|
On July 31 2014 15:00 JennyHell wrote:Show nested quote +On July 31 2014 14:56 meatpudding wrote:On July 31 2014 14:50 JennyHell wrote:On July 31 2014 14:43 meatpudding wrote:On July 31 2014 14:25 GlowingBear wrote:On July 31 2014 14:22 meatpudding wrote:On July 31 2014 14:13 GlowingBear wrote:On July 31 2014 14:00 meatpudding wrote:On July 31 2014 13:50 GlowingBear wrote:On July 31 2014 13:46 meatpudding wrote:
[quote]
Sorry my posts are so short. I have only limited time each day but I'm catching up with the thread. Hey I'm not the only lurker *ahem*
Town plays to find who is mafia and what are they doing. Scum play is to lead to mislynches until you win. What Tea is doing is to try to talk people into committing too hard or contradicting themselves. Town always contradict and make mistakes on d1. His posts are not clearly scummy nor are they clearly town, leading me to believe he is scum waiting for the right wagon.
On the great GB. I think he is another type of scum. What he is doing is to try to be objective and logical while building up a case. I think he's trying too hard, and exaggerating a bit much for me to find it believable. This is scum trying to mislead town.
666 and cya I will need to filter dive some more. Right now I would still prefer to leave my vote on tea if it were an option. I'd like you to specifically filter dive 666 and bring your read on him. On July 30 2014 10:33 Seeyalater wrote:
Oh my bad completely skipped over him. I'll be 100% honest, he's completely fallen off my radar since he talked earlier.
Actually had to go look at his previous posts in this thread, and have realized how little he's done in the game. His first read on GB seemed townie aligned, but him dropping off afterwards and the weird comment he made at teemu have made me put him on the leaning mafia side, though not someone I'd want to push on today. This quote from cya sums up how I feel on 666 so far. All this tells me is that cya is not scum if 666 is, because he would be too carful and not "accidentally" forget him. I ask you to filter dive 666, you bring cya's post. You said you have to filter dive him. Suddenly you see his vote in Teemu and thinks that just because that he is town. Why bringing up cya's? I understand he shares the view but I asked your opinion, you're just reproducing someone's, which is easy. More than that, you bring another unrelated person to the conversation when we are talking about you. I did say I needed to read both cya's and 666's filter. I brought up that post because I had a null read up until I read 666's more logical posts. Generally there is a towny way to make a case which is what I find in his logic. Ok, fair logic, but unconvincing. 666 brought his case on Teemu and nobody bought it. If you really need Teemu is a better vote than 666, you gotta work that out more. It's not that nobody bought it cya did - http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/viewpost.php?post_id=22704228Jen did - http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/viewpost.php?post_id=22706931Banks did (early) - http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/viewpost.php?post_id=22702263and again (later) - http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/viewpost.php?post_id=22703459lilwade fence - http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/viewpost.php?post_id=22703540The trend in Teemu's posts is that they are misleading and deliberately hard to get a read from. It's risky to exclude one player from lynch, especially in a small game. Anyone propose a second target, because I still say Teemu is the safest lynch today. Whoa whoa whoa.. Are you putting words in our mouths? How is me prompting Teemu that we need to be able to read him, and that I have a difficult time doing so mean that I bought DC's case against him? Yeah that was poorly worded by me. I mean that he wasn't the only one to bring up suspicion here. Although I would like you to share your thoughts on Teemu. I don't think he's town. I've said quite a bit about Teemu, and it should still be in my filter. I'd much rather have a bunch of reads from you about people that rehash what I've said for the ~30 hours you haven't been here.
So far I still read you and Banks as town. 666 and cya both read town to me too. I am suspicious of Teemu and GB. Tolk and lilwade are fence.
You and banks have been consistent and i won't change my early reads here. Teemu seems scummy to me through his inert line of questioning and reluctance to push on mafia. GB seems scummy for his too carefully crafted analysis and I think he wants a mislynch. 666 and cya both presents logical cases that I can agree with.
If someone has a case on DC or Teemu I'd like to hear it.
|
On July 31 2014 15:01 Teemursu wrote:Show nested quote +On July 31 2014 15:00 meatpudding wrote:On July 31 2014 14:58 Teemursu wrote:On July 31 2014 14:56 meatpudding wrote:On July 31 2014 14:50 JennyHell wrote:On July 31 2014 14:43 meatpudding wrote:On July 31 2014 14:25 GlowingBear wrote:On July 31 2014 14:22 meatpudding wrote:On July 31 2014 14:13 GlowingBear wrote:On July 31 2014 14:00 meatpudding wrote:
[quote]
[quote]
This quote from cya sums up how I feel on 666 so far. All this tells me is that cya is not scum if 666 is, because he would be too carful and not "accidentally" forget him.
