|
On February 20 2017 23:32 Damdred wrote:Show nested quote +On February 20 2017 23:30 Koshi wrote:On February 20 2017 23:27 Damdred wrote:On February 20 2017 23:20 raynpelikoneet wrote:
All the four of us can be town for now. I kinda think this is true currently Why do you townread rayn? Its a tone attitude thing and how he acted towards a couple of my things i posted. Its all fairly weak right now.
then why just quit the discussion here? We 4 are the only ones being active. Why not be 100% sure that we can trust each other and create a diamond town circle guarded by black bears with sharpened teeth?
So lazy to just go "well fuck it, you made a post, this guy made a post, that guy made a post, all town."
Not happy.
|
If it was just people made posts and I town read them for just posting you would have a point. However that is not what I am saying at all, Mal had a post I thought was bad. His reaction to my posts feel like a towny reaction, and his post in response to it how flippant and full of sash really makes me think he is town.
Rayn, reacted to a couple posts in a pretty controlled way, his tone/attitude and not really looking to buddy me when he had a chance made me lean town on him.
And you Koshi, I don't think you would care so much about being town read and you seem somewhat paranoid. Plus I liked you went against my opinon about Mal post being bad (in a way)
It is all day one weak ass shit, but a lot of this crap will end up being true.
|
I like you are active Damdred. But not a single readpost you made furthered the game. The only conversation you went into was asking rayn to be your friend and then add the malongo stuff behind it. Like... Bleghh.
You read on me was discussion ending. But it was early so fine I guess.
Your initial read on Malongo his post was very surface. When called out you were defensive and very generic.
Your flip on Malongo was instant, and you didn't reply on him calling you out. Which I don't like.
Your read on rayn is pre-emptive. and when called out on it you are generic and defensive.
##vote Damdred
Dnu. Not impressed.
|
On February 20 2017 23:39 Damdred wrote:
If it was just people made posts and I town read them for just posting you would have a point. However that is not what I am saying at all, Mal had a post I thought was bad. His reaction to my posts feel like a towny reaction, and his post in response to it how flippant and full of sash really makes me think he is town.
Rayn, reacted to a couple posts in a pretty controlled way, his tone/attitude and not really looking to buddy me when he had a chance made me lean town on him.
And you Koshi, I don't think you would care so much about being town read and you seem somewhat paranoid. Plus I liked you went against my opinon about Mal post being bad (in a way)
It is all day one weak ass shit, but a lot of this crap will end up being true.
Why not try to go in conversation more? He asked you a question. You ignore his question and call him town. Meh.
|
Also. Do I care about being townread?
|
I am unsure how anything i've done is defensive? Generic I can see since that is still where we are at? I've been asked to explain things so I have.
If Mal wishes to take offense to me ignoring him he can, but I answered his one question in it in another post so there really was no need to respond to him.
But you can continue to vote me idc, I won't be lynched so there is that.
|
On February 20 2017 22:46 Malongo wrote:Show nested quote +On February 20 2017 22:07 Damdred wrote:On February 20 2017 22:05 Malongo wrote:
Maybe we could make an ingame voting to decide previously if we actually want to lynch anyone today. I mean I have a 25% chance to hit a red randomly wich is not that bad. we are lnyching someone today no matter what I agree about lynching someone today, but I am not really sure it´s imperative. Can you please elaborate? Show nested quote +On February 20 2017 22:15 Damdred wrote:
So will we be friends this game rayn? Also I really dislike Molongo comment, it sort of pushes two anti-town sentiments (in this case) at the same time and both things he probably should know better than to do. And its not really commital at the same time, think its a bad post. First, my username is Malongo. Second, how is my proposal anti-town? While my post may not be commital (with wich I concur) I wonder what do you mean by "a bad post". Maybe you could enlight me with a good post full of content for a start. Show nested quote +On February 20 2017 22:11 raynpelikoneet wrote:
Ebwop: oh well, yes YOU would. But it doesnt make any sense to propose a random lynch where you exclude yourself. :p It makes all the sense to me actually :p.
Oh you meant this one, i thought he was talking about elaborating on a different point. Meh, this is just softball stuff you lynch to get information and figure out why people are pushing what they are. Not lynching lets mafia pick off the strong towns without town getting information on who they scum read
|
On February 20 2017 23:43 Damdred wrote:
1) I am unsure how anything i've done is defensive? Generic I can see since that is still where we are at? I've been asked to explain things so I have.
