|
Not making a game change suggestion, I'm just revealing a vision in my head of my understanding of the game.
Protoss: Static defense that attacks air and ground(Cannon) Mobile ground to ground offense(Zealot)
Terran: Partially static defense(Bunker) that co-functions with offense that attacks air or ground(marine). Defense that is ground to ground or air to air(Planetary fortress lifting off as air to air defense?)
Zerg: A non static defense, in otherwords, a defensive offense. Zerglings multiplying on creep for a cost, but slowly losing life off creep. Air to air defense? (Overlords mutating in to static air to air defense)
Conclusion: This is just a perception of races that are suppose to be more assymetrically different, but proportionally equal. It should be possible to quote blizzard on their assymetrical approach, that their goal is for assymetrically different races.
The Roach Queen:
Tech Lab and Reactor are Terran's macro mechanics. The tech lab limits marauder production(No dual production from reactor).
The Roach Queen: Unlocks roach: Observation: Queen/Roach warren cost the same, same time to build. Zerg's macro mechanic, limiting roach production by roaches only being capable of being produced via queen's larvae.
Roaches are naturally fast.
Conclusion: Micro offensive roach, Offensively defending ling.
Observation: In either alpha or beta queens had the ability to "Deep Tunnel" This meant that zerg could place minimal defense at each hatchery, let's say, one spine crawler. Then, based on which base is targeted, you could deep tunnel all your queens collectively to the particular hatch and potentially cast multiple tranfusions on 1 spine crawler.
This ability was removed from the game.
|
United States1963 Posts
On July 04 2012 04:30 AtlasMech wrote:
(Planetary fortress lifting off as air to air defense?)
You lost me at that part... Planetaries don't lift.
Edit: Never mind.. Just realized you're talking about what you think should be added to the game? I don't quite understand because you say this is all "your understanding of the game"
|
|
|
I'm confused. I think you're playing custom maps.
|
On July 04 2012 04:32 LovE- wrote:Show nested quote +On July 04 2012 04:30 AtlasMech wrote:
(Planetary fortress lifting off as air to air defense?) You lost me at that part... Planetaries don't lift.
I said planetaries don't lift?
|
so what are we supposed to discuss? why the queen ability was removed or something about defence?
|
"Conclusion: Micro offensive roach, Offensively defending ling."
Sorry but what does this mean? Your post is very confusing and I'm not sure what it is supposed to achieve.
|
Hey man. We all have random and weird thoughts when we are high, that doesn't mean we should write them down and even further doesn't mean we should post on TL. Need some cohesion and transitions man.
|
United States1963 Posts
On July 04 2012 04:33 AtlasMech wrote:Show nested quote +On July 04 2012 04:32 LovE- wrote:On July 04 2012 04:30 AtlasMech wrote:
(Planetary fortress lifting off as air to air defense?) You lost me at that part... Planetaries don't lift. I said planetaries don't lift?
You said they lift for air to air...
They most certainly DO NOT lift.
|
This sounds like Kyfoid's suggest...oh wait, you have his username from the BNet forums. But since this is TL, I'll take it seriously. What's your point? Are you just aimlessly ranting?
Also, guys, this is Kyfoid, the hated troll from the blizz forums. He made this as a serious suggestion over there.
|
lol i think TC has lost everyone
|
On July 04 2012 04:35 LovE- wrote:Show nested quote +On July 04 2012 04:33 AtlasMech wrote:On July 04 2012 04:32 LovE- wrote:On July 04 2012 04:30 AtlasMech wrote:
(Planetary fortress lifting off as air to air defense?) You lost me at that part... Planetaries don't lift. I said planetaries don't lift? You said they lift for air to air... They most certainly DO NOT lift.
Oh, I'm sorry, this was just the initial perception that struck me.
|
United States1963 Posts
Looking back at your post history you have been temp banned/warned numerous times for creating OPs like this one.. so that explains a lot.
What are you trying to do with this OP. I don't know what exactly we should be talking about.. besides that none of us understand it.
|
I think this should be blog
|
On July 04 2012 04:35 Amridell wrote:
This sounds like Kyfoid's suggest...oh wait, you have his username from the BNet forums. But since this is TL, I'll take it seriously. What's your point? Are you just aimlessly ranting?
Also, guys, this is Kyfoid, the hated troll from the blizz forums. He made this as a serious suggestion over there.
We can't have an exchange of aimless rant reflections?
|
On July 04 2012 04:38 AtlasMech wrote:Show nested quote +On July 04 2012 04:35 Amridell wrote:
This sounds like Kyfoid's suggest...oh wait, you have his username from the BNet forums. But since this is TL, I'll take it seriously. What's your point? Are you just aimlessly ranting?
Also, guys, this is Kyfoid, the hated troll from the blizz forums. He made this as a serious suggestion over there. We can't have an exchange of aimless rant reflections?
Actually, without direction or benefit, no~
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
EPT
