|
Lorning
Belgica34432 Posts
Poll: Recommend MaNa vs HeRoMaRinE Game 4?★★★- Good game (4) 57% ★★★★- Highly recommended game (3) 43% ★- Do not see this game no matter what (0) 0% ★★- Not recommended unless you have nothing better to do (0) 0% ★★★★★- One of the best games this season (0) 0% 7 total votes Your vote: Recommend MaNa vs HeRoMaRinE Game 4? (Vote): ★- Do not see this game no matter what
(Vote): ★★- Not recommended unless you have nothing better to do
(Vote): ★★★- Good game
(Vote): ★★★★- Highly recommended game
(Vote): ★★★★★- One of the best games this season
|
|
|
Oh my God, Iron Fortress. MaNa is out.
|
|
|
On April 30 2015 03:10 ptbl wrote:
So, Mana goes for an immortal all in and loses an immortal before the fight start. wtf lol. This single mistake might lose Mana his premiership.
even if he didnt man. dunno about that build, heromarine was never in trouble imo
|
|
|
On April 30 2015 03:11 Rain.100 wrote:Show nested quote +On April 30 2015 03:10 ptbl wrote:
So, Mana goes for an immortal all in and loses an immortal before the fight start. wtf lol. This single mistake might lose Mana his premiership. even if he didnt man. dunno about that build, heromarine was never in trouble imo
yeah the attack hit way too late. He usually makes that work, which is why I was quite disappointed by his execution of this all-in.
|
On April 30 2015 03:09 mikumegurine wrote:
some of the immortals were attacking the scvs....
need to focus fire on them maruaders...
I don't think he could have microed his way into winning that fight. Marine had the right units and too many of them.
|
On April 30 2015 03:09 Elentos wrote:Show nested quote +On April 30 2015 03:07 Circumstance wrote:On April 30 2015 03:06 Elentos wrote:On April 30 2015 03:05 Circumstance wrote:On April 30 2015 03:02 Elentos wrote:On April 30 2015 03:01 Circumstance wrote:On April 30 2015 02:59 Mozdk wrote:On April 30 2015 02:57 Lexender wrote:On April 30 2015 02:55 Mozdk wrote:On April 30 2015 02:51 Circumstance wrote:
[quote]
Of course Holland is a country, which happens to also be known as The Netherlands. You are wrong. Holland is a region. Ask anyone from The Netherlands. It's a PART of it. And saying Holland when you mean the whole thing, is considered quite ignorant. Isn't that like saying United Kingdom and England? Where both are right altough one its just a part of the other? Not at all the same. England is a country. Holland is not. It's a region. Is like saying southern England a actually meaning the whole thing. England is NOT a country. The United Kingdom is a country. Oh rly? Tell me, who represents England in the UN? Since when does that determine what constitues a country? You are an idiot. If you don't have political autonomy, you are not a country, you are a region. England may politically dominate the UK, but it is not the UK in its entirety. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Country
Would you look at that? "Always go for the broad definition" Wikipedia says that the term "country" CAN be used to refer specifically to sovereign states! They distinguish in the matter of the UK. I did not. It's entirely reasonable to say that England is not a country due to its lack of sovereignty, and I concede that it's equally reasonable to dispute it.
|
IF is drop's paradise. It's impossible to defend as P. If MaNa doesn't make something sneaky work on 2 bases, I'll consider him dead.
|
On April 30 2015 03:11 Ej_ wrote:
10gate him, son
This is the 2nd time they play each other in Challenger and the 2nd time it goes to game 5. 10 times the player, you say?
|
On April 30 2015 03:13 Circumstance wrote:Show nested quote +On April 30 2015 03:09 Elentos wrote:On April 30 2015 03:07 Circumstance wrote:On April 30 2015 03:06 Elentos wrote:On April 30 2015 03:05 Circumstance wrote:On April 30 2015 03:02 Elentos wrote:On April 30 2015 03:01 Circumstance wrote:On April 30 2015 02:59 Mozdk wrote:On April 30 2015 02:57 Lexender wrote:On April 30 2015 02:55 Mozdk wrote:
[quote]
You are wrong. Holland is a region. Ask anyone from The Netherlands. It's a PART of it. And saying Holland when you mean the whole thing, is considered quite ignorant. Isn't that like saying United Kingdom and England? Where both are right altough one its just a part of the other? Not at all the same. England is a country. Holland is not. It's a region. Is like saying southern England a actually meaning the whole thing. England is NOT a country. The United Kingdom is a country. Oh rly? Tell me, who represents England in the UN? Since when does that determine what constitues a country? You are an idiot. If you don't have political autonomy, you are not a country, you are a region. England may politically dominate the UK, but it is not the UK in its entirety. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Country Would you look at that? "Always go for the broad definition" Wikipedia says that the term "country" CAN be used to refer to.sovereign states! They distinguish in the matter of the UK. I did not. It's entirely reasonable to say that England is not a country due to its lack of sovereignty, and I concede that it's equally reasonable to dispute it.
