You are certainly having fun^^. Not that i'm complaining about it!
[TSL] Ro16 Day 3 - Page 55
Forum Index > StarCraft 2 Tournaments |
Kuzmorgo
Hungary1058 Posts
You are certainly having fun^^. Not that i'm complaining about it! | ||
BadWithNames
United States441 Posts
| ||
pHelix Equilibria
United States1134 Posts
From SCV rushes to 3x Bunker Rushes to Nukes? Yes. | ||
Beyonder
Netherlands15103 Posts
| ||
Thor-axe the Impaler
United States331 Posts
On April 17 2011 03:53 Telcontar wrote: I love drugged up Day9. Why is he drugged up and where did you hear that? On April 17 2011 03:54 Kuzmorgo wrote: Oh-oh, no offence Day9, but are you drunk? You are certainly having fun^^. Not that i'm complaining about it! Guys, can't Day9 have fun without being either inebriated or effected by some crazy substance? | ||
HwangjaeTerran
Finland5967 Posts
But attacking on that map is so very slow. Eventhough he smashed one army Sen had plenty of time to rebuild over and over again. | ||
KiNGxXx
7928 Posts
On April 17 2011 03:52 KiNGxXx wrote: Poll: Recommend Sen vs BoxeR (Game 2)? Yes (178) If you have time (9) No (5) 192 total votes Your vote: Recommend Sen vs BoxeR (Game 2)? | ||
Spitmode
Germany1510 Posts
idd. very nice | ||
whiterabbit
2675 Posts
You truly are awesome! | ||
maybenexttime
Poland5363 Posts
On April 17 2011 03:54 Rhokdar wrote: Boxer's macro is definitely his Achilles Heel As it was in BW. | ||
MoonBear
Straight outta Johto18973 Posts
FnaticMSI.Sen vs SlayerS_BoxeR Match 1 Summary Match 2 Summary | ||
DrunkenTemplar
Australia647 Posts
| ||
zyglrox
United States1168 Posts
On April 17 2011 03:54 Thor-axe the Impaler wrote: Why is he drugged up and where did you hear that? O_o | ||
Roggay
Switzerland6320 Posts
| ||
Caphe
Vietnam10817 Posts
| ||
Tyree
1508 Posts
Day9san! | ||
TheAwesomeAll
Netherlands1609 Posts
| ||
Crebstar
United States151 Posts
Go Boxer!! | ||
SmoKim
Denmark10301 Posts
seriously dude, made probs for always doing Live Reports, you are a hero =) | ||
nam nam
Sweden4672 Posts
On April 17 2011 03:40 Romance_us wrote: If you don't give any details whatsoever obviously I'm going to assume you aren't watching LQ. Wasn't being a smartass, but my apologies? Jesus, you people are so fucking aggressive on this forum. Especially the accounts created less than a year ago I've noticed Then you could simply ask if I'm using the LQ stream instead of the condescending way of responding you used. And I fail to see how my post was particular aggressive. I wasn't asking for help and you basically responding with 1) You are stupid enough not to use the LQ stream 2) The ignorant opinion that if the stream works for you, it must work for the rest of the world. I think that warrants being called a smartass. If you didn't mean for it to come out like that, I apologize, but maybe you should be a little more careful how you present your advices if you don't like people responding in kind. And I'm willing to bet I've been apart of this community just as long as you. But good job with that backhand insult... I don't see how being that condescending and judgemental is better than being aggressive (by your definition). | ||
| ||