EPTNewbie Student Mafia XXIII
| Forum Index > TL Mafia |
|
Stutters695
2610 Posts
| ||
|
Stutters695
2610 Posts
| ||
|
Stutters695
2610 Posts
| ||
|
Stutters695
2610 Posts
Anyway, as it stands I'd be all for a d1 Xata lynch. Pretty sure he's fooled me like the last 3 times he's been mafia and that's no good. | ||
|
Stutters695
2610 Posts
On September 24 2016 07:51 Xatalos wrote: Have I really been scum in 3 games with you? :D It feels like ages when I last could play scum. I have no idea. Its probably been at least a year, but that seems right. Seems like as solid a plan as any for d1. You down? | ||
|
Stutters695
2610 Posts
On September 24 2016 08:04 Xatalos wrote: Unfortunately, looks like you can't vote for yourself in this setup :/ To everyone else, this is why we should lynch him today. He's always one step ahead, we'll never catch him. On a more serious note, how does everyone feel about going with the scummiest of the inevitable inactives? Activity always seems to be a struggle in these games and I won't be lynchbait for once. | ||
|
Stutters695
2610 Posts
On September 24 2016 08:21 Jealous wrote: I'm usually pro-PL but it's too early to make such a decision. We need to see how others are posting. It's odd that you suggest this so early. This is how I get reactions (or saying something controversial then lurking and waiting for reactions, but you don't want that). Obviously I don't want to lynch a lurker though because I want to lynch Xata. | ||
|
Stutters695
2610 Posts
On September 24 2016 08:28 Calix wrote: You only got two responses before claiming it was a reaction-test? My dear Watson, the game is afoot. That does seem kind of counterproductive in retrospect. I think this is the part though where you guys debate if I'm terrible, trying to come off as terrible while scum or part of some master play. | ||
|
Stutters695
2610 Posts
On September 24 2016 08:39 Jealous wrote: Confused as to why you would intentionally create such a scenario in the first place if you acknowledge less than 5 minutes later that it was a terrible choice. It's not like you got any smarter in between then and now. I'm older and thus wiser. The findings are TBD btw. Rest assured, I have top men on it. If you had to guess, why do you think I did it? | ||
|
Stutters695
2610 Posts
On September 24 2016 09:06 DanelerH wrote: Not always. If it's at the beginning of the game, I have no reason to trust the claim. If it's later in the game, then I'll continue looking into other people, but keep a watch on the TPR claim (especially if there's a counter-claim, in which case one of them has to be Mafia). Sup what do you think of what I've done so far? | ||
|
Stutters695
2610 Posts
Hi town. How many games have you played in and any mafia¿ | ||
|
Stutters695
2610 Posts
On September 24 2016 09:43 DoYouHas wrote: Nevermind, I can just look it up myself. Calix and Xata read pretty townie to me. Don't know about you other 3 yet. If you want to, go ahead, but my style is highly dependent on my activity level. I'm very self-aware of my meta as well, which doesnt help. Town: more impulsive Very likely to tunnel, especially on someone who attacks me early Will defer to someone whose reads I respect(even if I don't think they're better than mine) when I don't know or know my lynch target won't happen. Lately I've been very stream of conscious oriented with my posting until I get pushed for the lack of quoted cases, then I dump everything I've been thinking. Everyone realizes I was town and I get killed a night or two later. As scum I try to emulate these things, but suck at pushing people except teammates. Haven't really played scum enough to see what other people catch me from. | ||
|
Stutters695
2610 Posts
Too early to have much better, but I would like to talk to Jealous and DH some more. | ||
|
Stutters695
2610 Posts
| ||
|
Stutters695
2610 Posts
On September 24 2016 11:46 SoulEaterQUEEN wrote: Interesting idea. What does this achieve? Last time I checked, voting for yourself is a lazy way of avoiding pressure, gives no info, doesn't get you reads. Unless you are schizo ^_^ Also hi there. I'm one of the newbs, this is my first on-site mafia, therefore I am not aware of the site meta. Also find it pointless to link off site meta examples personally. Too many players fall into the meta trap to conclude reads. Anyway this is shit fluff talking. Grill me, bake me, do whatever that makes you happy until my alignment cookie crumbles infront of you. I'll post my RVS vote, and call it a night. Emphasis mine. I'd lynch for this | ||
|
Stutters695
2610 Posts
I'll give you a hint, go read SEQs filter (9 posts). The one I quoted shows a clear lack of reading, even incredibly early in the game. I'm working another 2 hours, but if anyone has any questions fire away. No comment on the blue stuff, scum can try to figure it out on their own. | ||
|
Stutters695
2610 Posts
On September 25 2016 10:11 DoYouHas wrote: I am around Stutters. What are your thoughts on ptmc? I'll trade you for some on SEQ. I don't think ptmc is a better lynch before SEQ gets to respond. Voting me with his focus on Luna is super weird also. | ||
|
Stutters695
2610 Posts
On September 25 2016 11:02 DoYouHas wrote: SEQ does not bother me much at all. He reads like he jumped in with both feet and started rooting around. The line you bolded would be weak reasoning if he had actually gone after Xata or spread suspicion on him, but I don't think he did. He moves on pretty quickly and after talking about mafia in a pretty general sense (not unusual for someone new to forum mafia, especially with Jealous getting into it too) he seems to be scumhunting. You have picked a pretty early statement from him that does not, to me, hold the significance you are assigning it. All of his statements are from around that time. Not to mention the apologetic/cautious nature. Just kind of screams first time scum to me. | ||
|
Stutters695
2610 Posts
| ||
|
Stutters695
2610 Posts
| ||
| ||
