|
On October 01 2015 18:42 marvellosity wrote:
coolTLname was always one of the primary lynch targets?
like did he ever have less than 4-5 votes in the last couple hours
he was the primary lynch target before we started shifting over to scott, and he still was even then
Anyway in my last horrah of a defense , the argument against me that i haven't been reading thread is wrong. I may have misunderstood some things, Just like Marv did ! but ive clearly shown that i know exactly what has happened in this thread.
the whole scott thinig is moot because i was afk the last hour of the game , and who wouldnt vote to save themselves, Like think about it, i know im town, and a ton of ppl are voting up scott so.. does him being suspicious even matter?
I did not see the whole claim and counterclaim as i voted, but if i did i wouldve voted WAY sooner. Actually my vote didn't even count because i was late. (cuz i alrdy gave up an didnt care) Mafia would have made sure their vote would go in , before deadline.
|
aside from not knowing game irreverent information, (lets be real the whole time of scott claim and number of votes on me ? )
i've clearly shown a deep understanding as far as what's been being said in this game. Honestly i think i have the thread more memorized than anyone playing this game.
The TMI analysis on me, I dont agree with because im new for one so i dont even know what that meant
and i had decent evidence on rsoultin like her not voting for trfel , past game history as mafia etc. I mean to convince other people you have to be convinced yourself, right? Even if i was not 100% convinced rsoultin was town, i still think this is a bad mislynch so im gonna be like YEAH STOP VOTING RSOULTIN 100% TOWN U FUCKING IDIOTS
Its for political reasons not TMI reasons
|
On October 04 2015 04:47 rsoultin wrote:Show nested quote +On October 04 2015 04:46 coolTLname wrote:On October 01 2015 18:42 marvellosity wrote:
coolTLname was always one of the primary lynch targets?
like did he ever have less than 4-5 votes in the last couple hours
he was the primary lynch target before we started shifting over to scott, and he still was even then Anyway in my last horrah of a defense , the argument against me that i haven't been reading thread is wrong. I may have misunderstood some things, Just like Marv did ! but ive clearly shown that i know exactly what has happened in this thread. the whole scott thinig is moot because i was afk the last hour of the game , and who wouldnt vote to save themselves, Like think about it, i know im town, and a ton of ppl are voting up scott so.. does him being suspicious even matter? I did not see the whole claim and counterclaim as i voted, but if i did i wouldve voted WAY sooner. Actually my vote didn't even count because i was late. (cuz i alrdy gave up an didnt care) Mafia would have made sure their vote would go in , before deadline. it matters that you said scott was suspicious and now you're saying that's not actually why you voted him, yes
i still thought he was suspicious because i think big lists are suspicious when ur mostly afk thats basically it. He read me scum so obviously, being town i think thats odd. I think he read someone as town for the same reason he read me scum as well.
|
BUT THE TIMESTAMP of scotts claim AND THE NUMBER OF VOTES ON ME IS IRRELEVANT GAME INFORMATION. I doubt anyone here wouldve known that!
|
GB rels , i HOPE its you bc then my psychoanalysis would be awesome but otherwise i dont have a case against u lol
and the damdred CC im still @_@ on
LS seems way too aloof , watching worlds, claiming VT when theres a powershot,
|
On October 04 2015 04:54 MoosyDoosy wrote:Show nested quote +On October 04 2015 04:51 coolTLname wrote:
aside from not knowing game irreverent information, (lets be real the whole time of scott claim and number of votes on me ? )
i've clearly shown a deep understanding as far as what's been being said in this game. Honestly i think i have the thread more memorized than anyone playing this game.
The TMI analysis on me, I dont agree with because im new for one so i dont even know what that meant
and i had decent evidence on rsoultin like her not voting for trfel , past game history as mafia etc. I mean to convince other people you have to be convinced yourself, right? Even if i was not 100% convinced rsoultin was town, i still think this is a bad mislynch so im gonna be like YEAH STOP VOTING RSOULTIN 100% TOWN U FUCKING IDIOTS
Its for political reasons not TMI reasons If you have the thread memorized so well, why don't you go back and pull up evidence? You should know where they are. Instead of always going "I think" "maybe" "possibly" and changing your reads all the time.
I have been, for you i dont need to, bc ppl can just read your filter without context because you just analysis ed a bunch of people without pushing them, changing reads instead. Like ur the opposite of rayn which is also bad. Rayn is a necessary evil but unfortunately hes wrong this time.
|
|
|
20% of my posts are quotes like this , mostly earlier on. I have been, but sure ill say i could do more like re read day 1 to night 1 and piece together stuff. WHICH IM DOING but it'll take me like 30 minutes at least so id rather do that before deadline and just see where this conversation goes
|
On October 04 2015 04:59 Damdred wrote:
Still haven't explained why I'm scum on any reasonable world.
