EPTIf so, /in
Newbie Mini Mafia LVII
| Forum Index > TL Mafia |
|
DCLXVI
United States720 Posts
If so, /in | ||
|
DCLXVI
United States720 Posts
| ||
|
DCLXVI
United States720 Posts
looking suspicious there glowingbear better step up your game. | ||
|
DCLXVI
United States720 Posts
We actually did get some information from jennyhell from your question. We can expect her to be attentive and on the ball, if she starts lurking we should look into it. | ||
|
DCLXVI
United States720 Posts
| ||
|
DCLXVI
United States720 Posts
On July 30 2014 05:32 lilwade wrote: Testing peoples actions and reactions, tehpoofter is the most town person in the game right now. Are you sure about that? He says he will come up with a list of his ideas on people, then posts mostly spam afterwards. Maybe he wasn't joking about mafia on mafia action? If time is the concern how about posting just the top 1 mafia/town tehpoofter? For me Glowingbear is easily the top town, between getting the town started working and keeping it on track. I would be interested to hear your opinions on people GB. Top Scum for me right now is tehpoofter, he spent the first half of his posts doing nothing, then says he will get to work and immediately returns to spam. ##Vote Tehpoofter | ||
|
DCLXVI
United States720 Posts
##Unvote I have not felt any scummy vibes from teemursu, but apparently some people have so I will go take a look at that. | ||
|
DCLXVI
United States720 Posts
He starts off the day spammy, stopping once GlowingBear starts the real game. Perhaps he wanted to delay that as long as possible? Just a guess. However, later on he posts this after a long conversation with GlowingBear: On July 30 2014 04:50 Teemursu wrote: Nothing, really. It's just scum-indicative to ask questions and not follow them up with anything. I was seeing if you were trying to figure out the game thus far and, I'm okay with this post. The next two people he talks to he asks short one line questions that he doesn't really follow up on. He does ask another question to seeyalater as a 'followup' but it is really just another question that he responds 'ok, thanks for your answer'. He then goes to bed, and jumps in with a couple more questions. Let us know what you really think of the players Teemursu. You haven't taken a stance on anyone or anything so far. If you are going to tell us It's just scum-indicative to ask questions and not follow them up with anything and then do just that, I will vote for you. Everyone should take a long look at his filter and tell me if I am wrong, but this is pretty damning. ##Vote Teemursu | ||
|
DCLXVI
United States720 Posts
Oh man I know I just went off on Teemursu on this if you don't follow up on this or post your opinions too I will not be happy. | ||
|
DCLXVI
United States720 Posts
On July 30 2014 12:25 Tehpoofter wrote: Not sure how he would classify what I have done is spam. I have conversations. Can you point out which of my posts made you change. I said I wouldn't bang him anymore cause his reasoning wasn't just a miscommunication he actually thought I was being spammy which I disagree with. I feel like there are a lot of people who could be called scum and saying it was me then was only good if he misread something. Either hes not paying attention or he is not reading at all. Either way its scummy... so no longer bangable. Your conversations were meaningless jokes and you threw a few votes around for no reason, that to me is spam. Once you finally started contributing after your small and then clarified largerer reads on everyone I saw the spam was mixed in with real posts. After that you picked it up with some decent lines of questioning that lead to information about others, and I now know your opinions on people. This is what I classify as spam, do you disagree? + Show Spoiler + On July 30 2014 03:56 Tehpoofter wrote: Yeah no way your face is annoying but you claimed it is. Why would you lie? On July 30 2014 04:00 Tehpoofter wrote: Saying I'm not funny? ##unvote ##Vote lilwade On July 30 2014 08:29 Tehpoofter wrote: I wasn't suppose to share that with everyone i knew? I understand that you are responding to people in these, but that does not help me figure out who is what, it just makes you look active and your filter harder to read. You posted that you would actually say stuff about people, then went straight back to what you were doing before, that is why I voted for you. | ||
|
DCLXVI
United States720 Posts
| ||
|
DCLXVI
United States720 Posts
On July 30 2014 14:25 Teemursu wrote: 666, why are you still voting me, instead of poofter? Because he actually started having firm opinions on things, as opposed to your attitude of "I think Seeyalater is scum(but I am not voting him.) | ||
|
DCLXVI
United States720 Posts