I ask you to filter dive 666, you bring cya's post. You said you have to filter dive him. Suddenly you see his vote in Teemu and thinks that just because that he is town. Why bringing up cya's? I understand he shares the view but I asked your opinion, you're just reproducing someone's, which is easy. More than that, you bring another unrelated person to the conversation when we are talking about you. I did say I needed to read both cya's and 666's filter. I brought up that post because I had a null read up until I read 666's more logical posts. Generally there is a towny way to make a case which is what I find in his logic. Ok, fair logic, but unconvincing. 666 brought his case on Teemu and nobody bought it. If you really need Teemu is a better vote than 666, you gotta work that out more. It's not that nobody bought it cya did - http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/viewpost.php?post_id=22704228Jen did - http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/viewpost.php?post_id=22706931Banks did (early) - http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/viewpost.php?post_id=22702263and again (later) - http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/viewpost.php?post_id=22703459lilwade fence - http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/viewpost.php?post_id=22703540The trend in Teemu's posts is that they are misleading and deliberately hard to get a read from. It's risky to exclude one player from lynch, especially in a small game. Anyone propose a second target, because I still say Teemu is the safest lynch today. Whoa whoa whoa.. Are you putting words in our mouths? How is me prompting Teemu that we need to be able to read him, and that I have a difficult time doing so mean that I bought DC's case against him? Yeah that was poorly worded by me. I mean that he wasn't the only one to bring up suspicion here. Although I would like you to share your thoughts on Teemu. I don't think he's town. You don't need to focus on me, I'm not a lynch today like everyone else already has told you. If you're town focus on someone who you can help getting lynched, so we can get mafia day 1. Ok? Great. Calm down we are doing it  Who is your top lynch? You or 666.
Why me or 666?
|
Anyone can chime in here. How did 666 become most scummy? Are we going for a policy lynch on d1? (one-page filter)... What little he posts seems like town to me. Does anybody have a case besides "he rings scummy"?
|
On July 31 2014 15:21 Teemursu wrote:Show nested quote +On July 31 2014 15:07 meatpudding wrote:On July 31 2014 15:01 Teemursu wrote:On July 31 2014 15:00 meatpudding wrote:On July 31 2014 14:58 Teemursu wrote:On July 31 2014 14:56 meatpudding wrote:On July 31 2014 14:50 JennyHell wrote:Whoa whoa whoa.. Are you putting words in our mouths? How is me prompting Teemu that we need to be able to read him, and that I have a difficult time doing so mean that I bought DC's case against him? Yeah that was poorly worded by me. I mean that he wasn't the only one to bring up suspicion here. Although I would like you to share your thoughts on Teemu. I don't think he's town. You don't need to focus on me, I'm not a lynch today like everyone else already has told you. If you're town focus on someone who you can help getting lynched, so we can get mafia day 1. Ok? Great. Calm down we are doing it Who is your top lynch? You or 666. Why me or 666? You've lurked throughout the whole game until now. When you were posting a bit, you asked a couple of questions and disappeared again without following any of that stuff. Your liszt post was pretty terrible. None of these things make you necessarily mafia, but scummy and impossible to read, especially after you can't give me any viable name to lynch. Show nested quote +On July 31 2014 14:54 Teemursu wrote:On July 31 2014 14:43 meatpudding wrote:On July 31 2014 14:25 GlowingBear wrote:On July 31 2014 14:22 meatpudding wrote:On July 31 2014 14:13 GlowingBear wrote:On July 31 2014 14:00 meatpudding wrote:On July 31 2014 13:50 GlowingBear wrote:On July 31 2014 13:46 meatpudding wrote:On July 31 2014 13:41 GlowingBear wrote:
[quote]
You do understand that that list you've brought sounds scummy ad that you lurking all the way also sounds scummy, right? You gotta make us believe that there are better options and saying just that isn't helping you Sorry my posts are so short. I have only limited time each day but I'm catching up with the thread. Hey I'm not the only lurker *ahem* Town plays to find who is mafia and what are they doing. Scum play is to lead to mislynches until you win. What Tea is doing is to try to talk people into committing too hard or contradicting themselves. Town always contradict and make mistakes on d1. His posts are not clearly scummy nor are they clearly town, leading me to believe he is scum waiting for the right wagon. On the great GB. I think he is another type of scum. What he is doing is to try to be objective and logical while building up a case. I think he's trying too hard, and exaggerating a bit much for me to find it believable. This is scum trying to mislead town. 666 and cya I will need to filter dive some more. Right now I would still prefer to leave my vote on tea if it were an option. I'd like you to specifically filter dive 666 and bring your read on him. On July 30 2014 10:33 Seeyalater wrote:
Oh my bad completely skipped over him. I'll be 100% honest, he's completely fallen off my radar since he talked earlier.