Onto shining, if you've played with shining before it doesn't really matter how much work he does because he's always going to be hit and miss on the activity front its just the way it is.
And I don't think its compelling at all, and he did a decent amount d1 in a small time span he wasn't super active for the first like 30 hours of the game or something. So its all pretty much in line.
Burst of anger at beginning, Counterclaim shady, Being present in thread yet not contributing anything especially day 2
|
On October 02 2015 11:31 The Shining wrote:Show nested quote +On October 02 2015 10:47 Damdred wrote:
How about use real reasons to scum read me instead of wifom to the first part and actual reasons for the second. Lol that lurk tho
|
On October 04 2015 05:04 raynpelikoneet wrote:Show nested quote +On October 04 2015 05:02 coolTLname wrote:On October 04 2015 04:59 Damdred wrote:
Still haven't explained why I'm scum on any reasonable world.
Onto shining, if you've played with shining before it doesn't really matter how much work he does because he's always going to be hit and miss on the activity front its just the way it is.
And I don't think its compelling at all, and he did a decent amount d1 in a small time span he wasn't super active for the first like 30 hours of the game or something. So its all pretty much in line. Burst of anger at beginning, Counterclaim shady, Being present in thread yet not contributing anything especially day 2 His counterclaim is shady only if you are mafia. 100%.
except he didnt get powershot, possibly of 2 trackers , GB claiming roleblocker then backing off (idk what this means actually )
Yes and u seem to think im mafia 100% so why arent u pushing damdred like a motherfucking train?
|
I know! its because underneath all your anger, you actually think i could be town and ur waiting until i flip to save energy. :D
|
On October 04 2015 05:08 Damdred wrote:
Idk how you can say I'm not doing some things? I'm just not involved in pointless bickering I suppose.
Yeah well when the whole town thinks im mafia i guess they can kind of chill. Rsoultin and Trfel think im town, and theyve been frantically active. So i give bonus townie points to these two. Anyway i think deadline is couple hours so i will break then come back with some analysis
GL, u will need 3 perfect lynches to win imo
|
On October 04 2015 05:09 MoosyDoosy wrote:Show nested quote +On October 04 2015 05:08 coolTLname wrote:
I know! its because underneath all your anger, you actually think i could be town and ur waiting until i flip to save energy. :D If you're alive, you're a liability to town. Also find it funny that you're the sc2mafia role mechanics dude and you don't know what a roleblocker is.
never said that, i just dont know what it MEANS for GB to claim then back off. and there may or may not be a roleblocker in the game
|
On October 04 2015 05:11 raynpelikoneet wrote:Show nested quote +On October 04 2015 05:06 coolTLname wrote:On October 04 2015 05:04 raynpelikoneet wrote:On October 04 2015 05:02 coolTLname wrote:On October 04 2015 04:59 Damdred wrote:
Still haven't explained why I'm scum on any reasonable world.
Onto shining, if you've played with shining before it doesn't really matter how much work he does because he's always going to be hit and miss on the activity front its just the way it is.
And I don't think its compelling at all, and he did a decent amount d1 in a small time span he wasn't super active for the first like 30 hours of the game or something. So its all pretty much in line. Burst of anger at beginning, Counterclaim shady, Being present in thread yet not contributing anything especially day 2 His counterclaim is shady only if you are mafia. 100%. except he didnt get powershot, possibly of 2 trackers , GB claiming roleblocker then backing off (idk what this means actually ) Yes and u seem to think im mafia 100% so why arent u pushing damdred like a motherfucking train? Because in my world Damdred is not mafia anyways. But in your world, like you probably assume you are town right? scott was town. Why does Damdred claim when you two are the only possible lynches? Town is gonna get lynched anyways. For you there should be 0% reason to think Damdred is mafia jsut because you are supposed to know your own alignment. Not to even mention this is straight up "role interaction" where you are supposed to be "good at" because sc2mafia is nothing but THIS.
ive definitely never claimed to be good at sc2 mafia lol ive been playing lots for a couple weeks tho
|
its mostly bc of the powershot ability , sure there are many cases where mafia can choose not to use it, but not 0% like ur saying.
|
like whats the percent chance of mafia RB
|
|
|
and if i was mafia, wouldnt they just tell me to shut the fuck up after getting lynched day 1? Like if i was really that bad, as mafia, no one would want me to keep playing on their team. Like in poker, where u just muck your cards.
|
On October 04 2015 05:19 Damdred wrote:
Like id wager 92%-98% very seldom does mafia not gave a rb
well i thought it was 30% so there u go
|
|
|
|
|
|
EPT
