|
|
On September 22 2013 06:16 las91 wrote:Show nested quote +On September 22 2013 06:16 wei2coolman wrote: don't know how zuna gets flipped everytime. lol. Because Looper can just run through them and eventually get to him.
Also because he used his summoners before Looper even got to him and didn't auto attack him once, he's awful.
|
On September 22 2013 06:16 las91 wrote:Show nested quote +On September 22 2013 06:16 wei2coolman wrote: don't know how zuna gets flipped everytime. lol. Because Looper can just run through them and eventually get to him. Because he doesn't get Ghost on Ashe vs Singed like Genja
|
wtf cant those ppl count? there might be no tiebreakers and they say like its 100% sure -.-
|
Zuna deals 180 damage as an AD Carry! At 35 minutes.
|
On September 22 2013 06:17 nojitosunrise wrote: Vulcun is eliminated?
Yes, They needed to 2-0 to tie with anyone.
|
fucking rofl singed gives no fucks
|
On September 22 2013 06:09 Dan HH wrote:Show nested quote +On September 22 2013 06:06 Porishan wrote: wow foreigner ADC still .... horrible If it's the first game you're watching from this tournament, cause Puszu & Turtle did really well
i missed the LD games (nearly all of them), was tabzz doing bad? edit: gambit botlane is questionable imo, i'm with you there
|
On September 22 2013 06:15 wei2coolman wrote:Show nested quote +On September 22 2013 06:14 Kenpark wrote:On September 22 2013 06:12 HorsemasterK wrote:On September 22 2013 06:09 ManBaker wrote:On September 22 2013 06:05 las91 wrote:On September 22 2013 06:05 SidianTheBard wrote:On September 22 2013 06:03 ManBaker wrote:On September 22 2013 06:02 Amethyst21 wrote: Starting to think that TSM were right and Group B is terrible (outside of fnatic) TSM would get destroyed by both Ozone and most definitely Gambit And everybody in group B would get completely crushed by OMG and SKT. TSM has shown close games against SKT, they would not get "destroyed" by the Ozone that has appeared here. Yeah because Gambit and Fnatic would get destroyed by SKT and OMG? Based on what? TSM is a bad team and they'd have finished 3rd/4th regargless of the group. Dyrus' butthurt comment about the groups' difficulty was just a passive aggressive "we'll go out because we got in the stronger team" crap OMG and SKT are the best teams in groups, there is little to debate there. TSM looks stronger than every team in group B except possibly Fnatic, but its impossible to tell how well Fnatic is playing, since the other teams in their group are tilting so hard now. Just lol. US fanboi much. TSM could beat ozone, dunno about gambit. alex ich too much better than regi imo. You could say the same with Diamond-TOO and Darien-Dyrus. Maybe you can leave out "too much", if you don'T want to offend the fanbois, but still.
|
On September 22 2013 06:17 Kiett wrote:Show nested quote +On September 22 2013 06:15 Shikyo wrote:On September 22 2013 06:14 Kenpark wrote:On September 22 2013 06:12 HorsemasterK wrote:On September 22 2013 06:09 ManBaker wrote:On September 22 2013 06:05 las91 wrote:On September 22 2013 06:05 SidianTheBard wrote:On September 22 2013 06:03 ManBaker wrote:On September 22 2013 06:02 Amethyst21 wrote: Starting to think that TSM were right and Group B is terrible (outside of fnatic) TSM would get destroyed by both Ozone and most definitely Gambit And everybody in group B would get completely crushed by OMG and SKT. TSM has shown close games against SKT, they would not get "destroyed" by the Ozone that has appeared here. Yeah because Gambit and Fnatic would get destroyed by SKT and OMG? Based on what? TSM is a bad team and they'd have finished 3rd/4th regargless of the group. Dyrus' butthurt comment about the groups' difficulty was just a passive aggressive "we'll go out because we got in the stronger team" crap OMG and SKT are the best teams in groups, there is little to debate there. TSM looks stronger than every team in group B except possibly Fnatic, but its impossible to tell how well Fnatic is playing, since the other teams in their group are tilting so hard now. Just lol. US fanboi much. Not really, I agree o_O I don't even like TSM You agree that "it's impossible to tell how well Fnatic is playing" just because they're beating people so hard that they look shitty? Does that mean it's impossible to tell how well OMG is playing when they stomp GG.eu because GG sucks? Of course people who get owned look bad. Why does that mean the people who beat them aren't good lol. Nah I just agree that OMG and SKT are the best teams in groups and that only Fnatic looks better than TSM
|
So if ozone and Gambit both win does that mean there's a tiebreaker since they're 1-1 in the head-to-head?
