EPT
VII Titanic Mini Mafia: I Have a Cunning Plan... - Page 3
| Forum Index > TL Mafia |
|
Holyflare
United Kingdom30775 Posts
| ||
|
Blazinghand
United States25557 Posts
not clear if there is room. if there is, i'm in. | ||
|
LightningStrike
United States14277 Posts
On February 12 2015 06:11 Blazinghand wrote: /in not clear if there is room. if there is, i'm in. I finally get to play with the RNG king himself  | ||
|
Half the Sky
Germany9029 Posts
On February 12 2015 06:11 Blazinghand wrote: /in not clear if there is room. if there is, i'm in. Huzzah! Looking forward to our first game together... Watch him RNG his votes on scummers   | ||
|
Blazinghand
United States25557 Posts
| ||
|
raynpelikoneet
Finland43270 Posts
| ||
|
Blazinghand
United States25557 Posts
| ||
|
raynpelikoneet
Finland43270 Posts
On February 12 2015 07:18 Blazinghand wrote: wait, have I actually hit scum 22% of the time? cause if so that'd be sweet in the games have been in 0%. but itäs gonna be a pleasure to play with you! ^^ | ||
|
raynpelikoneet
Finland43270 Posts
| ||
|
rsoultin
Netherlands15308 Posts
On February 12 2015 01:40 justanothertownie wrote: He will never improve if you lie to him. Third partys suck in general. Then there is the awful deadline. Then there is the not rnged role distribution. Good. I wanted to take a break anyways. dude, him outlining a case using specific instances from meta that he quotes and analyzes is an improvement. lay off lol | ||
|
Blazinghand
United States25557 Posts
On February 12 2015 09:37 raynpelikoneet wrote: in the games have been in 0%. but itäs gonna be a pleasure to play with you! ^^ 0%? then I'm definitely due for it to work now | ||
|
raynpelikoneet
Finland43270 Posts
On February 12 2015 10:23 Blazinghand wrote: 0%? then I'm definitely due for it to work now don't worry if you "hit" twce you are in the range! | ||
|
rsoultin
Netherlands15308 Posts
| ||
|
Blazinghand
United States25557 Posts
On February 12 2015 10:32 rsoultin wrote: lol, you really stick to the RNG scumread, BH, or is it just a place to start at? Not only do I stick to the scumread, it's not too uncommon for me to actually successfully lynch them. I'm very talented at writing cases that convince readers even though they know the reason I'm writing is RNG. I think the times my RNG has landed on scum it's failed to push through though. | ||
|
rsoultin
Netherlands15308 Posts
On February 12 2015 10:38 Blazinghand wrote: Not only do I stick to the scumread, it's not too uncommon for me to actually successfully lynch them. I'm very talented at writing cases that convince readers even though they know the reason I'm writing is RNG. I think the times my RNG has landed on scum it's failed to push through though. that seems a little wild, lol, but if it works for you ^^ | ||
|
Blazinghand
United States25557 Posts
On February 12 2015 10:40 rsoultin wrote: that seems a little wild, lol, but if it works for you ^^ fwiw though legit RNGing the D1 lynch has a lot of positive benefits. You'd be surprised how well games with a D1 RNG lynch turn out. | ||
|
rsoultin
Netherlands15308 Posts
On February 12 2015 10:53 Blazinghand wrote: fwiw though legit RNGing the D1 lynch has a lot of positive benefits. You'd be surprised how well games with a D1 RNG lynch turn out. just to see how that player reacts under pressure, and how everyone else reacts? | ||
|
Blazinghand
United States25557 Posts
On February 12 2015 11:10 rsoultin wrote: just to see how that player reacts under pressure, and how everyone else reacts? Yeah, but also a 22% chance of lynching scum is pretty good. If we've already caught scum we don't need to worry about RNG. But if we're confused, then the RNG is great because a confused town usually is pushed into mislynching by scum-- the RNG is way better. Even better, RNG isn't subject to like, biases, weird rivalries, vet bitterness, hatred of newbies, or any of that stuff. RNG is pure and perfect. In fact, it's REALLY good in this game, which has 17 players, 5 of whom are scum. that's a 30% chance to lynch scum. That's frickin amazing | ||
|
rsoultin
Netherlands15308 Posts
On February 12 2015 11:19 Blazinghand wrote: Yeah, but also a 22% chance of lynching scum is pretty good. If we've already caught scum we don't need to worry about RNG. But if we're confused, then the RNG is great because a confused town usually is pushed into mislynching by scum-- the RNG is way better. Even better, RNG isn't subject to like, biases, weird rivalries, vet bitterness, hatred of newbies, or any of that stuff. RNG is pure and perfect. In fact, it's REALLY good in this game, which has 17 players, 5 of whom are scum. that's a 30% chance to lynch scum. That's frickin amazing lol, not to quibble, BH, but technically anyone voted, RNG or not, has a 30% chance of being scum minus outside factors xP not being subject to biases and rivalries and stuff I good, i'll admit, but it also doesn't incorporate any valid forms of analysis either, yeah? I've caught scum day 1 and I'm not that good lol. I think most players have. | ||
|
Blazinghand
United States25557 Posts
On February 12 2015 11:22 rsoultin wrote: lol, not to quibble, BH, but technically anyone voted, RNG or not, has a 30% chance of being scum minus outside factors xP not being subject to biases and rivalries and stuff I good, i'll admit, but it also doesn't incorporate any valid forms of analysis either, yeah? I've caught scum day 1 and I'm not that good lol. I think most players have. ಠ_ಠ ... if you're gonna use the argument that "technically any vote has a 30% chance of landing on scum" then you're gonna have to justify why not-RNG is better than RNG, since, according to you not-RNG has a 30% chance of landing on scum just like RNG. | ||
| ||
