|
On April 28 2015 21:23 marvellosity wrote:Show nested quote +On April 28 2015 21:20 indignant wrote:On April 28 2015 21:11 marvellosity wrote:
Pretty much. I may have missed a couple of pages somewhere but not much Are you part of the gym? Don't think so.
You would know if you were. Ok.
|
On April 28 2015 22:23 LightningStrike wrote:Show nested quote +On April 28 2015 22:13 marvellosity wrote:
LS, why did you have nothing to say about what HF was talking about with sandroba?
He pushed his point *a lot* so it's not like you could have missed it?
Also I mean yes I saw that post in your filter, but it was a long time before all the serious discussion happened around sand in the last several hours of the day I checked Sandroba's filter and others said Sandroba is just a bad player when the serious discussion was going around which is how I felt about him myself. I think it kinda reminds me of FF's case on me in Guardians Day 1 when that case can be used in every game I had played.
This is also something that irks me about Obi. He just pushed the thought that sandroba is always terrible as town. Does he not know better or what's up with that?
|
On April 28 2015 22:34 marvellosity wrote:Show nested quote +On April 28 2015 22:33 LightningStrike wrote:On April 28 2015 22:30 marvellosity wrote:On April 28 2015 22:29 LightningStrike wrote:On April 28 2015 22:26 marvellosity wrote:On April 28 2015 22:23 LightningStrike wrote:On April 28 2015 22:13 marvellosity wrote:
LS, why did you have nothing to say about what HF was talking about with sandroba?
He pushed his point *a lot* so it's not like you could have missed it?
Also I mean yes I saw that post in your filter, but it was a long time before all the serious discussion happened around sand in the last several hours of the day I checked Sandroba's filter and others said Sandroba is just a bad player when the serious discussion was going around which is how I felt about him myself. I think it kinda reminds me of FF's case on me in Guardians Day 1 when that case can be used in every game I had played. So when Holyflare made the point that sandroba couldn't possibly think HF's reads were fabricated because he'd only just come back to the thread, what did you think? I remember Sandroba said he was reading the thread and thought he just being genuine about it myself when he saw the list post by HF I mean he coulda been afk while were all discussing things to form reads. ugh. What? ugh = your reasoning is terrible but I am not sure what that means for your alignment right now
What's your current stance on the swamp inhabitant? Still town?
I kinda think so even though this hardcore tunnel is a little disturbing.
|
On April 28 2015 22:43 LightningStrike wrote:Show nested quote +On April 28 2015 22:39 indignant wrote:On April 28 2015 22:34 marvellosity wrote:On April 28 2015 22:33 LightningStrike wrote:On April 28 2015 22:30 marvellosity wrote:On April 28 2015 22:29 LightningStrike wrote:On April 28 2015 22:26 marvellosity wrote:On April 28 2015 22:23 LightningStrike wrote:On April 28 2015 22:13 marvellosity wrote:
LS, why did you have nothing to say about what HF was talking about with sandroba?
He pushed his point *a lot* so it's not like you could have missed it?
Also I mean yes I saw that post in your filter, but it was a long time before all the serious discussion happened around sand in the last several hours of the day I checked Sandroba's filter and others said Sandroba is just a bad player when the serious discussion was going around which is how I felt about him myself. I think it kinda reminds me of FF's case on me in Guardians Day 1 when that case can be used in every game I had played. So when Holyflare made the point that sandroba couldn't possibly think HF's reads were fabricated because he'd only just come back to the thread, what did you think? I remember Sandroba said he was reading the thread and thought he just being genuine about it myself when he saw the list post by HF I mean he coulda been afk while were all discussing things to form reads. ugh. What? ugh = your reasoning is terrible but I am not sure what that means for your alignment right now What's your current stance on the swamp inhabitant? Still town? I kinda think so even though this hardcore tunnel is a little disturbing. But I am the Town Puppy :O Just been playing more fetch than anything for a bit and now in serious mode: ![[image loading]](http://www.2ndhandbarking.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/06/dogbarking.jpg) I here all day until I go watch a baseball game feel free to ask me anything.
Puppies are not the typical swamp inhabitants I would say.
|
On April 28 2015 22:48 LightningStrike wrote:Show nested quote +On April 28 2015 22:47 marvellosity wrote:On April 28 2015 22:46 Xatalos wrote:
If we assume that yamato is town (kind of likely), then Damdred looks a decent amount better for his critical vote on sandroba. thought experiment: what were Damdred's options? Sandroba or Yamato were his only options but he sheeped his townreads (Shining and HF).
