EPT[NASL] Day 8-2 - Page 36
| Forum Index > StarCraft 2 Tournaments |
|
Grimwold
Finland42 Posts
| ||
|
Exarl25
1887 Posts
| ||
|
Redox
Germany24794 Posts
On June 03 2011 12:22 Clog wrote: Holy shit incontrol just threw away 3 sentries that were like full energy Actually it was 5 with full energy. :D | ||
|
Severedevil
United States4830 Posts
On June 03 2011 12:19 DeltruS wrote: Why don't protoss get a fast +1 air when going pheonix? Pheonixes do 2 fast attack volleys at 5 damage a piece, and overlords have 1 armor. I have no idea. It's incredibly strong - especially against queens. If you're going to open 1 Stargate air and get more than 4 air units, you should absolutely get +1 Air Weapons. | ||
|
bobwhiz
United States725 Posts
| ||
|
Heavenly
2172 Posts
| ||
|
Xxavi
United States1248 Posts
| ||
|
FrodaN
754 Posts
 | ||
|
forgottendreams
United States1771 Posts
| ||
|
Azarkon
United States21060 Posts
| ||
|
Hollis
United States505 Posts
On June 03 2011 12:21 Seditary wrote: lol Gretorp straight out saying TT1 is ridiculously stupid then fumbles all over himself saying how much he loves him. Yeah this was great, LOL. We love you Grederp! Neva change! | ||
|
IPA
United States3206 Posts
| ||
|
gh0un
601 Posts
On June 03 2011 12:22 IPA wrote: "Nice forcefields" as he fails to catch a single unit. Sick casting. Its like, everytime forcefields are thrown down they call "nice forcefields", no matter how good or bad they actually were. Its as if they dont have any other way of announcing that forcefields were thrown down, therefore they stick with "nice forcefields". | ||
|
Dommk
Australia4865 Posts
On June 03 2011 12:24 Severedevil wrote: I have no idea. It's incredibly strong - especially against queens. If you're going to open 1 Stargate air and get more than 4 air units, you should absolutely get +1 Air Weapons. Corrupter Ling Bane beats it pretty handily :S You can't handle a baneling/Ling army without a good ground army, on maps like Meta it would be so difficult to take your third against a Tsunami of Ling/Banes going mass Phoenix Its like, everytime forcefields are thrown down they call "nice forcefields", no matter how good or bad they actually were. Its as if they dont have any other way of announcing that forcefields were thrown down, therefore they stick with "nice forcefields". It is the same with EMP's and Banelings...someone else said it another Live report thread, they jut do it for effect. Really great forcefields tend to get a much more excited reaction | ||
|
sc14s
United States5052 Posts
On June 03 2011 12:24 jazzyjazz wrote: GG!!!!! Third game coming up! July doesn't need the eye of the tiger. He has eye of the panda! he eats pandas for breakfast | ||
Whitewing
United States7483 Posts
On June 03 2011 12:24 Xeris wrote: First: I'm a protoss player I also strongly believe archons are too strong. I really think increasing build time / making them unable to move/be pushed while morphing would help a little bit. I.E. in those games, the archons morphed faster than qxc could kill them T_TYou are certainly entitled to your opinion, I just feel that a game cast is not the right forum for balance discussion, or for suggesting nerfs to units. It seemed to cheapen the cast a bit and made it less interesting. | ||
|
Vimsey
United Kingdom2235 Posts
On June 03 2011 12:24 Xeris wrote: First: I'm a protoss player I also strongly believe archons are too strong. I really think increasing build time / making them unable to move/be pushed while morphing would help a little bit. I.E. in those games, the archons morphed faster than qxc could kill them T_TGrand master level protoss? | ||
|
ForeverSleep
Canada920 Posts
| ||
Shellshock
United States97274 Posts
| ||
|
jazzyjazz
941 Posts
On June 03 2011 12:24 Heavenly wrote: Lol, that was fully Incontrol messing up the early game ridiculously hard, his nexus was over a minute late. more overrating for julyzerg pls. Julyzerg must be top 5 zerg in the world =P To be fair, july messed up game one pretty hard, does that make incontrol overrated? They're both good players, enjoy the game. | ||
| ||
