago, I played CS:S and H1 competitively. H1 was probably best for spectators (and worst for players), as many organizer would just assume the best idea was to throw everyone (each team) on one giant tv or projector.... I can't tell you how much I would rage having to turn my head 30 degrees just trying to hit a shot... I dont mean this in a rude way but has CS:S ever been competative? Never seen a tournament with CSS in it :s
go watch esl right now, it's in the german EPS
|
On June 04 2011 23:57 Shagg wrote:Show nested quote +On June 04 2011 23:55 pieman819 wrote:On June 04 2011 23:54 Jyvblamo wrote:On June 04 2011 23:53 Derez wrote:On June 04 2011 23:49 Domination wrote:On June 04 2011 23:48 PartyBiscuit wrote:I'm now watching Halo...the messages worked  They are yelling GET THE BOMB GET THE BOMB and all I can think is "man bomber must have had the shittiest 24 hours a couple days ago." Also a great use of voice chat when you're basicly repeating the game's entire objective every 10 seconds. DESTROY ALL ENEMY BUILDINGS DESTROY ALL- MANY WHELPS LEFT SIDE MOAR DOTS
HOW DID YOU FROM FROM THE LEFT SIDE, TO THE MIDDLE!, TO THE FUCKING WHELPS!? ITS NOT EVEN REMOTLY POSSIBLE!
|
On June 04 2011 23:58 ExquisiteRed wrote: Naniwa is 3-0 in his group but the group standings have jim down as 2-1 for some reason, he beat slush 2-0 Someone said mlg's tweeted that slush won.
|
On June 04 2011 23:58 ExquisiteRed wrote: Naniwa is 3-0 in his group but the group standings have jim down as 2-1 for some reason, he beat slush 2-0 According to MLG, he lost to slush 1-2.
|
can someone plz tellme why idra vs mc playing again? or im watching "vod" lol :D ?
|
flag stolen, flag droppen, flag taken, flag stolen, flag dropped, flag dropped, flag taken, flag droppen, flag stolen... its becoming weird.
|
|
On June 04 2011 23:55 Vansetsu wrote:Show nested quote +On June 04 2011 23:50 dartoo wrote:On June 04 2011 23:40 Anda wrote:Cutest player in the tourney and favorite to win? Haha..that guy reminds of the day9 daily 100 story, When they met this little guy, who was like "did you guys know there is this cool strategy where you can drop vultures behind the mineral line and kill the workers!". Is there really a big audience for fps's? I'm sure playing is fun..but watching..? Well, a long time ago, I played CS:S and H1 competitively. H1 was probably best for spectators (and worst for players), as many organizer would just assume the best idea was to throw everyone (each team) on one giant tv or projector.... I can't tell you how much I would rage having to turn my head 30 degrees just trying to hit a shot...
If that was the situation, you weren't actually playing competitively. You do know that MLG got their start on Halo 1, right? 27" CRTs w/ quad split were the norm.
|
I get some weird beeeeeeeeeep.whats happening?
|
EMMMMMMMM ELLLLLLLLLL GEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE
|
On June 04 2011 23:58 ExquisiteRed wrote: Naniwa is 3-0 in his group but the group standings have jim down as 2-1 for some reason, he beat slush 2-0
no he didn't.
|
On June 04 2011 23:58 ExquisiteRed wrote: Naniwa is 3-0 in his group but the group standings have jim down as 2-1 for some reason, he beat slush 2-0
Yeah, standings are not up2date. Some times they are incorrect.
|
On June 05 2011 00:00 GiftPflanZe wrote: I get some weird beeeeeeeeeep.whats happening? Check your fire alarms.
|
On June 04 2011 23:59 Andamanen wrote:Show nested quote +On June 04 2011 23:58 ExquisiteRed wrote: Naniwa is 3-0 in his group but the group standings have jim down as 2-1 for some reason, he beat slush 2-0 According to MLG, he lost to slush 1-2. from root's twitter Um no for all of you correcting me last night I sat there with my very own eyes and saw slush>nani 2-1
|
On June 04 2011 23:59 ambient_orange wrote: can someone plz tellme why idra vs mc playing again? or im watching "vod" lol :D ?
Look at the bottom you can fast forward so... vod
|
On June 04 2011 23:59 Andamanen wrote:Show nested quote +On June 04 2011 23:58 ExquisiteRed wrote: Naniwa is 3-0 in his group but the group standings have jim down as 2-1 for some reason, he beat slush 2-0 According to MLG, he lost to slush 1-2. Working to TL twitter, Nani won lol
|
On June 04 2011 23:58 ExquisiteRed wrote: Naniwa is 3-0 in his group but the group standings have jim down as 2-1 for some reason, he beat slush 2-0 This type of results confusion has been around for ages. Why is it that hard to properly report results I do not understand.
|
|
On June 04 2011 23:58 ExquisiteRed wrote: Naniwa is 3-0 in his group but the group standings have jim down as 2-1 for some reason, he beat slush 2-0 This was answered like 1203497 times, he did lose to Slush 2-1 and he is 2-1 in his group and so is Slush.
|
|
|
|