The townread/sheeping on shining is the thing that's weird about it. I also remembered that weneed to keep in mind that there is 3p in this game when evaluating wagons.
|
On April 28 2015 22:49 marvellosity wrote:Show nested quote +On April 26 2015 20:44 indignant wrote:On April 26 2015 11:31 Breshke wrote:On April 26 2015 07:03 sandroba wrote:
Hello guys. I'm happy to have finally rolled town. Looks to me we have ~ 1 and a half lynches per complete cycle based on my own HP. Seems sweet and I expect mafia/3rd party to have some powerful roles based on that. Im really intrested how you figured it is 1 and a half lynches per complete cycle based on your hp and stuff since the first cycle there is no fight promoter and the fight only causes 5 dmg to each participant. Based on the information in the OP at all and my own HP I would think that someone would have to participate in multiple fights to be killed by this mechanic add that on with no fight first day cycle just don't get how you got to 1.5 lynches per day. This being said I think I heard your very good with mechanics, where did I read this I think marv said it? So i assume you are right I just don't see how.Also hi everyone This post feels off. The bolded paragraph in particular seems like Breshke knows that sandro is town. Why do you just assume that sandro is right if you just stated multiple reasons that indicate otherwise? I also don't really understand what's so interesting about this in general since based on sandros post it should be obvious what he is talking about (his own HP). btw as for my early d1 tedious-read on indignant 1. Breshke is quizzing scum - check 2. indignant claims it's like Breshke knows sand is town - check Good early read tbh.
Is there any point to this post or do you just feel like being tediousyourself? Any reason to think Breshke isn't scum? No? Then shut up.
|
On April 28 2015 22:53 marvellosity wrote:Show nested quote +On April 28 2015 22:52 indignant wrote:On April 28 2015 22:48 LightningStrike wrote:On April 28 2015 22:47 marvellosity wrote:On April 28 2015 22:46 Xatalos wrote:
If we assume that yamato is town (kind of likely), then Damdred looks a decent amount better for his critical vote on sandroba. thought experiment: what were Damdred's options? Sandroba or Yamato were his only options but he sheeped his townreads (Shining and HF). The townread/sheeping on shining is the thing that's weird about it. I also remembered that weneed to keep in mind that there is 3p in this game when evaluating wagons. P.S. I am replacing HF with you for my 3p read.
lol
|
On April 28 2015 22:54 marvellosity wrote:Show nested quote +On April 28 2015 22:53 indignant wrote:On April 28 2015 22:49 marvellosity wrote:On April 26 2015 20:44 indignant wrote:On April 26 2015 11:31 Breshke wrote:On April 26 2015 07:03 sandroba wrote:
Hello guys. I'm happy to have finally rolled town. Looks to me we have ~ 1 and a half lynches per complete cycle based on my own HP. Seems sweet and I expect mafia/3rd party to have some powerful roles based on that. Im really intrested how you figured it is 1 and a half lynches per complete cycle based on your hp and stuff since the first cycle there is no fight promoter and the fight only causes 5 dmg to each participant. Based on the information in the OP at all and my own HP I would think that someone would have to participate in multiple fights to be killed by this mechanic add that on with no fight first day cycle just don't get how you got to 1.5 lynches per day. This being said I think I heard your very good with mechanics, where did I read this I think marv said it? So i assume you are right I just don't see how.Also hi everyone This post feels off. The bolded paragraph in particular seems like Breshke knows that sandro is town. Why do you just assume that sandro is right if you just stated multiple reasons that indicate otherwise? I also don't really understand what's so interesting about this in general since based on sandros post it should be obvious what he is talking about (his own HP). btw as for my early d1 tedious-read on indignant 1. Breshke is quizzing scum - check 2. indignant claims it's like Breshke knows sand is town - check Good early read tbh. Is there any point to this post or do you just feel like being tediousyourself? Any reason to think Breshke isn't scum? No? Then shut up. Sure there are reasons. Why use your first option to attack a scum-mate's post? Offhand comment about visiting HF-PGO seems pretty town, and I think you even agree with this. Swamprat.
If you keep attacking me for an early read that you don't even know the actual correctness of then I will just ignore you from now on. Even if it wasn't a good read - so what?
|
On April 28 2015 22:55 marvellosity wrote:Show nested quote +On April 28 2015 22:54 Xatalos wrote:
What 3P? It isn't even guaranteed that there's a 3P or what kind? yes it is guaranteed and i just like to read prominent players as 3p
No idea why you feel the need to worsen your track record like that.
|
On April 28 2015 22:57 marvellosity wrote:Show nested quote +On April 28 2015 22:56 indignant wrote:On April 28 2015 22:54 marvellosity wrote:On April 28 2015 22:53 indignant wrote:On April 28 2015 22:49 marvellosity wrote:On April 26 2015 20:44 indignant wrote:On April 26 2015 11:31 Breshke wrote:On April 26 2015 07:03 sandroba wrote:
Hello guys. I'm happy to have finally rolled town. Looks to me we have ~ 1 and a half lynches per complete cycle based on my own HP. Seems sweet and I expect mafia/3rd party to have some powerful roles based on that. Im really intrested how you figured it is 1 and a half lynches per complete cycle based on your hp and stuff since the first cycle there is no fight promoter and the fight only causes 5 dmg to each participant. Based on the information in the OP at all and my own HP I would think that someone would have to participate in multiple fights to be killed by this mechanic add that on with no fight first day cycle just don't get how you got to 1.5 lynches per day. This being said I think I heard your very good with mechanics, where did I read this I think marv said it? So i assume you are right I just don't see how.Also hi everyone This post feels off. The bolded paragraph in particular seems like Breshke knows that sandro is town. Why do you just assume that sandro is right if you just stated multiple reasons that indicate otherwise? I also don't really understand what's so interesting about this in general since based on sandros post it should be obvious what he is talking about (his own HP). btw as for my early d1 tedious-read on indignant 1. Breshke is quizzing scum - check 2. indignant claims it's like Breshke knows sand is town - check Good early read tbh. Is there any point to this post or do you just feel like being tediousyourself? Any reason to think Breshke isn't scum? No? Then shut up. Sure there are reasons. Why use your first option to attack a scum-mate's post? Offhand comment about visiting HF-PGO seems pretty town, and I think you even agree with this. Swamprat. If you keep attacking me for an early read that you don't even know the actual correctness of then I will just ignore you from now on. Even if it wasn't a good read - so what? what do you mean "keep attacking" you? I brought it up once since then (the post you are responding to) and it wasn't even serious (how can a "tedious" read from early d1 be serious?) In your own words - "Chill".
