Mafia in the Himalayas - Page 11

On June 19 2015 05:21 KelsierSC wrote:


it was VA actually not me

I just talked about the Breshke case being bad

On June 19 2015 05:24 Fidei86 wrote:
@Kel I'm around, keeping tabs on the thread while I'm at work. For what it's worth, and it's probably not much, I agree with GB's sentiment here. A d1 lynch is pretty unlikely to succeed. In the last game I was in (HG) the top three wagons on d1 were all town. This game has been 20 times less likely to actually find a scum imo, given that we're almost at ninety pages after 2 days. PSA: People, your spam and OMGUS'ing is not helpful. You make it super easy for mafia just to blend in to the noise, and you make it super hard for townies (like me) to actually engage with what's going on. If you have a case, please MAKE IT, then let other people actually read it. Don't just keep spamming back and forth. If you're town, you're NEVER going to convince a mafia that they are mafia - they'll keep protesting their innocence until they are lynched. Same if they're town. The people you have to convince is everyone else, and frankly I'm just kind of turned off by all this.

So, back to GB - he's posting, people can get reads on him, and those reads will only get stronger and more accurate over time. Worst case if we don't lynch him is that he's mafia and we catch him later. However, if we do lynch him, we're missing the opportunity to lynch a scummy lurker. If you let the lurkers live, they just turn the later days into a coinflip for active town.

On June 19 2015 05:27 Holyflare wrote:
always lynch scummy people not lurkers unless the lurker is scummy in which case you're still lynching the scummy person

lynching active people also gives you incredible information post flip for people's reactions and stances to the wagon whereas a lurker lynch is a massive cop out and people can just free ride it to a mislynch if they are mafia

you say day 1 is the hardest day to succeed and that's because there is no flip information, day 2 would be the same with a lurker lynch

On June 19 2015 05:34 wherebugsgo wrote:


There seems to be this sort of implication here that what we've had so far is not serious.

What makes you say that the GB lynch has not been substantiated in serious discussion? Like 6-7 people have commented on it and we have a fairly wide array of perspectives and information that went into it. I put a chunk in re: GB's misrepresentation of my play, KSC pointed out how his Breshke case was terrible (speaking of Breshke, where the hell is he?) VA and Shockeyy pointed out elements of his meta that fit to his play here, and HF has provided his own opinions and corroboration of GB's play from previous games as well. Individually I think all of those pieces of information are pretty valuable and strong on their own, but together they are the strongest indication that we have the correct lynch for today.

OTOH when you look at the BF case it's mostly people just whining that they don't like his posting style and his activity. That doesn't really inspire confidence to me.

On June 19 2015 05:59 boxerfred wrote:

My vote actually is on someone, you must've missed my post where I say I'm really busy until the next day.
I'm not even lurking currently, I just skimmed through some pages and found your post sticking out so I want to point that out.

Note how it would be way easier for me to not say that.

On June 19 2015 06:02 LightningStrike wrote:

I didn't catch it all I thought you didn't vote at all I guess I was blind for a little bit but anyways HF isn't going to get lynched today do you mind reading Bugs case on GB on Page 82ish and give me your thoughts on it?

On June 19 2015 06:03 ritoky wrote:
I just want to say that regardless of who gets lynched here, if you're the cop and you don't investigate the other guy tonight....I am going to punch you in the genitalia.

On June 19 2015 06:31 Breshke wrote:
rso, what do you think about GB's case on me I have like no time tor ead the thread so please dont tell me to go look

On June 19 2015 06:37 rsoultin wrote:


LS, if you're townreading me bby this time sheep me

i'm about as certain as i can be that gb is not scum here...why do you think he's scum?

On June 19 2015 06:39 wherebugsgo wrote:
if GB and BF are both at 6 now... who dies?

BF was first to 6 but GB at some point had 7. I assume BF dies?

This is confusing

On June 19 2015 06:43 Holyflare wrote:


why are you intentionally being useless?

On June 19 2015 06:44 wherebugsgo wrote:
also jesus why does this GB lynch have so much resistance

On June 19 2015 06:47 KelsierSC wrote:
why do we still have 2 no votes with 15 minutes left

what the fuck are you guys doing

On June 19 2015 06:47 rsoultin wrote:
o.0 lol did gb just vote shockey?

On June 19 2015 06:47 ShoCkeyy wrote:


And he still hasn't fucking answered me? Don't you see? This is why I switched. I just posted it out flat for you and him to see why I switched my vote. It just drives me mad when a player can easily avoid me voting them by just answering my question. My read on GB was null as you can see... After he went off with his rage posts, I brought it up that he played just like that in the previous game where he was scum and a smurf... Now how is that weird that I vote for him?

On June 19 2015 06:49 Onegu wrote:



LS still needs to die. Dont worry I dont plan on being useless all game...

On June 19 2015 06:50 rsoultin wrote:
i'm okay with lynching shocckey but not if it kills gb

that's my stance the rest of y'all figure it out

On June 19 2015 06:50 Onegu wrote:



Bugs isnt thread captian

On June 19 2015 06:51 rsoultin wrote:


how about you try giant list of people he's willing to lynch well before this

you're just being ridiculous now