[M][N] Default Suspicions Mafia - Page 5

Post a Reply

Prev 1 2 3 4 5 6 Next All

VIVAX420

556 Posts

February 22 2014 06:16 GMT

#1639

On February 22 2014 15:10 VIVAX420 wrote:
pick 1 not 4,and it must be under 7 pages.

VIVAX420

556 Posts

February 22 2014 06:18 GMT

#1640

toad being scum did not help my motivation. being wrong feels pretty bad. also i feel like town is alreayd winning so im not even needed. and if i get lynched its like w/e town is still winning.

VIVAX420

556 Posts

February 22 2014 06:36 GMT

#1641

balla you think rayn is scum?

VIVAX420

556 Posts

February 22 2014 07:06 GMT

#1643

have you consolidated a case against him?

VIVAX420

556 Posts

February 22 2014 07:30 GMT

#1645

balla you are busing him amirite?

VIVAX420

556 Posts

February 22 2014 07:31 GMT

#1646

yeah im right.

VIVAX420

556 Posts

February 22 2014 09:46 GMT

#1650

On February 22 2014 17:12 Palmar wrote:

Show nested quote +

Actually I think YOU THINK you're smurfing for a reason, but you really aren't. You've probably convinced yourself people give a shit about your meta, when they don't, and you think this will somehow help you. You're not doing anything interesting with this smurf, just being a boring normal player, why can't you be a boring normal player on your main account?

why did you write this palmar

VIVAX420

556 Posts

February 22 2014 11:19 GMT

#1652

who is calling for a vig on cute smurf and why

VIVAX420

556 Posts

February 22 2014 14:19 GMT

#1744

i understand why you think im scum, rayn, but you have to understand, I have no idea what's going on.

VIVAX420

556 Posts

February 22 2014 14:22 GMT

#1746

yea but i have until d2 as long as im not viged

VIVAX420

556 Posts

February 22 2014 14:27 GMT

#1750

we'll see but i doubt it

VIVAX420

556 Posts

February 22 2014 15:00 GMT

#1772

On February 22 2014 23:32 Palmar wrote:
Tomorrow we lynch the smurf, he can only be scum.

The only reason you'd ever want to smurf to play normally is if you're an extremely good player who has limited time and is thus is afraid of being misjudged based on less time than usual. Thus it's fair to assume the smurf is an extremely good player.

Now smurf seems to have plenty of time, and he has done and said some incredibly dumb and bad things, so the only reasonable explanation is that he's scum.

Tomorrow we lynch him.

is it just me or is this the worst reasoning to suspect someone ive ever seen?

VIVAX420

556 Posts

February 22 2014 15:02 GMT

#1773

On February 22 2014 23:41 suki wrote:
Balla is town. There's no way he can have the confidence to chase such a bad case against rayn as scum.

wait no this is also in the running

VIVAX420

556 Posts

February 22 2014 15:03 GMT

#1774

@suki please summarize what ballas bad case even is.

VIVAX420

556 Posts

February 22 2014 15:14 GMT

#1777

On February 23 2014 00:08 suki wrote:

Show nested quote +

On February 22 2014 05:13 Balla24 wrote:

On February 22 2014 05:06 raynpelikoneet wrote:
1) wrong. He saw something scummy based one meta and called you out of it. You said you could play like this as scum. That makes Toad's argument not scummy. Maybe wrong, but you can't possibly say it's scummy to call something scummy scummy. That's just retarded.

2) It's not scummy, it's pressure. I don't need to tell you what Toad has done after that, that was not a part of your case. Don't change your argument in the middle of one. That's bullshit.

3) So what? That's not what you say in the last paragraph. You don't say it's scummy and you don't explain why it's scummy. You say you need to hear more from him. That's what you say, not "scummy", but "need to hear more".

If you can't see why I think that his case is scummy for misrepresenting me and using meta on a small amount of contribution then you're not going to be convinced.

2) What are you talking about thats exactly the point. It might be pressure but it also could be fake contribution and to me it looks like fake contribution considering what I think of 1)

3) THATS EXACTLY THE POINT THOUGH. I wanted to see more contribution because all he's done at the point of my case was what I said. He hasn't done anything else now so it just proves my point that he's for some reason hesitant to talk about anything else.

On February 22 2014 05:07 raynpelikoneet wrote:
Balla you are making a new case as we speak. Why don't you answer my concerns in your original case intead of making a new one? And if you think these new points you bring up are so good why were they not in your original case?

That's just wrong. I'm not making up new points, you are making it out to be but i'm not so go somewhere pls.

##vote raynpelikoneet

Everything since you came back is so convoluted and just shitting up the thread. I think you're scum and I think you know toad is town so you want to springboard onto marv/suki/me after toad flips. I don't think your views on toad are consistent, earlier you were voting him. Literally the only reason you think toad is NOT SCUM is because you think marv/suki and I are scum which is total bullshit, especially on suki and I. I don't know your relationship with marv so I don't know how bullshit that is.

There is no universe where scum Balla has the balls to say this to rayn.

why would that take balls to say to rayn?
why wouldn't balls have balls as scum?

I think the main problem is with your logic is that it's built on the assumption that balla is afraid of rayn. And also built on the assumption that if he was scared of rayn, he wouldn't post a case like that. Basically your townread is bad.