EPTShooting of Trayvon Martin - Page 246
| Forum Index > General Forum |
This is a sensitive and complex issue, please do not make comments without first reading the facts, which are cataloged in the OP. If you make an uninformed post, or one that isn't relevant to the discussion, you will be moderated. If in doubt, don't post. | ||
|
dAPhREAk
Nauru12397 Posts
| ||
|
Kaitlin
United States2958 Posts
| ||
|
m4inbrain
1505 Posts
| ||
|
Millitron
United States2611 Posts
On July 03 2013 02:41 Djzapz wrote: It's another reminder that you have to be careful, for sure. That said, the tea party's image is also largely based on stupid stuff that they've said or done. Michele Bachmann has said more than her fair share of crazy stuff. Edit: And also sometimes they're just too far on the right, and us left-wing folks simply vehemently disagree. There ARE sane Tea Party members. The media just never reports on them because they're too sane. Sanity doesn't make for good ratings. I think the big lesson to take from this trial is that, as far as the media is concerned, ratings > truth. And nothing improves ratings like conflict, so they try their hardest to stir shit up. The 24-hour "News" cycle is the most despicable system on Earth. | ||
|
Kaitlin
United States2958 Posts
| ||
|
Zeevo
148 Posts
| ||
|
farvacola
United States18869 Posts
| ||
|
crms
United States11933 Posts
On July 03 2013 03:12 Kaitlin wrote: Serino has already testified that no injuries are required to show self-defense, so good luck with this witness. So I guess they just want this lady to speak about how minor the injuries are in the hopes the jury ignores the last 2 weeks of trial? | ||
|
FatChicksUnited
Canada214 Posts
| ||
|
dAPhREAk
Nauru12397 Posts
so much for the absence of blood argument. | ||
|
xDaunt
United States17988 Posts
| ||
|
Fuzzyhead
Germany55 Posts
On July 03 2013 03:15 xDaunt wrote: This is total expert-whore testimony that could anger the jury. How so? | ||
|
plgElwood
Germany518 Posts
| ||
|
Kaitlin
United States2958 Posts
On July 03 2013 03:14 Zeevo wrote: any up-to-date predictions on how this is going to go? who is guilty? It's not really a whodunnit. It's either Zimmerman is guilty or Zimmerman is not guilty. Barring a miracle or completely retarded jury, this appears to be a clear not guilty. | ||
|
m4inbrain
1505 Posts
On July 03 2013 03:14 dAPhREAk wrote: "head injuries consistent with hitting concrete" so much for the absence of blood argument. You pretty much know why there is no blood. Hit your head somewhere so hard that it starts bleeding, and then check the surface, if you can see any blood there. For you to have blood on the surface, you need to touch it again edit: not that it would matter though. | ||
|
Plansix
United States60190 Posts
Juries can respond poorly to "hired gun" experts. Its like you are paying for someone to agree with your case. | ||
|
xDaunt
United States17988 Posts
| ||
|
Plansix
United States60190 Posts
On July 03 2013 03:17 xDaunt wrote: I thought it was already established that it was raining that night. Gotta remind people just to make sure they know how rain works? | ||
|
dAPhREAk
Nauru12397 Posts
On July 03 2013 03:14 dAPhREAk wrote: "head injuries consistent with hitting concrete" so much for the absence of blood argument. i think her main point is that its not consistent with repeated bashing as zimmerman has said although its consistent with one strike. | ||
|
m4inbrain
1505 Posts
On July 03 2013 03:18 dAPhREAk wrote: i think her main point is that its not consistent with repeated bashing as zimmerman has said although its consistent with one strike. Either its lag, or you're spot on, she just said that. | ||
| ||
