EPTGLHF Magazine - First real SC 2 magazine - Page 6
| Forum Index > SC2 General |
|
giann
France7 Posts
| ||
|
Liveon
Netherlands1083 Posts
 | ||
|
Derrida
2885 Posts
| ||
|
Cereb
Denmark3388 Posts
| ||
|
RolleMcKnolle
Germany1054 Posts
| ||
|
looknohands119
United States815 Posts
| ||
|
TOCHMY
Sweden1692 Posts
| ||
|
Grobyc
Canada18410 Posts
 | ||
|
MiacroISBADK
United States45 Posts
| ||
|
YouthSC
United Kingdom355 Posts
| ||
|
Proxee
63 Posts
| ||
|
chocopan
Japan986 Posts
(Need a serious editor or two in there however. Not quite mag-standard writing yet.) | ||
|
ETisME
12494 Posts
very well structured and layout is good! | ||
|
bartus88
Netherlands491 Posts
I'm not criticizing you for putting in an article about Combat-Ex, I do frown upon it but the decision is yours. I'm only putting out that it is very hypocritical. | ||
|
JanLui
France50 Posts
TY | ||
|
RolleMcKnolle
Germany1054 Posts
On April 26 2012 19:28 bartus88 wrote: A small note of criticism. The magazine begins with a column from the person I assume is the editor-in-chief (or whatever the correct term is), talking about how you prefer quality over quantity and will not compensate by putting bad articled simply for fill. However, the second article is about Combat-Ex giving a lecture of some sort about BM. Basically, a terrible member of the community gives advice on a terrible subject. I couldn't think of an article with less quality, if you really meant what you had said in your message from the staff, that specific article would have never made it in the magazine. I actually found it quite interesting and a fun read. The article was well written and about a topic that has quite some relevance. So it wasn't as bad as u make it up to be. But still at least a few notes about how BM and combat-Ex are bad for the community would have been appreciated. | ||
|
Azurues
Malaysia5612 Posts
this need a ton of efforts to do. Totally appreciate it | ||
|
demonik187
United States575 Posts
| ||
|
Jojo131
Brazil1631 Posts
| ||
|
demonik187
United States575 Posts
On April 26 2012 19:33 RolleMcKnolle wrote: I actually found it quite interesting and a fun read. The article was well written and about a topic that has quite some relevance. So it wasn't as bad as u make it up to be. But still at least a few notes about how BM and combat-Ex are bad for the community would have been appreciated. It was a good read and gave some insight into why he does what he does, other than the obvious trying to win. Maybe it will help someone to, and pardon the pun, combat this behavior in the future and not fall into the trap. | ||
| ||
