|
On April 03 2012 10:11 WhiteR0se wrote:
So bad pairs, very bad draw ;/
Karate < Circuit Breakers > DeSka
Pike < Circuit Breakers > DinOt
GoTuNk! < Circuit Breakers > TriX
good players have to eliminate each other in zvz or pvp (boring match ups), but it could be a great matches if...:
karate goes vs trix (nice match, dont u think so ?)
Pike goes vs Gotunk (nice match, dont u think so?)
and deska goes vs some good terran or toss ;;
same with dinot....
I don`t like if u pit best players in beggining on zvz matches... and next matches will be just boring
It could be just great if u will switch players to make best pairs, for great fights, for great show matches, with match ups like zvt pvz (mostly)
^^ think about it, u pay - u set music...
Really bad idea, having one person have the ability to eliminate randomization strictly for game quality via seeding and match fixing. Pretty sure 3 mirror match ups far outweigh the speculation of abuse.
|
Day 1 Stats (solely from recent ISL performances):
+ Show Spoiler +Group 1
Choosy: 4-0 ZvP // 2-0 ZvT [Wins: Miso, Terranos, Specter]
Castro: 2-0 ZvT // 2-0 ZvP [Wins: Boom, White]
Reaper: 0-3 PvP // 5-1 PvZ [Wins: Modesty, n0kia // Losses: dOTY]
Southpark: 3-1 ZvT [Wins: Kashu]
Group 2
Bibiane: 2-0 TvT // 3-0 TvP [Wins: Noise, Talent]
Plumbum: 0-2 ZvZ // 3-0 ZvT [Wins: CfgosCuba // Losses: Deska]
Shad: 3-0 ZvP [Wins: Jeuxx]
Alfio: 3-0 PvZ [Wins: inf3cted]
Group 3
Terror: 1-0 Tvz // 3-0 TvP [Wins: Kashu, Zpad]
Elena: 0-3 TvT // 5-2 TvP [Wins: Favorite. Cool2be // Losses: Gag]
Dewalt: 2-2 PvZ // 3-1 PvP [Wins: Jumper, Zpad // Losses: kolll]
Ramms: 1-3 TvZ // 5-2 PvT [Wins: Shocker_40, Cryoc // Losses: KazioWichura]
Group 4
dOTY: 6-0 PvP [Wins: Semih, Reaper, Sayle]
LML: 2-0 PvZ // 4-5 PvT [Wins: Sheepdog. Boom // Losses: Bender, TTF]
Gag: 5-0 TvT [Wins: Justice, Elena]
Vanatir: 2-1 PvP // 3-0 PvZ [Wins: Rainei, Spy-faith // Losses: White]
Predicts:+ Show Spoiler +
Choosy < Circuit Breakers > CastrO
Reaper < Circuit Breakers > SouthPark
Reaper< Neo Aztec >CastrO
Choosy< Neo Aztec >Southpark
Choosy< Heartbreak Ridge >Reaper
Castro 2-0 // Choosy 2-1
Bibiane < Circuit Breakers > Plumbum
Shad < Circuit Breakers > AlfiO
Bibiane< Neo Aztec > AlfiO
Shad< Neo Aztec >Plumbum
Bibiane< Heartbreak Ridge >Plumbum
AlfiO 2-0 // Bibiane 2-1
TerrOr < Circuit Breakers > Elena
Dewalt < Circuit Breakers > Ramms
TerrOr< Neo Aztec >Dewalt
Elena< Neo Aztec >Ramms
TerrOr< Heartbreak Ridge >Ramms
Dewalt 2-0 // TerrOr 2-1
dOTY < Circuit Breakers > LML
gag < Circuit Breakers > vanatir
dOTY< Neo Aztec >gag
Vanatir< Neo Aztec >LML
gag< Heartbreak Ridge >Vanatir
dOTY 2-0 // gag 2-1
Just curious do the winners of each group know who they will play after or is it yet to be determined?
|
Just curious do the winners of each group know who they will play after or is it yet to be determined?
^ Does this mean for the tournament, under the assumption that the winners of the group would just be kept in order?
|
Sorry but I couldn't find what time this is going to be played
|
On April 03 2012 10:31 Game wrote:
Just curious do the winners of each group know who they will play after or is it yet to be determined?
^ Does this mean for the tournament, under the assumption that the winners of the group would just be kept in order?
Hm, just curious if there's any benefit for Going 2-0 or 2-1, as in 2-0 would play a 2-1 seed and so on? (or it's going to be re-randomized with the other 4 invites?)
|
On April 03 2012 10:38 Terrorterran wrote:
Sorry but I couldn't find what time this is going to be played
Don't mean to sound like a dick, but I guess we just assumed ISL was uniformly played at 19CET every Saturday. It's one of many things we need to fix in the OP tomorrow, sorry about that.
|
On April 03 2012 10:39 dRaW wrote:Show nested quote +On April 03 2012 10:31 Game wrote:
Just curious do the winners of each group know who they will play after or is it yet to be determined?