Actually had to go look at his previous posts in this thread, and have realized how little he's done in the game. His first read on GB seemed townie aligned, but him dropping off afterwards and the weird comment he made at teemu have made me put him on the leaning mafia side, though not someone I'd want to push on today. This quote from cya sums up how I feel on 666 so far. All this tells me is that cya is not scum if 666 is, because he would be too carful and not "accidentally" forget him. I ask you to filter dive 666, you bring cya's post. You said you have to filter dive him. Suddenly you see his vote in Teemu and thinks that just because that he is town. Why bringing up cya's? I understand he shares the view but I asked your opinion, you're just reproducing someone's, which is easy. More than that, you bring another unrelated person to the conversation when we are talking about you. I did say I needed to read both cya's and 666's filter. I brought up that post because I had a null read up until I read 666's more logical posts. Generally there is a towny way to make a case which is what I find in his logic. Ok, fair logic, but unconvincing. 666 brought his case on Teemu and nobody bought it. If you really need Teemu is a better vote than 666, you gotta work that out more. It's not that nobody bought it cya did - http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/viewpost.php?post_id=22704228Jen did - http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/viewpost.php?post_id=22706931Banks did (early) - http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/viewpost.php?post_id=22702263and again (later) - http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/viewpost.php?post_id=22703459lilwade fence - http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/viewpost.php?post_id=22703540The trend in Teemu's posts is that they are misleading and deliberately hard to get a read from. It's risky to exclude one player from lynch, especially in a small game. Anyone propose a second target, because I still say Teemu is the safest lynch today. Most of these aren't a reference to any case made by 666. It's like you've just went ahead and find a post by everyone that pushes/questions me the most. There was a decent reason to suspect me early on, when I hadn't done anything, but after I started putting out reads and content, a few people called me town (Banks switched from kill to bang, GB and Tolkien). You keep saying that my posts are misleading and hard to read, but I've clearly taken a stance on people. You also don't provide any evidence, you just kind of repeat the same old and sheep other pushes on me. If I was mafia (and this may sound a little weird to you), why wouldn't I stay with my push on say Seeyalater, like I did in the previous newbie game with you , and just get an easy miss lynch? 666 because I'm sheeping Banks. Your case on GB is so bad as well, none of the things you said about him make mafia, if anything, more town.
This is scummy logic. You know I'm not the only lurker and now I'm posting more. And you have probably the most posts yet you sheep Banks because you can't give a viable name to lynch. So you should have some idea by now? You are pretty quick to throw out town reads though.
|
On July 31 2014 15:27 Teemursu wrote:Show nested quote +On July 31 2014 15:20 meatpudding wrote:
Anyone can chime in here. How did 666 become most scummy? Are we going for a policy lynch on d1? (one-page filter)... What little he posts seems like town to me. Does anybody have a case besides "he rings scummy"? Can you stop asking questions and give more substantiated reads? Asking these questions is not going to help you to not get lynched. You're wrong on me today, accept it for at least today, you can re-evaluate me later.
That wasn't directed to you or anyone specific, but to have a consolidated wagon I would like it to be someone where there is a case against them. I don't actually think 666 is worth lynching so far.
|
On July 31 2014 15:32 Tehpoofter wrote:
There has to be a large shift in ideas meat for you or romannumeral not to get lynched. Why on earth don't you go ahead and say something thats going to make a shift like that happen.
Your thing about teemu is bad. The post you linked on who thought he was scummy was all BEFORE romannumeral's case.... like i dont even know what you were trying to say with that.
It's not about the timing, but people seemed to be having the same conclusion to the posting style that was used. In fact roman basically wagons as he references the existing suspicion. My point is that what he said echoes what some people were thinking (right?). I mean Jenny said I was putting words in her mouth but I thought that they had the same idea there. At least I agree with it and between tea and roman i wouldn't pick roman.
|
On July 31 2014 15:53 Tehpoofter wrote:
Meat you need to make a concise point why you and roman numeral aren't mafia. You or him are both on the block and could die.
