EPTI wonder if nevake can escape this sort of thing...
Gretech served Jon747 with a copyright notice - Page 3
| Forum Index > BW General |
motbob
United States12546 Posts
I wonder if nevake can escape this sort of thing... | ||
|
Zozma
United States1626 Posts
On October 30 2009 11:50 motbob wrote: If he can't, dark times ahead. Other people can always upload more videos, but the amount of Starcraft history that would be lost is just staggering.TT I wonder if nevake can escape this sort of thing... | ||
|
Taku
Canada2036 Posts
| ||
GTR
51507 Posts
They don't even have the rights to show the games on their GOMTV VOD service in Korea. | ||
|
hiro protagonist
1294 Posts
to anyone's knowledge, has this ever happened before? also this would not be the first time jon747 overreacted to something that was not a big deal. A lot of this feels fishy to me | ||
|
domane
Canada1606 Posts
If this means no more videos from MSL + OSL + Proleague, then yeah I think this is a huge deal. | ||
|
pR0gR4m3R
Spain1446 Posts
| ||
p4NDemik
United States13896 Posts
I hope. | ||
|
Camlito
Australia4040 Posts
On October 31 2009 17:33 p4NDemik wrote: nevake doesn't have any GomTV MSL vods/Gom Classic vods at all I think so it's clear from scrutiny by Gretech. I hope. He has ShowMeTheMSL Fpvods, i think. | ||
|
Drunk Hobo Guy
3 Posts
Jon747 (1 week ago) Guys! Remember! This channel is going to be deleted if It happens a big war for SC copyright between Blizzard and KeSPA. Jon747 Jon747 (1 week ago) gejedd// GomTV MSL Season 1, 2, 3, 4 and FPVOD related to GomTV MSL ect. gejedd gejedd (1 week ago) could someone please explain what videos you cant post anymore, just gom?? or all videos?  | ||
|
.risingdragoon
United States3021 Posts
wow, that's a huge loss | ||
|
pR0gR4m3R
Spain1446 Posts
According to this, he can still upload all regarded ProLeague, MSL and OSL, meanwhile it has nothing related to GOM TV, like sponsorships, ect.. BTW I must say I got GOM TV vods in my youtube channel, not many, but havent received a warning yet | ||
|
Liquid`Nazgul
22427 Posts
1) If someone files a copyright complaint, do they do this to youtube or to the owner (Baezzi) of the channel? 2) If it's youtube, does TY only pass along the message without actually taking down the previously uploaded vods themselves? It seems Baezzi is still in control of which videos he wants to take down. 3) Can someone fake copyright complaints since it makes so little sense with the gretech/gom/msl stuff | ||
|
aqui
Germany1023 Posts
| ||
|
aqui
Germany1023 Posts
On October 30 2009 13:02 Zozma wrote: If he can't, dark times ahead. Other people can always upload more videos, but the amount of Starcraft history that would be lost is just staggering. were do you think the torrents com form *cough. i dont thinka anything woud be lost. | ||
|
LordWeird
United States3411 Posts
| ||
|
Too_MuchZerg
Finland2818 Posts
If Teamliquid improves VODs section then nobody has to visit youtube to see those ugly VOD names typed there. | ||
|
abcb
United States136 Posts
On October 31 2009 20:46 Liquid`Nazgul wrote: I'm really bad at this but um.. some questions maybe some here are more experienced at it. 1) If someone files a copyright complaint, do they do this to youtube or to the owner (Baezzi) of the channel? 2) If it's youtube, does TY only pass along the message without actually taking down the previously uploaded vods themselves? It seems Baezzi is still in control of which videos he wants to take down. 3) Can someone fake copyright complaints since it makes so little sense with the gretech/gom/msl stuff From what i remember, this is how it should work. 1) When someone files a copyright complaint, they can do this to youtube and the owner. If they serve it to the owner, it's likely a demand letter of some kind asking the owner to take it down without legal trouble. If they serve it the ISP, then it's an actual DMCA violation form they filled out and serve it to youtube. 2) When YT is served with DMCA violation notice, Youtube has to take down the alleged videos. However they will pass on the message to the owner, and owner has i think 20 days to dispute about whether the content violates copyright. 3) I am pretty sure it's hard to fake it, google probably has team of lawyers checking out dmca violations and make sure they are legit before taking down the video. | ||
|
Mykill
Canada3402 Posts
| ||
|
RaGe
Belgium9949 Posts
On October 24 2009 02:12 Radivel-X17 wrote: Nevake next? What protects Nevake? lol dude are you serious? the uploader that YOU yourself stole from TL is having copyright issues, and the first thing you reply is "what about TLs account"? | ||
| ||
