|
On October 14 2009 01:45 Licmyobelisk wrote:Show nested quote +On October 14 2009 01:41 Johnranger-123 wrote:On October 14 2009 01:37 never_toss wrote:On October 14 2009 01:34 Johnranger-123 wrote: I have to say this, GG girls, its been a long run, but we have proof (kinda) that it is a good idea, Everybody is happy. Also another thing, can't guys get breast cancer too? eww dont even start lOL No seriously, this is a big concern for me. If we spread the news, what becomes the nextstep? Milk farms of men to help combat breast cancer for everyone! We either have to make sure this never happens (by setting up a TL spy academy), or destory this information forever.... Haven't you heard of sperm banks? and are you related to HamerD? seems like you guys have the same ideas *wink* *wink* I don't know who HamerD is. Also I forgot about sperm banks, they are already one step ahead! I just really want a TL spy academy
|
|
please pan out please pan out please pan out please pan out
edit: STUPID SNOPES!
I did hear that an actual study confirmed that ingesting semen may make it easier to get pregnant though because the body becomes accustomed to the dna in the sperm and doesn't try to instagib it anymore.
|
|
On October 14 2009 02:30 Johnranger-123 wrote:Why dude, why... :'(
nooooooooooooooooooooooooooo
|
Reason and scepticism should be ban worthy in cases like these.
|
On October 14 2009 03:46 Hittegods wrote:Reason and scepticism should be ban worthy in cases like these. ![[image loading]](http://img183.imageshack.us/img183/1199/humpf.png) I AGREE! HERESY!!
|
You know, it's still true. Take your girlfriend's chemotherapy. It is true that some ingested medications travel through semen...
|
This could be a totally awesome new pickup line O_O...
|
United States24574 Posts
I did pranks like these before on my campus. They work surprisingly well...
|
|
As interesting as this is, they need to check their data for confounding variables. Why do I say this? Because semen is essentially a protein shake and there are a lot of women who do not eat enough meat.
Yes, yes, I know, most of you will probably tell me to shut up for raining on the proverbial parade, but good science has nothing to do with popularity. Science isn't a democracy.
Edit: Just saw that Snopes WTF!pwned this notion.
|
False + would be a correlation and not causation, Salv is right.
|
On October 14 2009 07:09 Mortality wrote:
As interesting as this is, they need to check their data for confounding variables. Why do I say this? Because semen is essentially a protein shake and there are a lot of women who do not eat enough meat.
Yes, yes, I know, most of you will probably tell me to shut up for raining on the proverbial parade, but good science has nothing to do with popularity. Science isn't a democracy.
Edit: Just saw that Snopes WTF!pwned this notion.
This whole protein being the miracle nutrient thing is so 1970. If you live in the US, you're getting enough protein. Seriously, the only people still suffering from protein deficiencies live in like Africa and Southeast Asia.
On another note, several studies even indicate that eating too much animal protein can actually lead to osteoporosis, since metabolizing proteins produces sulfuric acid which can lead to acidosis and the consequent inhibition of osteoblastic activity over time (specifically animal protein, since collagen and some other similar abundant animal proteins contain tons of cysteine residues (i.e. you get a lot more sulfur compared to vegetable protein).
I'm not trying to say eating meat is bad, just that you don't need (or want) a lot of it to get the protein you need.
|
|
|
|