You have to do loads of work to have this not happen. So tell us why it shouldnt' happen.
Why don't you elaborate why you think he's scum? http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/viewpost.php?post_id=22709181 You say he's not pushing when in fact he is. Like yeah he hasn't posted much but I do not get scum from that. I happen to think he is going in the right direction (except voting me) and I think he's town. Would you reevaluate roman when you were once "75% sure" tea was scum?
|
On July 31 2014 16:19 Tehpoofter wrote:Show nested quote +On July 31 2014 16:13 meatpudding wrote:On July 31 2014 15:53 Tehpoofter wrote:
Meat you need to make a concise point why you and roman numeral aren't mafia. You or him are both on the block and could die.
You have to do loads of work to have this not happen. So tell us why it shouldnt' happen. Why don't you elaborate why you think he's scum? http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/viewpost.php?post_id=22709181 You say he's not pushing when in fact he is. Like yeah he hasn't posted much but I do not get scum from that. I happen to think he is going in the right direction (except voting me) and I think he's town. Would you reevaluate roman when you were once "75% sure" tea was scum? I made the 75% number up. I just know he hadnt been playing it was for reactions I never thought he was that mafia tbh. I didn't even get votes on him. But see the thing is that RomanNumeralGuy isn't even trying to get who he thinks is scum lynched (teemu) hes not trying to convince others hes mafia hes not asking for votes. Hes happy with how things go. He just went to sleep thinking you would die. He doesn't care to push any further. HE is being apathetic about scum hunting=mafia.
This still isn't enough to swing my vote. I think apathetic scum hunting could be applied more than one way. At least he put minimal effort in. Maybe I agree with you but do you put top scum based on that alone?
|
On July 31 2014 14:47 GlowingBear wrote:Went through cya's filter and I find his posts not so bad, although with lots of fluff. I'd say I'm on the fence regarding him. And for the case I've brought, I believe the reasoning I've brought was okay. It was okay to think they could be mafia by the posts I've quoted. I thought it was a good idea to push them so we could gather more information. But formatting it like a case may have been a bad idea. It was still the best push I saw at that moment. Teemu, I was going to filter dive you but you have 6 pages and it's almost 3am here. I have a really important exam tomorrow. I'll do it later. Don't be mad
I think you are not treating your push on me as seriously as you did here. I think that you are too busy trying to attack me and not trying to read me. You asked me a lot when I came back, what did you learn from that? You're willing to move off cya too easily I think. What are your thoughts on Jenny now? Who are your new scum reads?
|
On July 31 2014 16:30 Teemursu wrote:Show nested quote +On July 31 2014 16:23 meatpudding wrote:On July 31 2014 16:19 Tehpoofter wrote:On July 31 2014 16:13 meatpudding wrote:On July 31 2014 15:53 Tehpoofter wrote:
Meat you need to make a concise point why you and roman numeral aren't mafia. You or him are both on the block and could die.
You have to do loads of work to have this not happen. So tell us why it shouldnt' happen. Why don't you elaborate why you think he's scum? http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/viewpost.php?post_id=22709181 You say he's not pushing when in fact he is. Like yeah he hasn't posted much but I do not get scum from that. I happen to think he is going in the right direction (except voting me) and I think he's town. Would you reevaluate roman when you were once "75% sure" tea was scum? I made the 75% number up. I just know he hadnt been playing it was for reactions I never thought he was that mafia tbh. I didn't even get votes on him. But see the thing is that RomanNumeralGuy isn't even trying to get who he thinks is scum lynched (teemu) hes not trying to convince others hes mafia hes not asking for votes. Hes happy with how things go. He just went to sleep thinking you would die. He doesn't care to push any further. HE is being apathetic about scum hunting=mafia. This still isn't enough to swing my vote. I think apathetic scum hunting could be applied more than one way. At least he put minimal effort in. Maybe I agree with you but do you put top scum based on that alone? Ok, you agree that 666 doesn't really care if I get lynched or not. Assume you're wrong on me, why is 666 town now? If you really really really think I'm mafia and still want to tunnel on me, I want YOU to make a case and not a) repeat that everyone apparently thinks I'm scum/on the fence with me and b) say that you're sheeping 666 and that he's right.