2) If Mal wishes to take offense to me ignoring him he can, but I answered his one question in it in another post so there really was no need to respond to him.
3) But you can continue to vote me idc, I won't be lynched so there is that.
1) It is defensive because you don't ask anything back. I ask you a question, you reply with something that ends our discussion. I ask you another question, you reply with something that ends our discussion.
--> Could be town. But I expect some more sass!
2) Don't overreact and do not twist my point. Malongo did not overreact at all. You didn't reply to him.
3) I don't want to lynch townies.
|
On February 20 2017 23:43 Koshi wrote:
Also. Do I care about being townread?
↑ Again no answer?
|
Obviously the answer is probably not.
That in no way is defensive? You just described someone answering a question.
I am not overreacting or twisting your point, I never said Mal did overact in fact he hasn't been back in the thread since that post. LIke this is a non point totally
|
On February 20 2017 23:57 Damdred wrote:
Obviously the answer is probably not.
That in no way is defensive? You just described someone answering a question.
I am not overreacting or twisting your point, I never said Mal did overact in fact he hasn't been back in the thread since that post. LIke this is a non point totally
I am actively reading, it`s just that it takes me more to make me readable to you guys. I have no offence if you want to ignore me, however I felt you stretched out the answer about the no lynching. Again, while I agree that it is desirable to lynch someone I think it`s not 100% imperative for day 1.
|
On February 20 2017 23:39 Damdred wrote:
If it was just people made posts and I town read them for just posting you would have a point. However that is not what I am saying at all, Mal had a post I thought was bad. His reaction to my posts feel like a towny reaction, and his post in response to it how flippant and full of sash really makes me think he is town.
Rayn, reacted to a couple posts in a pretty controlled way, his tone/attitude and not really looking to buddy me when he had a chance made me lean town on him.
And you Koshi, I don't think you would care so much about being town read and you seem somewhat paranoid. Plus I liked you went against my opinon about Mal post being bad (in a way)
It is all day one weak ass shit, but a lot of this crap will end up being true.
On February 20 2017 23:43 Koshi wrote:
Also. Do I care about being townread?
On February 20 2017 23:57 Damdred wrote:
Obviously the answer is probably not.
That in no way is defensive? You just described someone answering a question.
I am not overreacting or twisting your point, I never said Mal did overact in fact he hasn't been back in the thread since that post. LIke this is a non point totally
Dnu what you are doing. Like... I don't understand why your posts seem so forced and bullshittery in a game that hasn't even started yet.
http://i.imgur.com/twXvSCe.mp4
|
|
|
On February 20 2017 23:45 Damdred wrote:Show nested quote +On February 20 2017 22:46 Malongo wrote:On February 20 2017 22:07 Damdred wrote:On February 20 2017 22:05 Malongo wrote:
Maybe we could make an ingame voting to decide previously if we actually want to lynch anyone today. I mean I have a 25% chance to hit a red randomly wich is not that bad. we are lnyching someone today no matter what I agree about lynching someone today, but I am not really sure it´s imperative. Can you please elaborate? On February 20 2017 22:15 Damdred wrote:
So will we be friends this game rayn? Also I really dislike Molongo comment, it sort of pushes two anti-town sentiments (in this case) at the same time and both things he probably should know better than to do. And its not really commital at the same time, think its a bad post. First, my username is Malongo. Second, how is my proposal anti-town? While my post may not be commital (with wich I concur) I wonder what do you mean by "a bad post". Maybe you could enlight me with a good post full of content for a start. On February 20 2017 22:11 raynpelikoneet wrote:
Ebwop: oh well, yes YOU would. But it doesnt make any sense to propose a random lynch where you exclude yourself. :p It makes all the sense to me actually :p. Oh you meant this one, i thought he was talking about elaborating on a different point. Meh, this is just softball stuff you lynch to get information and figure out why people are pushing what they are. Not lynching lets mafia pick off the strong towns without town getting information on who they scum read
But the information we have day 1 is the weakest of all, if anything I am trying to get townie reads, not mafia reads. Maybe it could be smarter to lynch based activity wise instead?
|
On February 21 2017 00:19 Koshi wrote:Show nested quote +On February 20 2017 23:39 Damdred wrote:
If it was just people made posts and I town read them for just posting you would have a point. However that is not what I am saying at all, Mal had a post I thought was bad. His reaction to my posts feel like a towny reaction, and his post in response to it how flippant and full of sash really makes me think he is town.
