[NASL] Day 1-3 - Page 26
Forum Index > StarCraft 2 Tournaments |
1Eris1
United States5797 Posts
| ||
ImmortalTofu
United States1254 Posts
| ||
FLuE
United States1012 Posts
Even at Disney the Pirates of the Caribbean broke down constantly at first right? I feel like inControl at this point just spends his life trying to justify and rationalize things that he has no control over, which is ironic given his name. | ||
arb
Noobville17920 Posts
On April 15 2011 10:19 Mastermind wrote: Ya, isnt that one of the advantages of pre-recording? They would have edited it out and the forum would have been filled with bitching about Moonglade getting a free win or something stupid Im glad they left it in | ||
cnas
Sweden640 Posts
Slush: 1 awesomeness point Bliz: fuck you Also: | ||
Jman5
United States745 Posts
On April 15 2011 10:19 Mastermind wrote: Ya, isnt that one of the advantages of pre-recording? I think they did edit a lot of the waiting. Would you rather the game suddenly goes black and the next game starts up? | ||
Clicker
United States1012 Posts
On April 15 2011 10:20 Belegurth wrote: for 1000th time, its live played + live commentated but pre-recorded. This needs to be bolded at the top of the LR threads for the first 2 weeks unfortunately ;p | ||
monkey5476
United States133 Posts
This. a LAN feature would easily improve connection speed whether it be 5ft away or thousands of miles. | ||
SolonTLG
United States299 Posts
| ||
Mephiztopheles1
1124 Posts
On April 15 2011 10:20 TheTenthDoc wrote: Because LAN would TOTALLY help when you have an international tourney with players from all over that are not in a local area. You obviously didn't play Warcraft 3, did you? LAN helps so much in those situations ![]() | ||
Mastermind
Canada7096 Posts
| ||
Majynx
United States1431 Posts
| ||
Dyspathy
United States83 Posts
Some sort of direct connection feature would at least take the questionableness of battle.net out of the equation, though. Its frustrating, they even have drops in local competitions like GSL! | ||
benjammin
United States2728 Posts
| ||
LoliKuma
United States237 Posts
| ||
DrivE
United States2554 Posts
| ||
![]()
bkrow
Australia8532 Posts
Edit what out? They lagged out. There was no regame - what is there to edit out? At least we know what happened now. | ||
ArghUScaredMe
United States712 Posts
On April 15 2011 10:20 Jyvblamo wrote: Slush learned his lesson after that incident in Beta with Artosis ![]() Elaborate on this E-Drama please. What happened? | ||
Goibon
New Zealand8185 Posts
hi5 to slush COME ON SLUSH (i don't like moonglade because he's australian </racism>) | ||
red_
United States8474 Posts
On April 15 2011 10:19 Parnage wrote: On one hand I'd in the future edit this out but conversely I'd love to point out that it says "hey uhhh lan and stuff" and luckly moonglade had it in the bag anyway. They didn't edit it out because Slush elected to concede the game; at most they would've edited out the 15 seconds they waited to see if they might resync to bnet, but then they dropped and explained how the game was going to be given to Moonglade etc etc. Makes plenty of sense. | ||
| ||