My scum read on you comes from your posting style. Your text:content ratio is ay off. It looks like your trying to misdirect town. A mislynch or wagon is what your looking for. You haven't made any serious claim on mafia. Your lines of questioning resolve without any new insight. I think that you are not playing at all townie.
|
On July 31 2014 16:37 Tehpoofter wrote:Show nested quote +On July 31 2014 16:23 meatpudding wrote:On July 31 2014 16:19 Tehpoofter wrote:On July 31 2014 16:13 meatpudding wrote:On July 31 2014 15:53 Tehpoofter wrote:
Meat you need to make a concise point why you and roman numeral aren't mafia. You or him are both on the block and could die.
You have to do loads of work to have this not happen. So tell us why it shouldnt' happen. Why don't you elaborate why you think he's scum? http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/viewpost.php?post_id=22709181 You say he's not pushing when in fact he is. Like yeah he hasn't posted much but I do not get scum from that. I happen to think he is going in the right direction (except voting me) and I think he's town. Would you reevaluate roman when you were once "75% sure" tea was scum? I made the 75% number up. I just know he hadnt been playing it was for reactions I never thought he was that mafia tbh. I didn't even get votes on him. But see the thing is that RomanNumeralGuy isn't even trying to get who he thinks is scum lynched (teemu) hes not trying to convince others hes mafia hes not asking for votes. Hes happy with how things go. He just went to sleep thinking you would die. He doesn't care to push any further. HE is being apathetic about scum hunting=mafia. This still isn't enough to swing my vote. I think apathetic scum hunting could be applied more than one way. At least he put minimal effort in. Maybe I agree with you but do you put top scum based on that alone? So you think you're more mafia than him..... Look at votes bro. Btw I forgot to say this earlier but I'm town. I wasn't in my reads and I Wanted people who need someone to trust to know thats the case.
I'm really starting to lose faith in you bro. We are going to wagon on 666 when you have so little to claim on him? And Teemu is just sheeping you. This reasoning does not stand with me, and if you can't name another scum I would consider switching my vote from tea to you. Make more sense before leading a potential mislynch.
|
On July 31 2014 16:54 Tehpoofter wrote:Show nested quote +On July 31 2014 16:44 meatpudding wrote:On July 31 2014 16:37 Tehpoofter wrote:On July 31 2014 16:23 meatpudding wrote:On July 31 2014 16:19 Tehpoofter wrote:On July 31 2014 16:13 meatpudding wrote:On July 31 2014 15:53 Tehpoofter wrote:
Meat you need to make a concise point why you and roman numeral aren't mafia. You or him are both on the block and could die.
You have to do loads of work to have this not happen. So tell us why it shouldnt' happen. Why don't you elaborate why you think he's scum? http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/viewpost.php?post_id=22709181 You say he's not pushing when in fact he is. Like yeah he hasn't posted much but I do not get scum from that. I happen to think he is going in the right direction (except voting me) and I think he's town. Would you reevaluate roman when you were once "75% sure" tea was scum? I made the 75% number up. I just know he hadnt been playing it was for reactions I never thought he was that mafia tbh. I didn't even get votes on him. But see the thing is that RomanNumeralGuy isn't even trying to get who he thinks is scum lynched (teemu) hes not trying to convince others hes mafia hes not asking for votes. Hes happy with how things go. He just went to sleep thinking you would die. He doesn't care to push any further. HE is being apathetic about scum hunting=mafia. This still isn't enough to swing my vote. I think apathetic scum hunting could be applied more than one way. At least he put minimal effort in. Maybe I agree with you but do you put top scum based on that alone? So you think you're more mafia than him..... Look at votes bro. Btw I forgot to say this earlier but I'm town. I wasn't in my reads and I Wanted people who need someone to trust to know thats the case. I'm really starting to lose faith in you bro. We are going to wagon on 666 when you have so little to claim on him? And Teemu is just sheeping you. This reasoning does not stand with me, and if you can't name another scum I would consider switching my vote from tea to you. Make more sense before leading a potential mislynch. So you think that I'm mafia for consolidating votes onto two people who have equal opportunity to defend themselves?
How sure are you that there is a mafia there? I think based on your short case on roman that you are not very sure. Wouldn't mafia at least pretend to care? I don't see how you are reading town on tea because he has posted a lot more and I see the same scummy vibe in each post.
|
On July 31 2014 17:09 Teemursu wrote:
W/e, it doesn't really matter. She's town otherwise in her posting and that post isn't going to make her mafia in any world.
