Liquidmania Qualifier #1 - Page 10

On August 29 2016 17:38 disformation wrote:
I hate how everyone seems to think I am good at this game.
Also went through geripts walls and tried to add up his reads/comments via a point system:
(note that this is an interpretation)
-: bad post
+: good post
|: meh post

trfel: - - + -
disfo: + - -
tw: - - -
palmar: | - - -
scott: + -
vivax: +
koshi: +
hf: | +
TT: + - |
rb: -

mostly lines up with his actual reads at the end of his second wall.
kinda want him to explain why he doesnt think palmar is scum despite disliking a lot of palmars posts + the questions I asked earlier.

On August 29 2016 20:57 disformation wrote:
also geripts scumread on me is a bit weird.
His comments on me:




So where does the scum read on me even come from, the above doesn't seem very conclusive.
It is kinda hidden in the parts where he talks about HF. On HF's read on me:

Then he likes some on HF's posts:


Only mentions of HF, which lead to a TR on HF (after saying HF's case on me is NAI for HF) and apparently he is sheeping HF's case on me, cause I am not sure why he would think I am the most likely scum from the things he said on me?

The more I look at geripts post the more inorganic and constructed I think it is. Might also be written in this hard to follow/read way to look like work has been done and making ppl less likely to want to read it.

On August 30 2016 18:50 disformation wrote:
was skimming a bit through some tw and tt filters in other games.
tw doesn't really look like either his town or scum games imo.
for tt i need to find a recent town game. there are similarities to his scum play in shin megami tensai, but those are rather shallow imo. like his entry does look similar and his lists look similar.

On August 30 2016 21:01 disformation wrote:

I think that this is the scummiest thing to be posted as of yet this game.

On August 30 2016 21:05 disformation wrote:
voting vivax. will maybe write a case later.

On August 30 2016 21:15 disformation wrote:
ppl explaining their town reads on vivax might be cool.

On August 31 2016 00:04 disformation wrote:
blah. im not feeling the vivax lynch.

On September 01 2016 00:34 disformation wrote:
random tinfoil:
why is vivax only going after easy targets?
scott is know to get misslyched a ton (no offense) and geript has like no time to play.

On September 01 2016 01:11 disformation wrote:
plamar
has already been questioned and pressured about his vote. if scum not for his vote.
vote suspiciousness: low
tw:
the voting itself is fine. votes scott to save himself and then switches to rels cause he didn't think scott is scum. though this statement is very waffly:

Also has weird reads around eod, so he really needs to step it up D2.
vote suspiciousness: low-medium
koshi
really likes the tw lynch. switches after rels dun goofed. think koshis reactions are genuine and indicate he cared about the lynch. he also was on Rels earlier D1.
So I think this looks okay.
vote suspiciousness: low-medium
vivi
leads scott lynch all day. wasnt around at eod. so far looks perfectly fine and reasonable, but this post:

super confuses me. despite leading the scott wagon all day and not buckling with his vote he is a bit like "oh nah, I dont really care which one of the two gets lynchend."
Dunno. I would have expected him to care a bit more about scott? Or even if you scumread both, push a bit for the one who you think has the hgher chance to flip scum? Well, he never unvoted scott, but it kinda gets my paranoia going.
vote suspiciousness: medium
geript
had his long stretch of voting me despite giving me a bunch of town points in his latest batch.
and then votes dane? well it is in line with him having not much scum reads and these posts:


and I guess some ppl were considering dane sheannanies, but still feels a bit odd, to throw out a vote like this, when it is really close between TW and scott at the time.
That was the VC right before geripts vote:+ Show Spoiler +
still going to keep it at a medium, cause it lines up with his thought progression and he legit seems to be screwed on time.
vote suspiciousness: medium