Rayn, reacted to a couple posts in a pretty controlled way, his tone/attitude and not really looking to buddy me when he had a chance made me lean town on him.
And you Koshi, I don't think you would care so much about being town read and you seem somewhat paranoid. Plus I liked you went against my opinon about Mal post being bad (in a way)
It is all day one weak ass shit, but a lot of this crap will end up being true. Show nested quote +On February 20 2017 23:57 Damdred wrote:
Obviously the answer is probably not.
That in no way is defensive? You just described someone answering a question.
I am not overreacting or twisting your point, I never said Mal did overact in fact he hasn't been back in the thread since that post. LIke this is a non point totally Dnu what you are doing. Like... I don't understand why your posts seem so forced and bullshittery in a game that hasn't even started yet. http://i.imgur.com/twXvSCe.mp4
I really don't even understand the point being made by you tbh
|
On February 21 2017 00:21 Malongo wrote:Show nested quote +On February 20 2017 23:45 Damdred wrote:On February 20 2017 22:46 Malongo wrote:On February 20 2017 22:07 Damdred wrote:On February 20 2017 22:05 Malongo wrote:
Maybe we could make an ingame voting to decide previously if we actually want to lynch anyone today. I mean I have a 25% chance to hit a red randomly wich is not that bad. we are lnyching someone today no matter what I agree about lynching someone today, but I am not really sure it´s imperative. Can you please elaborate? On February 20 2017 22:15 Damdred wrote:
So will we be friends this game rayn? Also I really dislike Molongo comment, it sort of pushes two anti-town sentiments (in this case) at the same time and both things he probably should know better than to do. And its not really commital at the same time, think its a bad post. First, my username is Malongo. Second, how is my proposal anti-town? While my post may not be commital (with wich I concur) I wonder what do you mean by "a bad post". Maybe you could enlight me with a good post full of content for a start. On February 20 2017 22:11 raynpelikoneet wrote:
Ebwop: oh well, yes YOU would. But it doesnt make any sense to propose a random lynch where you exclude yourself. :p It makes all the sense to me actually :p. Oh you meant this one, i thought he was talking about elaborating on a different point. Meh, this is just softball stuff you lynch to get information and figure out why people are pushing what they are. Not lynching lets mafia pick off the strong towns without town getting information on who they scum read But the information we have day 1 is the weakest of all, if anything I am trying to get townie reads, not mafia reads. Maybe it could be smarter to lynch based activity wise instead?
Well genrally speaking yeah the info d1 is the weakest but the motives are interesting. Nothing is set in stone so you get to see how people react what they push what wagons they hop on. Its a great time to really start looking at motivations behind things, I think we lynch scum slightly higher percent than random lynches here so there is that to.
|
On February 20 2017 22:09 raynpelikoneet wrote:
And we dont have 25% chance of lynching red by random. And i like my educated guess more than 25% anyways.
if I decide its more like a 50% chance. STATS
|
On February 20 2017 22:57 Koshi wrote:
I propose we all say how likely we are hitting mafia if we rng into the playerpool excluding ourselves.
For me it is 25%.
its below 25% acualy. If I recall someone posted a stat at how often one votes mafia and you were the lowest ;p
|
On February 20 2017 23:27 Damdred wrote:Show nested quote +On February 20 2017 23:20 raynpelikoneet wrote:
All the four of us can be town for now. I kinda think this is true currently
ya in a fantasy world with easter bunnies and lepricons
|
On February 20 2017 23:34 Koshi wrote:Show nested quote +On February 20 2017 23:32 Damdred wrote:On February 20 2017 23:30 Koshi wrote:On February 20 2017 23:27 Damdred wrote:On February 20 2017 23:20 raynpelikoneet wrote:
All the four of us can be town for now. I kinda think this is true currently Why do you townread rayn? Its a tone attitude thing and how he acted towards a couple of my things i posted. Its all fairly weak right now. then why just quit the discussion here? We 4 are the only ones being active. Why not be 100% sure that we can trust each other and create a diamond town circle guarded by black bears with sharpened teeth? So lazy to just go "well fuck it, you made a post, this guy made a post, that guy made a post, all town." Not happy.
becuase looking for excuses to townread each other is not how you find townreads
|
|
|
|
|
|
EPT
