|
On October 31 2016 05:33 Shapelog wrote:
Also please pair me up with hina Cakepie :D!
I make no promises. For that, you'll need to pray to RNG. Or better yet, pray to Hina.
On October 31 2016 09:19 ExO_ wrote:
/in can I play? I don't think I'm really a newbie anymore
Yeah I'll put you down as /in:Open into a non-newbie slot.
On October 31 2016 09:28 ExO_ wrote:
There's a distinct lack of Marisa/Patchy/Alice here hmnmm
No MariAliPatchy for you.
I was hoping to be lazier with flavor this time if no one actually cared, but looks like I actually have to put in some effort. XÞ
No huge chunks of narrative though, I swore never to do that again after last time.
Waiting on:
- One more player. I'm willing to open the newbie slot to non-newbies in the interest of getting things moving.
- One more coach (maybe two) would be nice, for 1-to-1 coaches to newbies ratio
- One more cohost needed to cover for beentheredonethat's planned absence.
|
United Kingdom30774 Posts
|
On October 31 2016 09:24 NeverUnlucky wrote:
Sure. c: One more /in.
This is what is going to happen this game:
1. I will roll town.
2. Game starts; unoriginal players'll say "First confirmed town!"
3. One town will have a weird or even scummy entry.
4. Calix will tunnel said player. NeverUnlucky will have a good read on Calix based on the tunnel.
5. Said town will claim that the intent behind his entry was to stir up conversation.
6. Everyone will mock him and some will town-read him.
7. Active players’ll shitpost, lurkers’ll lurk.
8. One player will case another player who’ll become the main wagon, but the case is weak, thus :
9. People will initiate a CFD at EoD, and a town will die.
You clearly have an agenda.
FoS: NeverUnlucky
|
I'm familiar with Matrix6, I don't really need a coach for mechanics unless there is a notable difference in implementation between this site and MS.
|
On October 31 2016 18:55 Foreman wrote:
I don't really need a coach for mechanics
Coaches are good for much more than just mechanics!
|
On October 31 2016 20:49 cakepie wrote:Show nested quote +On October 31 2016 18:55 Foreman wrote:
I don't really need a coach for mechanics Coaches are good for much more than just mechanics!
Okay. 
|
On October 31 2016 18:50 Foreman wrote:Show nested quote +On October 31 2016 09:24 NeverUnlucky wrote:
Sure. c: One more /in.
This is what is going to happen this game:
1. I will roll town.
2. Game starts; unoriginal players'll say "First confirmed town!"
3. One town will have a weird or even scummy entry.
4. Calix will tunnel said player. NeverUnlucky will have a good read on Calix based on the tunnel.
5. Said town will claim that the intent behind his entry was to stir up conversation.
6. Everyone will mock him and some will town-read him.
7. Active players’ll shitpost, lurkers’ll lurk.
8. One player will case another player who’ll become the main wagon, but the case is weak, thus :
9. People will initiate a CFD at EoD, and a town will die.
You clearly have an agenda. FoS: NeverUnlucky
Actually, all he has done, is back himself in a corner with you if he is scum. 
See number 4 states that he will have a good read on you, in the case that you tunnel. If no such read was to come, or a crappy one, then he would look less credible. Perhaps, you could argue that 6 could set up a possible scum read for him (if people keep scum reading him) but that is weak.
He also is forced in this to read the "One town with a weird entry" as town, due to wording. Which is bad for scum, as it knocks off a ML for day 1 at least.
In fact, the only way this benefits scum is if the person to make the weird entry is scum buddies, which is a high risk, low reward (a weak reason to TR at most) move IMO
The rest of it is unpredictable and useless, since it revolves on other players doing it.
Sorry, regaining my mafia mindset.
EDIT: He also would have to point out the case is weak too due to #8 and make reads accordly.
|
On October 31 2016 21:33 Shapelog wrote:Show nested quote +On October 31 2016 18:50 Foreman wrote:On October 31 2016 09:24 NeverUnlucky wrote:
Sure. c: One more /in.
This is what is going to happen this game:
1. I will roll town.
2. Game starts; unoriginal players'll say "First confirmed town!"
3. One town will have a weird or even scummy entry.
4. Calix will tunnel said player. NeverUnlucky will have a good read on Calix based on the tunnel.
5. Said town will claim that the intent behind his entry was to stir up conversation.
6. Everyone will mock him and some will town-read him.
7. Active players’ll shitpost, lurkers’ll lurk.
8. One player will case another player who’ll become the main wagon, but the case is weak, thus :
9. People will initiate a CFD at EoD, and a town will die.
You clearly have an agenda. FoS: NeverUnlucky Actually, all he has done, is back himself in a corner with you if he is scum. See number 4 states that he will have a good read on you, in the case that you tunnel. If no such read was to come, or a crappy one, then he would look less credible. Perhaps, you could argue that 6 could set up a possible scum read for him (if people keep scum reading him) but that is weak. He also is forced in this to read the "One town with a weird entry" as town, due to wording. Which is bad for scum, as it knocks off a ML for day 1 at least. In fact, the only way this benefits scum is if the person to make the weird entry is scum buddies, which is a high risk, low reward (a weak reason to TR at most) move IMO The rest of it is unpredictable and useless, since it revolves on other players doing it. Sorry, regaining my mafia mindset. EDIT: He also would have to point out the case is weak too due to #8 and make reads accordly.
