|
On November 02 2014 06:56 ritoky wrote:Show nested quote +On November 02 2014 06:49 jrkirby wrote:Where the hell are BH and Misder? The longer they are gone, the scummier I feel they are. To me, damdred reads like bad town, cracking under pressure. You shouldn't care that he claims blue though, because it looks like all the reds are going to have random powers too. But overall, it doesn't read like scum, more like clueless town to me. + Show Spoiler [Crazy Theory, not important] +
Although I did for a second entertain a crazy theory - GlowingBear and Damdred are scumbuddies. GB pushes the Damd lynch day one, if it flips mafia he gets an easy rest of game. He's been on Damd's case since the beginning of the game literally.
why is risk.nuke not in that list anymore? has your scum read on him evaporated? if so, why?
No, I just forgot to mention him. I'd jump on risk in a second if I thought we could get majority. He's done almost absolutely nothing for town.
|
On November 02 2014 07:07 Blazinghand wrote:
Fair enough. Look at how GB has responded to RNG this game. Most people who don't like RNG just dismiss it, or call it bad (which eventually, it seeems he did). What GB isntead has done has said it was "disruptive" somehow (even though basically i was the only one voting along those lines) and responded with a counterattack against me. Is this how a town player, one who is familiar with RNG, would react? Why not just call RNG bad? Why not just call me scum for using RNG? Why call attention to the fact that RNG is disruptive to the town discourse, or say that it's unusually bad becuase it landed on him? This is not how my thought process would go if I were RNGed as town and I think it shows us that GB is scum.
It was probably OMGUS. That's what it looked like to me.
BH, who do you read as scum?
|
On November 02 2014 07:13 ritoky wrote:Show nested quote +On November 02 2014 07:06 jrkirby wrote:On November 02 2014 06:56 ritoky wrote:On November 02 2014 06:49 jrkirby wrote:Where the hell are BH and Misder? The longer they are gone, the scummier I feel they are. To me, damdred reads like bad town, cracking under pressure. You shouldn't care that he claims blue though, because it looks like all the reds are going to have random powers too. But overall, it doesn't read like scum, more like clueless town to me. + Show Spoiler [Crazy Theory, not important] +
Although I did for a second entertain a crazy theory - GlowingBear and Damdred are scumbuddies. GB pushes the Damd lynch day one, if it flips mafia he gets an easy rest of game. He's been on Damd's case since the beginning of the game literally.
why is risk.nuke not in that list anymore? has your scum read on him evaporated? if so, why? No, I just forgot to mention him. I'd jump on risk in a second if I thought we could get majority. He's done almost absolutely nothing for town. i just glanced through your filter. it seems you have or had scum reads on: LT, slam, GB, BH, misder and risk....that's 6 mafia reads....a couple i don't really feel are explained. as for your town reads...you have 1 on circumstance for being "level-headed" early on and no real mention of anything since... so my question here is, do you care who gets lynched or do you just care about lynching someone and being in the majority like you just stated?
I no longer have scum reads on slam or LT. I think HF is town, not sure about circumstance tbh. I don't think I ever said GB was scum. It's been closer to null all game for him. Could go either way with how he's playing.
If BH, misder or risk get lynched I wouldn't mind. BH's back in the thread so he might change my mind.
Anyone else - I need some serious convincing, but I much rather have somebody lynched than nobody lynched.
|
On November 02 2014 07:17 Damdred wrote:
Ok BH is town, hes actually catching up and giving thoughts on stuff. He shouldn't be the lynch today even though he called me inarticulate
You just like that he's defending you.
|
Also, one thing for clairification. Damdred breadcrumbed aldor and then it happened, and then he claimed, right?
Can someone quote or link these two posts for me, because I am sometimes a little slow about this.
|
On November 02 2014 08:31 Blazinghand wrote:Show nested quote +On November 02 2014 07:18 jrkirby wrote:On November 02 2014 07:13 ritoky wrote:On November 02 2014 07:06 jrkirby wrote:On November 02 2014 06:56 ritoky wrote:On November 02 2014 06:49 jrkirby wrote:Where the hell are BH and Misder? The longer they are gone, the scummier I feel they are. To me, damdred reads like bad town, cracking under pressure. You shouldn't care that he claims blue though, because it looks like all the reds are going to have random powers too. But overall, it doesn't read like scum, more like clueless town to me. On November 02 2014 07:18 jrkirby wrote: Show nested quote + I no longer have scum reads on slam or LT. I think HF is town, not sure about circumstance tbh. I don't think I ever said GB was scum. It's been closer to null all game for him. Could go either way with how he's playing. If BH, misder or risk get lynched I wouldn't mind. BH's back in the thread so he might change my mind. Anyone else - I need some serious convincing, but I much rather have somebody lynched than nobody lynched. what makes it a null game for GB? he's been making a lot of posts and that's convinced many people... but not you? you unvoted him earlier. can you explain why, or who your head honcho for lynching is? it seems like you're lost, and you don't know who to lynch. seems like you need something to guide you. something untouchable. something pure. something perfect. something policy. something like RNG + Show Spoiler [Crazy Theory, not important] +
Although I did for a second entertain a crazy theory - GlowingBear and Damdred are scumbuddies. GB pushes the Damd lynch day one, if it flips mafia he gets an easy rest of game. He's been on Damd's case since the beginning of the game literally.