You seem to want people to use their votes On July 30 2014 17:29 Teemursu wrote: People who aren't yet voting anyone: Jenny, lilwade, meatpudding, Seeyalater. Could you please do vote someone? On July 31 2014 04:09 Teemursu wrote: Seeyalater, you said you'd re evaluate everyone, but I don't see you've reevaluated me at all, when I'm the person you should probably be reevaluating the most. I'm obviously town and not going to get lynched today, if not for the longetlst filter alone, so you eed to do some effective scumhunting and place your vote somewhere where it's not useless.  but you do not actually use yours to try to kill mafia? On July 30 2014 15:54 Teemursu wrote: Also, Seeyalater, I didn't imply anywhere that they were good reads. What I meant to say (kinda typo'd earlier) that town doesn't have good reads early, which means that posting an early list like that is easy as mafia to appear as townie. It is easy because the reads are either a) sheeped and the list is mostly a recap of what's been said earlier or b) fabricated. A is the case and which is why I think you're scummy. ##Unvote Not scummy enough to warrant a vote at this point, actually, and I think I might not be on the right track. I think you might actually think that I'm mafia now, maybe. ##Vote Tehpoofter Until he praises how town I am or discusses reads with me. I see hours after that you post your suspicions on tehpoofter, but why did you throw down your vote without backing it up? It would have been easy for you to retract that vote if people pushed you on it, saying that it wasn't a real vote, but no one was around to question why you placed your vote without reason. You waffle a bit on seeyalater, switching between thinking he is mafia and thinking he is town but suspects you, and back again. However you don't actually try to get him lynched, you play both sides to the coin posting your opinions but not really following through. Add in the fact that several times when people pushed on you you deflected it without really answering On July 30 2014 12:41 Teemursu wrote: I literally just woke up. Actually, I lied, I tried to get Naxx working first. So far, I haven't read most of the thread with thought. I haven't really given any reads (which is the reason most people are going against me? Idk) because it was still very early in the game, and people started being more active when I was focusing on trying to getting into bed/focusing on getting legend in Hearthstone. Anyways, I like the spot I'm in, I generally get very good reads when people are pushing on me. My initial gutfeelz are that Seeyalater is mafia. Reading his filter kind of confirms this to me, so you should probably do it yourself too, but it feels to me like he is trying to kind of blend in town by "agreeing a lot with everyone else says" (first page) and then posted a liszt of reads in which I didn't feel the reasoning for the reads was too strong. Jenny is pretty towny, lotsa content and probably is going to have the second longest filter (after me). I kinda wish lilwade would've followed up with his "reaction tests". Not posting too many reads while creating the opportunity for himself makes me lean scum on him. 666's case was okay, but it kinda gave a feeling that he was trying too hard to justify his vote? Idk. I would kind of like to see the questions he wanted me to follow up with since I'm too lazy myself. too lazy to read my argument? On July 31 2014 04:09 Teemursu wrote: Seeyalater, you said you'd re evaluate everyone, but I don't see you've reevaluated me at all, when I'm the person you should probably be reevaluating the most. I'm obviously town and not going to get lynched today, if not for the longetlst filter alone, so you eed to do some effective scumhunting and place your vote somewhere where it's not useless. You don't really make me trust you with any of this. | ||
|
DCLXVI
United States720 Posts
On July 31 2014 07:26 GlowingBear wrote: Why aren't you voting meatpudding? Why aren't people voting meatpudding? Mainly because I think teemursu is more likely to be mafia. Meatpuddings posts have been sparce and subpar, but that could be attributed to an uninterested vanilla as well as a lurking mafia. Teemursu I have a strong feeling of scum. That being said, Teemursu is at least talking and giving some information whereas Meatpudding is completely useless to the town, I can see why people would rather see him go. | ||
|
DCLXVI
United States720 Posts
On July 31 2014 14:00 meatpudding wrote: This quote from cya sums up how I feel on 666 so far. All this tells me is that cya is not scum if 666 is, because he would be too carful and not "accidentally" forget him. Goodnight, hope I'm still alive in the morning. | ||
|
DCLXVI
United States720 Posts
##Vote MeatPudding | ||
| ||
