Carnival Cruise Mafia - Page 5

Post a Reply

Prev 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Next All

Blazinghand

United States25562 Posts

May 15 2013 02:56 GMT

#1026

On May 15 2013 11:55 Oatsmaster wrote:

Show nested quote +

Because you feel the need to torture yourself.

Can we please consolidate on WoS or Hiro please? Prefer Hiro at this point.
OO totes town.

will eat and read hiro's filter. then comment and consolidate, preferably (at this point) onto OO or WoS

Blazinghand

United States25562 Posts

May 15 2013 03:23 GMT

#1034

On May 15 2013 12:22 ObviousOne wrote:
Hey when this is over let's see who lynched on policy. Policy is pretty easy way out of taking responsibility for your lynch. Keep that in mind in case it's me.

I take full responsibility for your lynch. Everyone else who votes you does as well. We are justice and you shall be struck down as the martyring scum you are

Blazinghand

United States25562 Posts

May 15 2013 03:27 GMT

#1037

OO martyred and self-voted

WoS is scummy and thinking like scum

Blazinghand

United States25562 Posts

May 15 2013 03:32 GMT

#1043

you guys should sign up for chinese grammar micro mafia. it's a voice game happening in like 16 hours and it's gonna be awesome. one slot is open! http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/viewmessage.php?topic_id=412432

Blazinghand

United States25562 Posts

May 15 2013 03:33 GMT

#1046

As always i am down for shenannies. what are your thoughts here oats

Blazinghand

United States25562 Posts

May 15 2013 03:44 GMT

#1050

bote OO or we nolynch...

Blazinghand

United States25562 Posts

May 15 2013 04:01 GMT

#1059

whew

Blazinghand

United States25562 Posts

May 15 2013 04:04 GMT

#1064

oh man did we really derp this

Blazinghand

United States25562 Posts

May 15 2013 04:08 GMT

#1069

really i have no-one but myself to blame. should have stayed on wos

Blazinghand

United States25562 Posts

May 15 2013 04:08 GMT

#1070

you guys are all bad, you have an excuse

Blazinghand

United States25562 Posts

May 15 2013 20:05 GMT

#1137

On May 16 2013 04:57 strongandbig wrote:

Show nested quote +

On May 16 2013 04:23 VayneAuthority wrote:

On May 16 2013 03:50 ObviousOne wrote:

On May 16 2013 03:47 VayneAuthority wrote:

On May 16 2013 03:31 ObviousOne wrote:

On May 16 2013 01:59 slOosh wrote:
I'm starting to doubt my initial read on Rayn. His continued followup and focus on OO looks good and addresses a bulk of my case indirectly. It throws me off that he misses my huge posts but that could be an innocent mistake. I'm most thrown off by how many people have echoed agreement but no one was willing to put votes on him, you know, to actually get him lynched.

And that's the general atmosphere of how I'm reading Day 1. Many people voicing suspicions and pointing fingers, but very few people actually pushing / consolidating / willing to get people lynched. That leads me to believe that we have a more lurky / timid type scum team that is joining on what is available rather than actively working to push lynches. The difficulty is that we have a bunch of lurky town who are doing the exact same thing and letting scum hide amongst them.

My stance upon OO is dependent on if he can back his words with proof - if he can mount a meta case on Vayne and therefore justify his actions and stances, then he doesn't look that bad, given that I don't really find Prom's "scumslip" thing that big, as indicated by my earlier question to him.

People I want to lynch will reveal themselves early tomorrow. If they don't / can't push the cases / suspicions that they voiced in day 1, then we know they were full of fluff and just pretending to look good.

You might be waiting a few games to get a full fledged meta case on Vayne. You know, considering this is game 2 for him on this forum here on this account as far as I am aware. If you call me saying him reacting emotionally to Prom when he said that's what he does as town in this very game (and a far as I'm aware that is where this concept originates, that he will get emotional as town when he is headed for a mislynch), why should I believe it?