Who do you think is scum then? You can't really be voting me cause I'm inactive and roman to sheep Banks...
|
I hope Jenny catches up, I would like to hear her opinion.
|
On July 31 2014 17:36 JennyHell wrote:Show nested quote +On July 31 2014 17:29 Tehpoofter wrote:On July 31 2014 17:27 JennyHell wrote:On July 31 2014 17:21 meatpudding wrote:
I hope Jenny catches up, I would like to hear her opinion. I am currently reading, and keeping up. Still waiting for something valid from you. I'd like perhaps a longer post with more thought through and explained reads. If there's someone you really think we should reconsider, making a case might help? do your bang marry kill? Where am I at, eh? For today, my bangs are as follow: GB Seeya Tolkien Teemu My marry is: Poofter/Banks/Hubby/Rhianna/Robin (He's got many wonderful nicknames) My kills are: DC Meatpuppy/pudding whatever the name was lilwade I was asked to re-think lilwade and I've started to doubt my scumread on him due to people convincing me to. He's my least scummiest out of the kills. Do I need to re-tell all my reasons or is the names enough?
The meaning of this depends on if you prefer B or M?
|
On July 31 2014 17:43 Teemursu wrote:Show nested quote +On July 31 2014 17:11 meatpudding wrote:On July 31 2014 17:09 Teemursu wrote:
W/e, it doesn't really matter. She's town otherwise in her posting and that post isn't going to make her mafia in any world. Who do you think is scum then? You can't really be voting me cause I'm inactive and roman to sheep Banks... If you and 666 are both town, I honestly don't know. I'm not voting on you because you're inactive, I'm voting on you because: Show nested quote +On July 31 2014 15:45 Teemursu wrote:
Meat, I think it's pretty scummy that you're not as strong with your opinion as you are with repeating that everyone else thinks what you're trying to make others think right now. I think it was really scummy to make the list, ask a couple of questions and disappear without following them up with anything. You're not really doing anything to defend yourself, while from my perspective it's impossible to read you as town when most of what you've done is Saying I'm mafia for reasons that I would have to find the evidence for. For example, saying that my text:content ratio isn't something you can just quote and refer to, I would have to go ahead and point to my filter as to where my reads, pushes and content is and I'm not doing that extra work to prove to you that I'm "playing townie", since almost everyone here agrees that I shouldn't be the lynch today, and you're not giving me an alternative, really. Your push on GB isn't strong or good. You were basically saying he's mafia for using good and well-thought logic. Ok? I think you also mentioned that he was "too careful" about it, that's where YOU need to prove it and provide EVIDENCE and EXAMPLES. You're doing none of these things and instead, you're just hard defending 666 because of his push on me, while I know I'm town and while even you agree with Banks that he hasn't been adamant about getting me lynched, so why read him as town? You being so stubborn and tunneled on me is how you played the other game as well (you were town), but do you really think there is a way for me to read you as town, IF IF IF, just assume IF I'm town? IF you think there is, you still haven't done anything to prove or show it to us, even after Banks and I are trying to give you the opportunity to defend yourself.
Banks thinks I'm too defensive. You say I'm not defensive enough. I think it's time to throw up some reasonable cases all round. Everyone can point out each others apathy and errors and post limits but I'm only going on each case that I can follow. I would like to present some thoughts that are more organised but I'd like to see some too!
|
Jenny, if you love Banks would you even consider banging Roman Numerals?
|
On July 31 2014 18:02 JennyHell wrote:Show nested quote +On July 31 2014 17:53 meatpudding wrote:
Jenny, if you love Banks would you even consider banging Roman Numerals? That's what you decided to take from it? My list isn't sheeped off of anyone elses reads, I decided to make up my own mind about things, hence I am willing to bang seeya, but Banks isn't. If I felt that DC was acting towny enough for me to read him as town, then yeah I'd bang the shit out of him with no regards to my husband.
I wanted to make sure because he wasn't on your list. Important for me to see where your standing is. What I really wanted to ask is how well do you think of him as a wagon?
|
On July 31 2014 18:30 Seeyalater wrote:
If meat was to change his own vote to Clockwork and vote is tied 4-4, what would happen in that case? Asking in case I need to change my vote to stop a tie from happening.
Otherwise I think I'm going to stick with my gut and keep my vote on Meat.
If that happens, whoever had 4 votes first gets lynched.
|
Hey guys how's everyone feeling?
|
|
|
|
|
|
EPT
