[GSL] S3 Ro32 Day 2 - Page 66
Forum Index > StarCraft 2 Tournaments |
RageBot
Israel1530 Posts
| ||
xevis
United States218 Posts
| ||
HollowLord
United States3862 Posts
| ||
klauz619
453 Posts
On November 29 2010 20:26 eNbee wrote: Fruitdealer would've gotten crushed if SC actually had bio micro of a GSL-worthy level -_- I mean all he did was stop his marauders and studderstep his marines, no splitting in the slightest... Yes having 200apm splits with battlenet's forced 150ms latency vs right-click moving banelings should be the standard. | ||
Censured
Czech Republic1059 Posts
On November 29 2010 20:24 HwangjaeTerran wrote: Yeah I don't understand why they have to carry the gas in those canisters when every Terran would simply put a pipe there... -...the game is broken ![]() This reminds me of "...why protoss can't lift off nexus? they are supposed to be more advanced then terran" :D | ||
Telcontar
United Kingdom16710 Posts
On November 29 2010 20:26 skronch wrote: ugh i don't want to see these interviews....I WANT RET Soak in the manly voice of the fruit like any true fan of sc2 would. | ||
papaz
Sweden4149 Posts
| ||
pyro19
6575 Posts
On November 29 2010 20:24 Sadistx wrote: Playing a worse terran is actually more dangerous. Helloooo marine+20 scv allin ! Quite True. Imagine if Scfou had Allined with 20scvs+6 marines every time.Its very Micro intensive and hard to stop. | ||
Scorch
Austria3371 Posts
| ||
IMBAkorean
Canada835 Posts
| ||
dapierow
Serbia1316 Posts
| ||
Firereaver
India1701 Posts
| ||
beetoo
Sweden92 Posts
| ||
GiftPflanZe
Germany623 Posts
| ||
dubRa
2165 Posts
| ||
Jyvblamo
Canada13788 Posts
| ||
MLG_Wiggin
United States767 Posts
I'm just messing around though. FD completely deserves the win (and why so bad, scfou?) | ||
zak
Korea (South)1009 Posts
| ||
FirstQT
United States115 Posts
| ||
Shikyo
Finland33997 Posts
On November 29 2010 20:26 klauz619 wrote: It's laughable how banelings and zerglings are 4x more cost effective than marines after the 5 minute mark. Wait what? Actually marines are cost-efficient vs ling-baneling with some micro | ||
| ||