Yes the lag didn't occur in battles but if you've played in a game that spikes every 5-10 seconds it's really frustrating and screws up your rhythm and macro a lot. I disagree with what incontrol said about the "no excuses" thing, though lag may not have decided the game but it definitely contributed to the result.

mordk

Chile8385 Posts

April 21 2011 04:45 GMT

#2908

On April 21 2011 13:43 Whitewing wrote:
Rainbow just made bad attacks, lag wasn't the factor.

Not so sure about this, he might have made poor decisions influenced by lag-induced rage. It was pretty sad.

Captain Peabody

United States3110 Posts

April 21 2011 04:45 GMT

#2909

Let's go ARTOSIS! Show us those mad PvP skills you've been saving up...

Dawski

Canada435 Posts

April 21 2011 04:45 GMT

#2910

lag or not we have to remember that all these korean players agreed to the lag beforehand

rawrjaaaaay

United States426 Posts

April 21 2011 04:45 GMT

#2911

0/3 on my liquibets. Damn...

bronzeterran

United States296 Posts

April 21 2011 04:45 GMT

#2912

Going to grab an old stuffed animal to cry into while Artosis gets his waffles buttered

Logo2010

509 Posts

April 21 2011 04:45 GMT

#2913

On April 21 2011 13:43 ComusLoM wrote:
That lag wasn't the reason rainbow lost. He made a terrible attack that would always have resulted in a loss regardless of lag.

Yeah lag had no effect whatsoever ....

Why don't TSL do live casting? Then you will actually see the lag like the last game instead of casting from replays.

Aequos

Canada606 Posts

April 21 2011 04:45 GMT

#2914

On April 21 2011 13:44 Goibon wrote:

Show nested quote +

over 4 hours til GSL, you've got time for a nap!!!

He's right, it is PvP - I'm betting on about 20 minutes to finish up these 3 games total.

MajorityofOne

Canada2506 Posts

April 21 2011 04:45 GMT

#2915

On April 21 2011 13:44 SKtheAnathema wrote:
i'd say why bother even entering online cross-world tournaments, but $15k prize is too good to pass up even with horrendous lag :\

You mean 50k, yes?

Al Bundy

7257 Posts

April 21 2011 04:45 GMT

#2916

On April 21 2011 13:44 s4life wrote:

Show nested quote +

He should be upset at his failed cheese... lag did not decide anything here..

Ok thanks for clarifying. Didn't get to see the whole game.

DizzySheep

Australia1144 Posts

April 21 2011 04:45 GMT

#2917

On April 21 2011 13:44 s4life wrote:

Show nested quote +

He should be upset at his failed cheese... lag did not decide anything here..

2 rax is quite standard on a 2p map..what cheese?

Mios

United States686 Posts

April 21 2011 04:45 GMT

#2918

even if there weren't constant spikes, there was still a bad delay the entire game for rainbow
another series ruined by lack of LAN option. Really wish we could have neutral hosts over a virtual LAN in SC2 like Garena in Wc3 and iCCup in BW. These international tournaments are really suffering because of it.

roliax

135 Posts

April 21 2011 04:45 GMT

#2919

Not saying lag caused rainbow to lose, but lag impacts the game more than what incontrol is saying. Even if it does not directly impact the gameplay, it does a lot to you mentally and makes you constantly frustrated at something you shouldn't be.

Corrik

United States1416 Posts

April 21 2011 04:45 GMT

#2920

On April 21 2011 13:43 TheTenthDoc wrote:
That lag must have tilted Rainbow, just lag is no excuse for that first push onto creep where his whole army got enveloped and crushed.

The game was already by that point. He couldn't micro his marines and lost his basically all-in bunker rush at that point. The first attack didn't matter because he either attacked there and won the game or the game was over. However, the game was over because his first attack couldn't have won either.

If you want to not blame the lag, then your argument has to be Sheth scouting the forward barracks won the game. The first push meant nothing in the scheme of the game.