|
On September 22 2013 06:14 Kenpark wrote:Show nested quote +On September 22 2013 06:12 HorsemasterK wrote:On September 22 2013 06:09 ManBaker wrote:On September 22 2013 06:05 las91 wrote:On September 22 2013 06:05 SidianTheBard wrote:On September 22 2013 06:03 ManBaker wrote:On September 22 2013 06:02 Amethyst21 wrote: Starting to think that TSM were right and Group B is terrible (outside of fnatic) TSM would get destroyed by both Ozone and most definitely Gambit And everybody in group B would get completely crushed by OMG and SKT. TSM has shown close games against SKT, they would not get "destroyed" by the Ozone that has appeared here. Yeah because Gambit and Fnatic would get destroyed by SKT and OMG? Based on what? TSM is a bad team and they'd have finished 3rd/4th regargless of the group. Dyrus' butthurt comment about the groups' difficulty was just a passive aggressive "we'll go out because we got in the stronger team" crap OMG and SKT are the best teams in groups, there is little to debate there. TSM looks stronger than every team in group B except possibly Fnatic, but its impossible to tell how well Fnatic is playing, since the other teams in their group are tilting so hard now. Just lol. US fanboi much. He says "TSM looks" not "is", which is his opinion. Fine by me. His assessment of group B being a gathering of choking/bad teams and Fnatic being impossible to rate accurately because of this is pretty much spot on, though.
|
mineski to beat sso now to avoid tiebreakers
|
On September 22 2013 06:17 Lord Tolkien wrote: Honestly, Sid failed Vulcun this game.
During the first Dragon fight which saw Xsmithe steal it and 2 deaths from Vulcun, Sycho Sid cancelled his ulti at a crucial time. If he didn't, Vulcun would've cleaned house.
Mein gott. <___< The entire team didn't play that well.They lost as a team.Zuna tried really hard for the lvp though.
|
On September 22 2013 06:18 ketchup wrote:Yes, They needed to 2-0 to tie with anyone. not 100% true. if Vulcan wins over Gambit and Ozone loses to Mineski (not likely) we have a three way tie
|
On September 22 2013 06:18 Affenaffe wrote:Show nested quote +On September 22 2013 06:09 Dan HH wrote:On September 22 2013 06:06 Porishan wrote: wow foreigner ADC still .... horrible If it's the first game you're watching from this tournament, cause Puszu & Turtle did really well i missed the LD games (nearly all of them), was tabzz doing bad? All of LD is doing bad, seems like a mental problem. Tabzz did some horrible dives and didn't have much impact overall
|
On September 22 2013 06:19 Dodgin wrote: mineski to beat sso now to avoid tiebreakers
gambit can still lose to vulcun
|
On September 22 2013 06:18 Volband wrote:Show nested quote +On September 22 2013 06:15 wei2coolman wrote:On September 22 2013 06:14 Kenpark wrote:On September 22 2013 06:12 HorsemasterK wrote:On September 22 2013 06:09 ManBaker wrote:On September 22 2013 06:05 las91 wrote:On September 22 2013 06:05 SidianTheBard wrote:On September 22 2013 06:03 ManBaker wrote:On September 22 2013 06:02 Amethyst21 wrote: Starting to think that TSM were right and Group B is terrible (outside of fnatic) TSM would get destroyed by both Ozone and most definitely Gambit And everybody in group B would get completely crushed by OMG and SKT. TSM has shown close games against SKT, they would not get "destroyed" by the Ozone that has appeared here. Yeah because Gambit and Fnatic would get destroyed by SKT and OMG? Based on what? TSM is a bad team and they'd have finished 3rd/4th regargless of the group. Dyrus' butthurt comment about the groups' difficulty was just a passive aggressive "we'll go out because we got in the stronger team" crap OMG and SKT are the best teams in groups, there is little to debate there. TSM looks stronger than every team in group B except possibly Fnatic, but its impossible to tell how well Fnatic is playing, since the other teams in their group are tilting so hard now. Just lol. US fanboi much. TSM could beat ozone, dunno about gambit. alex ich too much better than regi imo. You could say the same with Diamond-TOO and Darien-Dyrus. Maybe you can leave out "too much", if you don'T want to offend the fanbois, but still. WT + xpecial significantly better than voidle + genja tho. It favors Gambit overall, but considering how these games are being played out I think TSM > ozone tho.
|
On September 22 2013 06:19 las91 wrote: So if ozone and Gambit both win does that mean there's a tiebreaker since they're 1-1 in the head-to-head?
Yes, it will be played after the Group B games are finished.
|
Straight outta Johto18973 Posts
I think this game also shows Vulcun should not try to be C9-lite because they can't execute it. They basically had one of the most C9 of team comps and couldn't run it.
|
How does the tiebreaker work and when will it be played?
|
|
|
|
|
|