It's not a matter of opinion, it's factually a country. I don't even know what your problem is.
|
On April 30 2015 03:14 Elentos wrote:Show nested quote +On April 30 2015 03:13 Circumstance wrote:On April 30 2015 03:09 Elentos wrote:On April 30 2015 03:07 Circumstance wrote:On April 30 2015 03:06 Elentos wrote:On April 30 2015 03:05 Circumstance wrote:On April 30 2015 03:02 Elentos wrote:On April 30 2015 03:01 Circumstance wrote:On April 30 2015 02:59 Mozdk wrote:On April 30 2015 02:57 Lexender wrote:
[quote]
Isn't that like saying United Kingdom and England? Where both are right altough one its just a part of the other? Not at all the same. England is a country. Holland is not. It's a region. Is like saying southern England a actually meaning the whole thing. England is NOT a country. The United Kingdom is a country. Oh rly? Tell me, who represents England in the UN? Since when does that determine what constitues a country? You are an idiot. If you don't have political autonomy, you are not a country, you are a region. England may politically dominate the UK, but it is not the UK in its entirety. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Country Would you look at that? "Always go for the broad definition" Wikipedia says that the term "country" CAN be used to refer to.sovereign states! They distinguish in the matter of the UK. I did not. It's entirely reasonable to say that England is not a country due to its lack of sovereignty, and I concede that it's equally reasonable to dispute it. It's not a matter of opinion, it's factually a country. I don't even know what your problem is.
My problem is that TL is calling me an idiot for using different definitions than them.
|
On April 30 2015 03:13 Elentos wrote:This is the 2nd time they play each other in Challenger and the 2nd time it goes to game 5. 10 times the player, you say?
literally 10x the player
|
On April 30 2015 03:13 Circumstance wrote:Show nested quote +On April 30 2015 03:09 Elentos wrote:On April 30 2015 03:07 Circumstance wrote:On April 30 2015 03:06 Elentos wrote:On April 30 2015 03:05 Circumstance wrote:On April 30 2015 03:02 Elentos wrote:On April 30 2015 03:01 Circumstance wrote:On April 30 2015 02:59 Mozdk wrote:On April 30 2015 02:57 Lexender wrote:On April 30 2015 02:55 Mozdk wrote:
[quote]
You are wrong. Holland is a region. Ask anyone from The Netherlands. It's a PART of it. And saying Holland when you mean the whole thing, is considered quite ignorant. Isn't that like saying United Kingdom and England? Where both are right altough one its just a part of the other? Not at all the same. England is a country. Holland is not. It's a region. Is like saying southern England a actually meaning the whole thing. England is NOT a country. The United Kingdom is a country. Oh rly? Tell me, who represents England in the UN? Since when does that determine what constitues a country? You are an idiot. If you don't have political autonomy, you are not a country, you are a region. England may politically dominate the UK, but it is not the UK in its entirety. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Country Would you look at that? "Always go for the broad definition" Wikipedia says that the term "country" CAN be used to refer specifically to sovereign states! They distinguish in the matter of the UK. I did not. It's entirely reasonable to say that England is not a country due to its lack of sovereignty, and I concede that it's equally reasonable to dispute it.
You need to stop arguying against fact. It's an embarrassment.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Countries_of_the_United_Kingdom
|
He will probably figure it out by the amount of marines
|
4 players map make scouting such a coinflip. I hate them.
|
That horrible feeling when you scout last on a 4 player map
|
Well, I hate to get involved, but Circumstance has a point.
|
On April 30 2015 03:15 Circumstance wrote:Show nested quote +On April 30 2015 03:14 Elentos wrote:On April 30 2015 03:13 Circumstance wrote:On April 30 2015 03:09 Elentos wrote:On April 30 2015 03:07 Circumstance wrote:On April 30 2015 03:06 Elentos wrote:On April 30 2015 03:05 Circumstance wrote:On April 30 2015 03:02 Elentos wrote:On April 30 2015 03:01 Circumstance wrote:On April 30 2015 02:59 Mozdk wrote:
[quote]
Not at all the same. England is a country. Holland is not. It's a region. Is like saying southern England a actually meaning the whole thing. England is NOT a country. The United Kingdom is a country. Oh rly? Tell me, who represents England in the UN? Since when does that determine what constitues a country? You are an idiot. If you don't have political autonomy, you are not a country, you are a region. England may politically dominate the UK, but it is not the UK in its entirety. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Country Would you look at that? "Always go for the broad definition" Wikipedia says that the term "country" CAN be used to refer to.sovereign states! They distinguish in the matter of the UK. I did not. It's entirely reasonable to say that England is not a country due to its lack of sovereignty, and I concede that it's equally reasonable to dispute it. It's not a matter of opinion, it's factually a country. I don't even know what your problem is. My problem is that TL is calling me an idiot for using different definitions than them.
you are being called an idiot because you think you can have your own definition of a word
|
|
|
|
|
|
EPT