^ Does this mean for the tournament, under the assumption that the winners of the group would just be kept in order? Hm, just curious if there's any benefit for Going 2-0 or 2-1, as in 2-0 would play a 2-1 seed and so on? (or it's going to be re-randomized with the other 4 invites?)
No benefit other than you qualified for ISL3, everything will be re-randomized.
|
Russian Federation17 Posts
Gl to all players! special GL :D to : AlFio. ezeOnzerg, Modesty, all russian players!
P.S. DeSka - not russian player! :D
|
Russian Federation484 Posts
btw suprised that no one wrote it : MAPS ARE GODAWFUL
|
On April 03 2012 10:50 reps)Plumbum wrote:
btw suprised that no one wrote it : MAPS ARE GODAWFUL
The maps are good for zerg... Check TLPD %, only problem is that Z/P>>T on Aztec it's pretty much free win.
|
On April 03 2012 11:08 dRaW wrote:Show nested quote +On April 03 2012 10:50 reps)Plumbum wrote:
btw suprised that no one wrote it : MAPS ARE GODAWFUL The maps are good for zerg... Check TLPD %, only problem is that Z/P>>T on Aztec it's pretty much free win.
+ Show Spoiler + Cannot wait for every T to win on Aztec
|
gogo; LML, NoisE, GoTuNk and DinOt ^^
|
On April 03 2012 11:10 Game wrote:Show nested quote +On April 03 2012 11:08 dRaW wrote:On April 03 2012 10:50 reps)Plumbum wrote:
btw suprised that no one wrote it : MAPS ARE GODAWFUL The maps are good for zerg... Check TLPD %, only problem is that Z/P>>T on Aztec it's pretty much free win. + Show Spoiler + Cannot wait for every T to win on Aztec
+ Show Spoiler +I think you forgot i'm playing in these groups
|
On April 03 2012 14:02 Shotcoder wrote:Show nested quote +On April 03 2012 11:10 Game wrote:On April 03 2012 11:08 dRaW wrote:On April 03 2012 10:50 reps)Plumbum wrote:
btw suprised that no one wrote it : MAPS ARE GODAWFUL The maps are good for zerg... Check TLPD %, only problem is that Z/P>>T on Aztec it's pretty much free win. + Show Spoiler + Cannot wait for every T to win on Aztec + Show Spoiler +I think you forgot i'm playing in these groups
+ Show Spoiler +well lets put it this way: aztec used to be horribly unfair (39% tvz 34% tvp), then kespa released neo aztec where the only thing they changed was they made the nat dropable, and since then it's been a pretty balanced map (53%, 50%). You know what you must do.
|
On April 03 2012 14:26 hacklebeast wrote:+ Show Spoiler +well lets put it this way: aztec used to be horribly unfair (39% tvz 34% tvp), then kespa released neo aztec where the only thing they changed was they made the nat dropable, and since then it's been a pretty balanced map (53%, 50%). You know what you must do.
+ Show Spoiler +find the cliff and abuse the terran unbalance as hard as possible? 
|
fuck yeeeaahh !!!
so pumped !
go go polish players !!!!!!!!!! :D
also I think you should use Neo Heartbreak Ridge ?
would be cool 
cheers
|
On April 03 2012 14:26 hacklebeast wrote:Show nested quote +On April 03 2012 14:02 Shotcoder wrote:On April 03 2012 11:10 Game wrote:On April 03 2012 11:08 dRaW wrote:On April 03 2012 10:50 reps)Plumbum wrote:
btw suprised that no one wrote it : MAPS ARE GODAWFUL The maps are good for zerg... Check TLPD %, only problem is that Z/P>>T on Aztec it's pretty much free win. + Show Spoiler + Cannot wait for every T to win on Aztec + Show Spoiler +I think you forgot i'm playing in these groups + Show Spoiler +well lets put it this way: aztec used to be horribly unfair (39% tvz 34% tvp), then kespa released neo aztec where the only thing they changed was they made the nat dropable, and since then it's been a pretty balanced map (53%, 50%). You know what you must do.
I was looking @ that but the sample size is too small to counter balance the old stats.
|
On April 03 2012 15:43 Sinedd wrote:fuck yeeeaahh !!! so pumped ! go go polish players !!!!!!!!!! :D also I think you should use Neo Heartbreak Ridge ? would be cool cheers
Another typo to be fixed*
|
Russian Federation337 Posts
|
Russian Federation181 Posts
puting aztec in map pool pretty dumb move, ofc if its not for eleminating all terrans, in this case its gosu move, lol.
|
|
|
|
|
|
EPT