why is risk.nuke not in that list anymore? has your scum read on him evaporated? if so, why? No, I just forgot to mention him. I'd jump on risk in a second if I thought we could get majority. He's done almost absolutely nothing for town. i just glanced through your filter. it seems you have or had scum reads on: LT, slam, GB, BH, misder and risk....that's 6 mafia reads....a couple i don't really feel are explained. as for your town reads...you have 1 on circumstance for being "level-headed" early on and no real mention of anything since... so my question here is, do you care who gets lynched or do you just care about lynching someone and being in the majority like you just stated? I no longer have scum reads on slam or LT. I think HF is town, not sure about circumstance tbh. I don't think I ever said GB was scum. It's been closer to null all game for him. Could go either way with how he's playing. If BH, misder or risk get lynched I wouldn't mind. BH's back in the thread so he might change my mind. Anyone else - I need some serious convincing, but I much rather have somebody lynched than nobody lynched. what makes it a null game for GB? he's been making a lot of posts and that's convinced many people... but not you? you unvoted him earlier. can you explain why, or who your head honcho for lynching is? it seems like you're lost, and you don't know who to lynch. seems like you need something to guide you. something untouchable. something pure. something perfect. something policy. something like RNG
So as I explained earlier, I only voted GB because I'd been convinced RNG was good. When I changed my mind on RNG, I changed my vote. GB is trying his hardest to get somebody lynched. Someone who he thinks is scummy. This is kinda townie. I just don't quite agree with all his reasonings.
If you want me to go back to a GB vote, you'll have to convince me that GB is actually scummy. I'm just not seeing it right now.
Right now, I think misder is the best lynch target. He was blue fishing, hasn't posted scumreads, and has been pretty AFK for the last day or so. If he wants to get ignored (a scummy thing), he's doing pretty well. Why wouldn't you lynch misder?
|
On November 02 2014 08:59 Blazinghand wrote:Show nested quote +On November 02 2014 08:58 jrkirby wrote:On November 02 2014 08:31 Blazinghand wrote:On November 02 2014 07:18 jrkirby wrote:On November 02 2014 07:13 ritoky wrote:On November 02 2014 07:06 jrkirby wrote:On November 02 2014 06:56 ritoky wrote:On November 02 2014 06:49 jrkirby wrote:Where the hell are BH and Misder? The longer they are gone, the scummier I feel they are. To me, damdred reads like bad town, cracking under pressure. You shouldn't care that he claims blue though, because it looks like all the reds are going to have random powers too. But overall, it doesn't read like scum, more like clueless town to me. On November 02 2014 07:18 jrkirby wrote: Show nested quote + I no longer have scum reads on slam or LT. I think HF is town, not sure about circumstance tbh. I don't think I ever said GB was scum. It's been closer to null all game for him. Could go either way with how he's playing. If BH, misder or risk get lynched I wouldn't mind. BH's back in the thread so he might change my mind. Anyone else - I need some serious convincing, but I much rather have somebody lynched than nobody lynched. what makes it a null game for GB? he's been making a lot of posts and that's convinced many people... but not you? you unvoted him earlier. can you explain why, or who your head honcho for lynching is? it seems like you're lost, and you don't know who to lynch. seems like you need something to guide you. something untouchable. something pure. something perfect. something policy. something like RNG + Show Spoiler [Crazy Theory, not important] +
Although I did for a second entertain a crazy theory - GlowingBear and Damdred are scumbuddies. GB pushes the Damd lynch day one, if it flips mafia he gets an easy rest of game. He's been on Damd's case since the beginning of the game literally.
