Liquidmania Qualifier #1 - Page 94

On December 27 2016 21:24 disformation wrote:
[*] looks very suspicious by vca alone. votes dont lie

On December 27 2016 21:24 disformation wrote:
[*] Focused on a few ppl. Has mentions of most here and there, but pretty eh ish. Example: not much on LS at all.

On December 27 2016 21:24 disformation wrote:
[*] Focus on me for whatever reason all game long. waffle into defending into suspicion into case. Can indicate mafia agenda, esp in a game where ML are hard to get. hint for scum: if you want to ML me, do it early.

On December 27 2016 21:24 disformation wrote:
[*] Also constantly brings bad meta on me, but thats probably karma for me getting ExO_'s meta wrong.

On December 27 2016 21:24 disformation wrote:
[*] Because of these it doesnt really feel like he is playing the game on towns side. At all.

On December 27 2016 21:24 disformation wrote:
[*] The drunk post were pretty horrible as either alignment, too.

On December 27 2016 21:24 disformation wrote:
[*] The mindmeld with SL? Rels just accepted the mindmeld with thanks. Easy pocket easy game.

On December 27 2016 21:42 disformation wrote:
1) Sticks around a while to consolidate if majority is needed. Easy to do for scum, esp if all options are town.
2) Given his filter I am not sure why he doesnt want me over ExO_ lynched.
3) Seems pretty unwilling to reconsider things. More likely to come from scum.

On December 27 2016 21:42 disformation wrote:
1) Doesnt Check LS meta from the game where LS broke alignment despite saying so
2) Final post + vote on kmatt 20mins after HF posted a very good post in Kmatts defense
3) Implies he doesnt like Kmatt filter. Vote post includes only the wifom/no sense stuff and nothing from his filter.

On December 23 2016 10:32 Rels wrote:
Yeah Kmatt is scum.
The first dumbtell was so INCREDIBLY AWESOME he hsould have stopped there. 2 dumbtells in a row, on such stupidly easily verifiable things is too weird to be a coincidence.
His reads don't make sense. They are not logical. He's scumreading LS for an itneraction with exo, and that is it; he's saying himself that he's hedging a bet on it. He's saying rels / LS could be the team because ... no reason, just 'cause Koshi yelled about it.
He thinks Slam is town because "I simply don't believe mafia can afford to be this passive so far into the game. They need a ML and won't be sitting this cycle out. Especially with how things are flipping around the past hour or two.". This is a weird read, but most importantly the same situation to his main scumread too.
The only reason he thinks disfo is town is because of: "What stops me from marking you scum is that you defended Exo." This is a bad read, but that's not a problem for a noob to make a bad read: the problem is that AGAIN it applies to his main scumread.

On December 28 2016 07:40 sicklucker wrote:
rels your reactionary lazy play is kind of scummy bro

On December 27 2016 22:16 disformation wrote:
So Slam.
Super AFK. No idea what/where his reads are from. Wish he would have expanded on the LS/Kmatt thing yesterday.
Wish I knew who he was going to vote today. Wish he wouldnt have backed off of LS in one of the posts I quoted.

On December 27 2016 22:40 disformation wrote:
so. i think overall id prefer rels over slam.

Rels def. had something "wrong" in his D1 read progression. the super bad drunk posts. VCA points towards him, and he feels like he has a bit of an agenda going on.
Slam is just inactive as hell. I dont like him backing off of LS though. Feels a bit like a coinflip though. Can consolidate on him if I really have to.

On December 28 2016 02:33 sicklucker wrote:


why are you attacking slam when disinfo is mafia?

On December 28 2016 07:39 Rels wrote:
Actually that's a good point for me being town. I don't look bad as scum. Check out my last scumgame where I bus Tumblewood D2 and get a lot of towncred.

On December 28 2016 07:39 Rels wrote:
Same as above. I don't forget to mention my teammate as scum.

On December 28 2016 07:39 Rels wrote:
I don't see how me evolving my read on you if scum indicative. Your sarcastic comment doesn't change anything about it.

On December 28 2016 07:39 Rels wrote:
What bad meta ? You buddy a lot as scum. You bused FF in the dark tournamenet game and I think your also bused HTS.

On December 28 2016 07:39 Rels wrote:
Nope. I townread SL D1 because of the way he was posting, not because he said he mindmelded me. I started to be more doubtful afterwards 'cause he was pretty inactive after that. But now unless HF or Kmatt are ccing he's confirmed town.

On December 28 2016 07:39 Rels wrote:
1) yep I never had time to do that. Which again, is something so obviously scummy if LS ever flips that I would never do that as scum.
2) I didn't understand the HF post until he quoted it again later.
3) This makes no sense. I don't imply anything other than why I'm voting Kmatt in this post:

On December 28 2016 07:46 Rels wrote:

Meant to quote this post. Why are you so unsure about this choice ? It sounds way more straightforward reading your cases