| Forum Index > StarCraft 2 Tournaments |
|
brickrd
United States4894 Posts
On September 20 2014 22:12 Wasaru wrote: Really don't see her taking a series from anyone today. By far the weakest player here. there is no reasonable argument that scarlett is "by far weaker than polt" and it wouldnt surprise any attentive fan if she grabbed a series but yea sure i agree shes the weakest seed | ||
The_Templar
your Country52797 Posts
On September 20 2014 22:12 Wasaru wrote: Really don't see her taking a series from anyone today. By far the weakest player here. I agree. Scarlett has no chance this tournament. Go sOs! | ||
Jer99
Canada8159 Posts
On September 20 2014 22:26 The_Templar wrote: I agree. Scarlett has no chance this tournament. Go sOs! going for the shoutout again i see? | ||
|
Wasaru
United States91 Posts
On September 20 2014 22:23 brickrd wrote: there is no reasonable argument that scarlett is "by far weaker than polt" and it wouldnt surprise any attentive fan if she grabbed a series but yea sure i agree shes the weakest seed She beat him at Red Bull pre patch, but even shortly after she lost to him at MLG. Since the patch, she has lost to heromarine, bunny, heart, and flash. | ||
|
The_Templar
your Country52797 Posts
If I was I would have said it would be awful if she won. | ||
|
AWalker9
United Kingdom7229 Posts
| ||
|
Lorning
Belgica34432 Posts
| ||
|
The_Templar
your Country52797 Posts
On September 20 2014 22:49 Lorning wrote: HYPE CITY Washington is, apparently, a hype city. Unfortunately, I'm going to miss a lot of day one, but will probably make the day 2 thread  | ||
|
DarkPlasmaBall
United States45201 Posts
| ||
|
wrier
Canada291 Posts
I don't think Trap will do it though. I wouldn't mind seeing a rematch of him vs Scarlett from their series from MLG, that game 3 (?) on Frost was pretty interesting. | ||
Darkhorse
United States23455 Posts
![[image loading]](http://i.imgur.com/yqTqmT4.png) I dunno who did the liquipedia but this doesn't make that much sense. Scarlett/DRG both "qualified" by winning events just like Polt/Bomber/Trap/Parting/sOs (runner up) so they should be under invite as well right? Cure did make it through the online qualifier so I guess he should be under qualified rather than invited? Although there is also this: ![[image loading]](http://i.imgur.com/8ntfQOf.png) | ||
|
Lorning
Belgica34432 Posts
On September 20 2014 22:58 Darkhorse wrote: + Show Spoiler + I dunno who did the liquipedia but this doesn't make that much sense. Scarlett/DRG both "qualified" by winning events just like Polt/Bomber/Trap/Parting/sOs (runner up) so they should be under invite as well right? Cure did make it through the online qualifier so I guess he should be under qualified rather than invited? Although there is also this: + Show Spoiler + Take me down to the Hype City Where the rules don't matter And the WCS point distribution is silly | ||
|
Musicus
Germany23576 Posts
| ||
|
Dodgin
Canada39254 Posts
| ||
|
Die4Ever
United States17723 Posts
On September 20 2014 22:58 Darkhorse wrote: I dunno who did the liquipedia but this doesn't make that much sense. Scarlett/DRG both "qualified" by winning events just like Polt/Bomber/Trap/Parting/sOs (runner up) so they should be under invite as well right? Cure did make it through the online qualifier so I guess he should be under qualified rather than invited? Although there is also this: the difference is in how WCS treats it. You don't get WCS points if you lose the first round and you were invited/seeded, but if you "qualified" then that's ok. The thing that makes the difference is that the qualifier cannot give WCS points, cause if it does then that's double dipping, it's basically increasing the number of WCS points you give to the winner automatically. | ||
|
Musicus
Germany23576 Posts
| ||
|
Lorning
Belgica34432 Posts
On September 20 2014 23:11 Musicus wrote: https://twitter.com/smixity/status/513329427036786688 Now if only he groups were released | ||
|
wrier
Canada291 Posts
| ||
Yhamm
France7248 Posts
On September 20 2014 22:58 Darkhorse wrote: I dunno who did the liquipedia but this doesn't make that much sense. Scarlett/DRG both "qualified" by winning events just like Polt/Bomber/Trap/Parting/sOs (runner up) so they should be under invite as well right? Cure did make it through the online qualifier so I guess he should be under qualified rather than invited? Although there is also this: Scarlett, DRG & Cure won events that are considered as qualifiers for WCS points which is not the case for the five other players about the 2nd picture, it is an omission | ||
|
Die4Ever
United States17723 Posts
haha typical red bull | ||
| ||
StarCraft 2 StarCraft: Brood War Britney Dota 2  20255EffOrt  424Shuttle 223Dewaltoss 113Larva 61Killer 46Rock 37910  26scan(afreeca) 23Counter-Strike Other Games Grubby5317 FrodaN3269 Liquid`RaSZi2102 Beastyqt901 Harstem460 Liquid`Hasu418 mouzStarbuck399 B2W.Neo224 ArmadaUGS187 XaKoH  149KnowMe140 QueenE94 TKL  83Mlord5 |
|
SOOP
SHIN vs GuMiho
Cure vs Creator
The PondCast
Wardi Open
Big Gabe XPERIONCRAFT
AI Arena Tournament
Sparkling Tuna Cup
WardiTV Invitational
IPSL
DragOn vs Sziky
Replay Cast
Wardi Open
[ Show More ] |
|
|
EPT
