i mean yes you did "analyse" gb's post but it didn't really say anything about anyone at all other than "yeh gb's post is probably wrong it's too early" and the rest of the game is cat fluff

Holyflare

United Kingdom30774 Posts

October 31 2014 13:47 GMT

#426

On October 31 2014 15:08 Seuss wrote:
He basically jumped hard on the first person to post anything remotely suspicious. The post in question wasn't fantastic but it seemed really opportunistic to me.

so you admit that it's at least remotely suspicious and that he drove the discussion forward on this point, why is it scummy then?

Holyflare

United Kingdom30774 Posts

October 31 2014 13:54 GMT

#428

i dunno ve has pretty basic reads but i actually agree with them and they aren't super obvious reads so that's a plus for now

Holyflare

United Kingdom30774 Posts

October 31 2014 13:57 GMT

#429

also i don't like how you just threw away circumstances case on you, it was pretty good and it's certainly not about you being aggressive it's that you don't particularly have your own insights onto alignments and are just saying things

Holyflare

United Kingdom30774 Posts

October 31 2014 14:03 GMT

#431

##vote lord tolkien

just gonna do this till he stops trolling

Holyflare

United Kingdom30774 Posts

October 31 2014 14:07 GMT

#433

i had the same feeling as ve that misder looks like he's trying to figure things out even if it is kind of broken into parts

Holyflare

United Kingdom30774 Posts

October 31 2014 14:15 GMT

#435

he answered all of them are you even reading the thread??

Holyflare

United Kingdom30774 Posts

October 31 2014 14:17 GMT

#436

it was his answers that obviously gave me the not scummy lean because they actually showed a thought process behind whatever he was saying even if it is a little bit misguided at times

Holyflare

United Kingdom30774 Posts

October 31 2014 14:18 GMT

#438

well then that's too fucking bad i'll sheep ve on his super pro read then

Holyflare

United Kingdom30774 Posts

October 31 2014 14:19 GMT

#440

we are most probably going to analyse slam so use a vote on who you actually think is scummy instead please

Holyflare

United Kingdom30774 Posts

October 31 2014 14:30 GMT

#443

On October 31 2014 23:23 GlowingBear wrote:

Show nested quote +

##Vote:Holyflare

Here we go again?

Do you have any idea what analyse does? Because I don't.

you're actually retarded or what? slam is incredibly unreadable and he's lurking and that makes him 100% a coin flip on his alignment so an analyse is perfect because it literally doesn't matter if it's bad or good and seeing as we get to use 2 in a cycle then that info is nothing but beneficial

Holyflare

United Kingdom30774 Posts

October 31 2014 14:35 GMT

#445

may as well claim now

+ Show Spoiler +

I'm a 1 cost doge with much wow and I can win this game if you just follow my op reads

Holyflare

United Kingdom30774 Posts

October 31 2014 14:42 GMT

#447

gz on 2k damd

Holyflare

United Kingdom30774 Posts

October 31 2014 14:52 GMT

#450

1) ObiWanShinobi <--- random town reads based off of almost nothing and talking about useless crap
2) Lord Tolkien - useless spam all game, making things up about me to justify vote (still dont even know if it was a joke)
5) risk.nuke - 0 posts
7) Seuss
10) Oatsmaster - aggression but no real commitment and looks really behind when he returns to question things already answered, dunno might take him off
11) Alakaslam - 0 posts
12) Blazinghand - 0 posts (wouldn't be surprised if he was somehow the cat)
13) Damdred - don't really know what he's thinking at all
14) liancourt - potentially could take off he looks jokey enough and has some of his trademark basic reads but meh
17) jaybrundage - cat policy, 3 policy, ?????? policy king

op list post, please contribute to shrinking it

Holyflare

United Kingdom30774 Posts

October 31 2014 15:15 GMT

#454

Oh how useless

Holyflare

United Kingdom30774 Posts

October 31 2014 16:02 GMT

#462

So then it's towny that gb realises it and drops it from suspicion so why you still attacking him?

Holyflare

United Kingdom30774 Posts

October 31 2014 19:44 GMT

#490

Jay your posts are all policy and i don't need to include you arguing with gb because you were again arguing over policy so there's that, then you also make a giant case thing on me which apparently has no relevance because you're voting for the person I've called mafia...? So not only does that entire post say nothing but you don't even follow through with the nothing on me.

Holyflare

United Kingdom30774 Posts

October 31 2014 19:46 GMT

#491

I didn't even see risk posted when was that

Holyflare

United Kingdom30774 Posts

October 31 2014 20:48 GMT

#502

Going out soon so would like to consolidate analyse votes on someone, jay pretty scummy and might end up with my vote so kind of a waste of analysis imo

Holyflare

United Kingdom30774 Posts

October 31 2014 20:57 GMT

#504

Such a next level read gb, why is that?