So I take his last game and his explanation from his play there and extend it to here and I'm left with conflicting ideas brought up by his own design that he essentially is authoring his own meta on a game by game basis. All I have to go on is his own word regarding this and that's why I don't trust it as it makes me wonder why it is that you DO. If I precluded my own play this game with "I only get demotivated about the game as town" and then did what I did, would you honestly take my word for it they I pre-emotes my actions with reasoning?

Besides all that, meta is icing on the cake and not a sole basis for my case. His points regarding Prp were null, not scummy, and I wanted to hang him for lynching Prp for basically manufactured reasons. His emotional response at 3 votes is absolutely out of this world incongruent with the game state.

you're overanalyzing this shitty player, I could never be so sneaky. I have one playstyle and thats it hurrr

Don't forget who the main wagons were either.

Show me some of that sweet sweet vote analysis you say is one of your strengths. Show us.

alright serious face. If you guys are really intent on visceraeyes being a good player (I cant meta this) then he is honestly really suspicious and not just for omgus reasons. just take one look at his voting history this past day, he was pretty much up to lynch just about anyone and anything. Bounced around so much you cant even get any info on him when he flips later. Completely disassociated himself from his voting and seemed indifferent at actually lynching town or scum.

ve is a really inconsistent player, sometimes he's really good and sometimes he isn't. but he's not one of those consistently really good players

we can't all be blazinghand

Blazinghand

United States25562 Posts

May 15 2013 22:56 GMT

#1153

I would like to know as well

few people truly understand my skills

Blazinghand

United States25562 Posts

May 16 2013 04:57 GMT

#1171

i'm not made out of time at the moment but tomorrow i will be hardpressed to lynch anyone but OO

has to do with how lynched turned out, basically if there were any scum NOT on OO why weren't they when we were one vote from lynching him? they wanted us chasing own tails for +1 day

bh out

/dunked

Blazinghand

United States25562 Posts

May 16 2013 05:41 GMT

#1177

rayn shot is never weird, the man is a scumhunting genius

but yeah looks straightforwards to me, vivax shot vayne, scum shot rayn and sniped vivax. at least the guy got a bullet off before he died

so I see no reason not to ##vote obviousone

Blazinghand

United States25562 Posts

May 16 2013 06:05 GMT

#1179

basically what i'd expect. a lot of meaningles babbles (about chaoser) and some attempts to look more townie. absent the hideous no-lynch today, he looks a bit better, but none of the reasons have changed and really it's inexcusable not to lynch him now

Blazinghand

United States25562 Posts

May 16 2013 06:11 GMT

#1184

On May 16 2013 15:05 WaveofShadow wrote:

Show nested quote +

No kill on Prom/BH worries me. The Vivax shot was honestly smart; the guy seems to pick up a strong blue role every game and every game he gets sniped for it. I can't say it was an attempt to frame me either since BH is still alive as well; despite the fact that he dropped me as prime target yesterday he was making it fairly clear he still wanted me dead. Rayn shot was obvious as well.

I've already been called out for this, but the fact that Prom and BH are both still alive and both were the primary proponents of me being scum yesterday means one of them must be scum imo. I am aware the Prom never attempted to push me beyond his initial case/suspicion but it fits with what I'm thinking. I'll attempt to build on this as the day progresses but it really doesn't feel good to me at all.

so what you're saying is, since prom didn't push you, and i was the one who really pushed you, one of BH and BH must be scum

Now i'm replying to you not for your sake, since you're almost certainly scum, but just to lay it clear for everyone else: it's utterly unreasonable to think i'm scum for that reason., because

man my head is spinning

like, scum would shoot me for pushing one of their scumbuddies, WoS, that's the theory right? Like, WoS is saying "If BH is so onto me, and so pushing me, why didn't my scumbuddies just shoot BH? clearly BH is scum!" but like this would require both woS and me to be scum, and for

wow i literally have a headache

look, WoS's logic, that scum would shoot to protect him from me because i was onto him, and didn't, therefore i'm scum, literally only makes sense if WoS is scum, but then it doesn't make sense because why would I push a scumbuddy so hard D1

i'm dizzy

i need to lie down

fuck