why is risk.nuke not in that list anymore? has your scum read on him evaporated? if so, why? No, I just forgot to mention him. I'd jump on risk in a second if I thought we could get majority. He's done almost absolutely nothing for town. i just glanced through your filter. it seems you have or had scum reads on: LT, slam, GB, BH, misder and risk....that's 6 mafia reads....a couple i don't really feel are explained. as for your town reads...you have 1 on circumstance for being "level-headed" early on and no real mention of anything since... so my question here is, do you care who gets lynched or do you just care about lynching someone and being in the majority like you just stated? I no longer have scum reads on slam or LT. I think HF is town, not sure about circumstance tbh. I don't think I ever said GB was scum. It's been closer to null all game for him. Could go either way with how he's playing. If BH, misder or risk get lynched I wouldn't mind. BH's back in the thread so he might change my mind. Anyone else - I need some serious convincing, but I much rather have somebody lynched than nobody lynched. what makes it a null game for GB? he's been making a lot of posts and that's convinced many people... but not you? you unvoted him earlier. can you explain why, or who your head honcho for lynching is? it seems like you're lost, and you don't know who to lynch. seems like you need something to guide you. something untouchable. something pure. something perfect. something policy. something like RNG So as I explained earlier, I only voted GB because I'd been convinced RNG was good. When I changed my mind on RNG, I changed my vote. GB is trying his hardest to get somebody lynched. Someone who he thinks is scummy. This is kinda townie. I just don't quite agree with all his reasonings. If you want me to go back to a GB vote, you'll have to convince me that GB is actually scummy. I'm just not seeing it right now. Right now, I think misder is the best lynch target. He was blue fishing, hasn't posted scumreads, and has been pretty AFK for the last day or so. If he wants to get ignored (a scummy thing), he's doing pretty well. Why wouldn't you lynch misder? just lurking and blue fishing doesn't do it for me. blue fishing is bad but i don't see scum doing it often enough to think it's a scum thing. you've haven't told me about his mindset, just that he hasn't posted much. if you want to convince me that a policy lurker lynch is better than RNG lycnh, which has worked 50% of the time I've actually gotten people to vote the guy, you'ave got another thing coming
Sample size = 2?
|
Also some serious correlation = causation fallacies
|
Also misder's "lets consolidate out analyse votes" -> analyse cincumstance out of the blue is pretty weird too.
And BH needs to take a stats course.
|
And anyone who hasn't analysed should do it on jay, as he has the most votes, and I'm pretty sure the cat's just waiting for us to get a majority.
|
On November 02 2014 09:39 ritoky wrote:Show nested quote +On November 02 2014 09:12 jrkirby wrote:
Also misder's "lets consolidate out analyse votes" -> analyse cincumstance out of the blue is pretty weird too.
And BH needs to take a stats course. like....what is your case on misder? i tried to look thru your filter and didn't find anything really organized. and this sentiment is literally a direct sheep of something i said earlier.
Blue fishing + No scum hunting + Lurking + that = decent chance of scum.
|
On November 02 2014 09:48 Holyflare wrote:Show nested quote +On November 02 2014 09:47 jrkirby wrote:On November 02 2014 09:39 ritoky wrote:On November 02 2014 09:12 jrkirby wrote:
Also misder's "lets consolidate out analyse votes" -> analyse cincumstance out of the blue is pretty weird too.
And BH needs to take a stats course. like....what is your case on misder? i tried to look thru your filter and didn't find anything really organized. and this sentiment is literally a direct sheep of something i said earlier. Blue fishing + No scum hunting + Lurking + that = decent chance of scum. Were you not happy with his answers? I thought they were quite towny
On October 31 2014 14:38 Misder wrote:
For the "role-fishing" thing - don't know if what I said actually counts as role-fishing, but if we ever do find out his character, I'm inclined to believe that jkirby is not the opposite alignment of that character (subjective of course). I would have thought that either way, but I asked because I wanted to get the point across.
I read it as "Role fishing? I wasn't role-fishing, I was just kinda... asking him what his role was. Also, lets talk more about what his role might be."
Also, with his last post, he calls for a risk.nuke lynch, but doesn't even vote him.
Are you all going to let him sit back in the scum QT laughing at us?
|
LT, if day 1 ended on time, misder would have ended it with his vote on you (as it would be over in the next 10 minutes).
How do you feel about that? I think that's too much lurking.
|
Ok, I'm reading up, page 62 atm, but I need to post right now: Why the fuck would you lynch lurker's who haven't voted? Voting is mandatory! If they don't vote, they get replaced. Lynch a lurker who HAS voted. Circumstance and risk.nuke haven't voted. MISDER has!
|
Edit, and I just saw risk nuke. I hate the timing he arrived with.
|
And I just saw misder too. Guess it was unwise to skip two pages 
|
I'm pretty sure VE's double lynch post was wishful thinking. Risk.nuke's response to it was wicked scummy. The timing of him arriving, and what he said.
risk.nuke: who are you going to vote this day?
|
So risk, if you don't know how you're helping town, why aren't you scum?
|
You've posted pretty much 0 scumreads, and don't know who you're voting. On top of that you were afk for pretty much forever. Why shouldn't we lynch you?
|
VISCERAL EYES: Was the double lynch a real thing, or was it just wishful thinking?
While I hope it's real, as it'll be super hard to get a lynch today without it, Something tells me it's not a real thing.
|
|
|
|
|
|
379
287
125
153
EPT