When NU wrote in #4 about "good read" all he meant was "start a 20 page shouting duel with Calix, with both calling each other names, so that all other players get dazed and just want to hide from the thread".
Which in the end always benefits scum. Having them in the same game seems to always benefit scum, no matter which roles they roll. #prayforrollingscum #scumOP
The problem with that meta is, that they both have to hold this up, as this is their typical townie meta. If they were not yelling at each other, this would strongly hint at them being scum.
|
... or, you know, it was just another NU shitpost and the depicted scenario won't concretize because I made that post so people will be wary of what they post.
It's like saying Cali will roll mafmaf because she complained about setups being town favoured.
|
On October 31 2016 22:01 mahrgell wrote:Show nested quote +On October 31 2016 21:33 Shapelog wrote:On October 31 2016 18:50 Foreman wrote:On October 31 2016 09:24 NeverUnlucky wrote:
Sure. c: One more /in.
This is what is going to happen this game:
1. I will roll town.
2. Game starts; unoriginal players'll say "First confirmed town!"
3. One town will have a weird or even scummy entry.
4. Calix will tunnel said player. NeverUnlucky will have a good read on Calix based on the tunnel.
5. Said town will claim that the intent behind his entry was to stir up conversation.
6. Everyone will mock him and some will town-read him.
7. Active players’ll shitpost, lurkers’ll lurk.
8. One player will case another player who’ll become the main wagon, but the case is weak, thus :
9. People will initiate a CFD at EoD, and a town will die.
You clearly have an agenda. FoS: NeverUnlucky Actually, all he has done, is back himself in a corner with you if he is scum. See number 4 states that he will have a good read on you, in the case that you tunnel. If no such read was to come, or a crappy one, then he would look less credible. Perhaps, you could argue that 6 could set up a possible scum read for him (if people keep scum reading him) but that is weak. He also is forced in this to read the "One town with a weird entry" as town, due to wording. Which is bad for scum, as it knocks off a ML for day 1 at least. In fact, the only way this benefits scum is if the person to make the weird entry is scum buddies, which is a high risk, low reward (a weak reason to TR at most) move IMO The rest of it is unpredictable and useless, since it revolves on other players doing it. Sorry, regaining my mafia mindset. EDIT: He also would have to point out the case is weak too due to #8 and make reads accordly. When NU wrote in #4 about "good read" all he meant was "start a 20 page shouting duel with Calix, with both calling each other names, so that all other players get dazed and just want to hide from the thread". Which in the end always benefits scum. Having them in the same game seems to always benefit scum, no matter which roles they roll. #prayforrollingscum #scumOP The problem with that meta is, that they both have to hold this up, as this is their typical townie meta. If they were not yelling at each other, this would strongly hint at them being scum.
How do you know all of this? o.o
|
On October 31 2016 22:43 NeverUnlucky wrote:Show nested quote +On October 31 2016 22:01 mahrgell wrote:On October 31 2016 21:33 Shapelog wrote:On October 31 2016 18:50 Foreman wrote:On October 31 2016 09:24 NeverUnlucky wrote:
Sure. c: One more /in.
This is what is going to happen this game:
1. I will roll town.
2. Game starts; unoriginal players'll say "First confirmed town!"
3. One town will have a weird or even scummy entry.
4. Calix will tunnel said player. NeverUnlucky will have a good read on Calix based on the tunnel.
5. Said town will claim that the intent behind his entry was to stir up conversation.
6. Everyone will mock him and some will town-read him.
7. Active players’ll shitpost, lurkers’ll lurk.
8. One player will case another player who’ll become the main wagon, but the case is weak, thus :
9. People will initiate a CFD at EoD, and a town will die.
You clearly have an agenda. FoS: NeverUnlucky Actually, all he has done, is back himself in a corner with you if he is scum. See number 4 states that he will have a good read on you, in the case that you tunnel. If no such read was to come, or a crappy one, then he would look less credible. Perhaps, you could argue that 6 could set up a possible scum read for him (if people keep scum reading him) but that is weak. He also is forced in this to read the "One town with a weird entry" as town, due to wording. Which is bad for scum, as it knocks off a ML for day 1 at least. In fact, the only way this benefits scum is if the person to make the weird entry is scum buddies, which is a high risk, low reward (a weak reason to TR at most) move IMO The rest of it is unpredictable and useless, since it revolves on other players doing it. Sorry, regaining my mafia mindset. EDIT: He also would have to point out the case is weak too due to #8 and make reads accordly. When NU wrote in #4 about "good read" all he meant was "start a 20 page shouting duel with Calix, with both calling each other names, so that all other players get dazed and just want to hide from the thread". Which in the end always benefits scum. Having them in the same game seems to always benefit scum, no matter which roles they roll. #prayforrollingscum #scumOP The problem with that meta is, that they both have to hold this up, as this is their typical townie meta. If they were not yelling at each other, this would strongly hint at them being scum. How do you know all of this? o.o
You are a legend, Sir.
|
I suspect that mahrgell decided to read previous games in order to get a feel for the players he would be in the game with.
Sadly this probably means that I'm going to be deluged with shitty and inaccurate meta reads
|
Me thinks Margey was following Cruise Trip all along. Only you are tryhard enough to read past games in the pre-game.
Day 1 we sheep or kill margey.
|
I'd like to think that I've learned a few things from CM/ the Newbie game regardless of which alignment I roll this round.
Only you are tryhard enough to read past games in the pre-game.
You overestimate me so.
[insert obligatory pre-game excuse about posting less and in a different fashion here]
|
On October 31 2016 23:44 Calix wrote:
[insert obligatory pre-game excuse about posting less and in a different fashion here]
I'll have one of these too
|
On October 31 2016 22:01 mahrgell wrote:Show nested quote +On October 31 2016 21:33 Shapelog wrote:On October 31 2016 18:50 Foreman wrote:On October 31 2016 09:24 NeverUnlucky wrote:
Sure. c: One more /in.
This is what is going to happen this game:
1. I will roll town.
2. Game starts; unoriginal players'll say "First confirmed town!"
3. One town will have a weird or even scummy entry.
4. Calix will tunnel said player. NeverUnlucky will have a good read on Calix based on the tunnel.
5. Said town will claim that the intent behind his entry was to stir up conversation.
6. Everyone will mock him and some will town-read him.
7. Active players’ll shitpost, lurkers’ll lurk.
8. One player will case another player who’ll become the main wagon, but the case is weak, thus :
9. People will initiate a CFD at EoD, and a town will die.
You clearly have an agenda. FoS: NeverUnlucky Actually, all he has done, is back himself in a corner with you if he is scum. See number 4 states that he will have a good read on you, in the case that you tunnel. If no such read was to come, or a crappy one, then he would look less credible. Perhaps, you could argue that 6 could set up a possible scum read for him (if people keep scum reading him) but that is weak. He also is forced in this to read the "One town with a weird entry" as town, due to wording. Which is bad for scum, as it knocks off a ML for day 1 at least. In fact, the only way this benefits scum is if the person to make the weird entry is scum buddies, which is a high risk, low reward (a weak reason to TR at most) move IMO The rest of it is unpredictable and useless, since it revolves on other players doing it. Sorry, regaining my mafia mindset. EDIT: He also would have to point out the case is weak too due to #8 and make reads accordly. When NU wrote in #4 about "good read" all he meant was "start a 20 page shouting duel with Calix, with both calling each other names, so that all other players get dazed and just want to hide from the thread". Which in the end always benefits scum. Having them in the same game seems to always benefit scum, no matter which roles they roll. #prayforrollingscum #scumOP The problem with that meta is, that they both have to hold this up, as this is their typical townie meta. If they were not yelling at each other, this would strongly hint at them being scum.
Oh yeah I forgot who I was talking about.
It would have to depend then on how he does it, and it is overly obv. that he is faking it (the fight) with Calix then, or them not doing it as you said.
|
On November 01 2016 00:37 Shapelog wrote:Show nested quote +On October 31 2016 22:01 mahrgell wrote:On October 31 2016 21:33 Shapelog wrote:On October 31 2016 18:50 Foreman wrote:On October 31 2016 09:24 NeverUnlucky wrote:
Sure. c: One more /in.
This is what is going to happen this game:
1. I will roll town.
2. Game starts; unoriginal players'll say "First confirmed town!"
3. One town will have a weird or even scummy entry.
4. Calix will tunnel said player. NeverUnlucky will have a good read on Calix based on the tunnel.
5. Said town will claim that the intent behind his entry was to stir up conversation.
6. Everyone will mock him and some will town-read him.
7. Active players’ll shitpost, lurkers’ll lurk.
8. One player will case another player who’ll become the main wagon, but the case is weak, thus :
9. People will initiate a CFD at EoD, and a town will die.
You clearly have an agenda. FoS: NeverUnlucky Actually, all he has done, is back himself in a corner with you if he is scum. See number 4 states that he will have a good read on you, in the case that you tunnel. If no such read was to come, or a crappy one, then he would look less credible. Perhaps, you could argue that 6 could set up a possible scum read for him (if people keep scum reading him) but that is weak. He also is forced in this to read the "One town with a weird entry" as town, due to wording. Which is bad for scum, as it knocks off a ML for day 1 at least. In fact, the only way this benefits scum is if the person to make the weird entry is scum buddies, which is a high risk, low reward (a weak reason to TR at most) move IMO The rest of it is unpredictable and useless, since it revolves on other players doing it. Sorry, regaining my mafia mindset. EDIT: He also would have to point out the case is weak too due to #8 and make reads accordly. When NU wrote in #4 about "good read" all he meant was "start a 20 page shouting duel with Calix, with both calling each other names, so that all other players get dazed and just want to hide from the thread". Which in the end always benefits scum. Having them in the same game seems to always benefit scum, no matter which roles they roll. #prayforrollingscum #scumOP The problem with that meta is, that they both have to hold this up, as this is their typical townie meta. If they were not yelling at each other, this would strongly hint at them being scum. Oh yeah I forgot who I was talking about. It would have to depend then on how he does it, and it is overly obv. that he is faking it (the fight) with Calix then, or them not doing it as you said.
So much incentive to not do it this game 
|
On November 01 2016 00:42 Calix wrote:Show nested quote +On November 01 2016 00:37 Shapelog wrote:On October 31 2016 22:01 mahrgell wrote:On October 31 2016 21:33 Shapelog wrote:On October 31 2016 18:50 Foreman wrote:On October 31 2016 09:24 NeverUnlucky wrote:
Sure. c: One more /in.
This is what is going to happen this game:
1. I will roll town.
2. Game starts; unoriginal players'll say "First confirmed town!"
3. One town will have a weird or even scummy entry.
4. Calix will tunnel said player. NeverUnlucky will have a good read on Calix based on the tunnel.
5. Said town will claim that the intent behind his entry was to stir up conversation.
6. Everyone will mock him and some will town-read him.
7. Active players’ll shitpost, lurkers’ll lurk.
8. One player will case another player who’ll become the main wagon, but the case is weak, thus :
9. People will initiate a CFD at EoD, and a town will die.
You clearly have an agenda. FoS: NeverUnlucky Actually, all he has done, is back himself in a corner with you if he is scum. See number 4 states that he will have a good read on you, in the case that you tunnel. If no such read was to come, or a crappy one, then he would look less credible. Perhaps, you could argue that 6 could set up a possible scum read for him (if people keep scum reading him) but that is weak. He also is forced in this to read the "One town with a weird entry" as town, due to wording. Which is bad for scum, as it knocks off a ML for day 1 at least. In fact, the only way this benefits scum is if the person to make the weird entry is scum buddies, which is a high risk, low reward (a weak reason to TR at most) move IMO The rest of it is unpredictable and useless, since it revolves on other players doing it. Sorry, regaining my mafia mindset. EDIT: He also would have to point out the case is weak too due to #8 and make reads accordly. When NU wrote in #4 about "good read" all he meant was "start a 20 page shouting duel with Calix, with both calling each other names, so that all other players get dazed and just want to hide from the thread". Which in the end always benefits scum. Having them in the same game seems to always benefit scum, no matter which roles they roll. #prayforrollingscum #scumOP The problem with that meta is, that they both have to hold this up, as this is their typical townie meta. If they were not yelling at each other, this would strongly hint at them being scum. Oh yeah I forgot who I was talking about. It would have to depend then on how he does it, and it is overly obv. that he is faking it (the fight) with Calix then, or them not doing it as you said. So much incentive to not do it this game
Agreed. Let's have a truce this game.
(unless you roll mafia)
|
Calix and NU are a wonderful couple of diametral opposites:
On October 31 2016 23:25 Calix wrote:
I suspect that mahrgell decided to read previous games in order to get a feel for the players he would be in the game with.
Sadly this probably means that I'm going to be deluged with shitty and inaccurate meta reads
First line (suspection) completely wrong, but second line (let's call it conclusion) completely is a true/good/honest statement.
On October 31 2016 23:41 NeverUnlucky wrote:
Me thinks Margey was following Cruise Trip all along. Only you are tryhard enough to read past games in the pre-game.
Day 1 we sheep or kill margey.
First line (suspection) correct, but second line (conclusion) terrible!
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
EPT