You just called me 3p. I would call that an attack and an unwarranted one to boot.
|
There is literally 0 reason to read me as anything but town.
|
On April 28 2015 22:59 marvellosity wrote:Show nested quote +On April 28 2015 22:59 indignant wrote:
There is literally 0 reason to read me as anything but town. you've said there's literally 0 reason to read you as mafia when you were mafia before just sayin
So what?
|
Did you just decide "today is the day I will be terrible"?
|
On April 28 2015 23:01 marvellosity wrote:Show nested quote +On April 28 2015 23:01 indignant wrote:On April 28 2015 22:59 marvellosity wrote:On April 28 2015 22:59 indignant wrote:
There is literally 0 reason to read me as anything but town. you've said there's literally 0 reason to read you as mafia when you were mafia before just sayin So what? so when you say that, it's meaningless
No, it is not. Because you don't have to evaluate the statement itself but the stuff it is based on and that is completely different.
|
On April 28 2015 23:03 marvellosity wrote:Show nested quote +On April 28 2015 23:03 indignant wrote:On April 28 2015 23:01 marvellosity wrote:On April 28 2015 23:01 indignant wrote:On April 28 2015 22:59 marvellosity wrote:On April 28 2015 22:59 indignant wrote:
There is literally 0 reason to read me as anything but town. you've said there's literally 0 reason to read you as mafia when you were mafia before just sayin So what? so when you say that, it's meaningless No, it is not. Because you don't have to evaluate the statement itself but the stuff it is based on and that is completely different. The stuff it's based on is that you clearly claimed you would not return town to checks.
Which is what you say should be done as town and DID YOURSELF?!?!
|
On April 28 2015 23:04 marvellosity wrote:Show nested quote +On April 28 2015 23:04 indignant wrote:On April 28 2015 23:03 marvellosity wrote:On April 28 2015 23:03 indignant wrote:On April 28 2015 23:01 marvellosity wrote:On April 28 2015 23:01 indignant wrote:On April 28 2015 22:59 marvellosity wrote:On April 28 2015 22:59 indignant wrote:
There is literally 0 reason to read me as anything but town. you've said there's literally 0 reason to read you as mafia when you were mafia before just sayin So what? so when you say that, it's meaningless No, it is not. Because you don't have to evaluate the statement itself but the stuff it is based on and that is completely different. The stuff it's based on is that you clearly claimed you would not return town to checks. Which is what you say should be done as town and DID YOURSELF?!?! not the way you did it  I am 100% enjoying this madz though.
Because you did not have a claiming restriction you idiot.
|
On April 28 2015 23:05 Holyflare wrote:
Damdred don't give no shits about this game so if there was a single 3p I'd guess him over jat
No shit sherlock.
|
On April 28 2015 23:06 marvellosity wrote:Show nested quote +On April 28 2015 23:05 indignant wrote:On April 28 2015 23:04 marvellosity wrote:On April 28 2015 23:04 indignant wrote:On April 28 2015 23:03 marvellosity wrote:On April 28 2015 23:03 indignant wrote:On April 28 2015 23:01 marvellosity wrote:On April 28 2015 23:01 indignant wrote:On April 28 2015 22:59 marvellosity wrote:On April 28 2015 22:59 indignant wrote:
There is literally 0 reason to read me as anything but town. you've said there's literally 0 reason to read you as mafia when you were mafia before just sayin So what? so when you say that, it's meaningless No, it is not. Because you don't have to evaluate the statement itself but the stuff it is based on and that is completely different. The stuff it's based on is that you clearly claimed you would not return town to checks. Which is what you say should be done as town and DID YOURSELF?!?! not the way you did it I am 100% enjoying this madz though. Because you did not have a claiming restriction you idiot. only 3ps have claiming restrictions
Funny.
|
On April 28 2015 23:08 rsoultin wrote:
so it's the claims hf and jat made about their roles that has you thinking 3p?
can buy that
and one of these days i won't be talking to myself lol ><
Maybe it's the day you think about stuff before saying idiotic things like the bolded.
|
On April 28 2015 23:09 Holyflare wrote:
Pretty sure someone else had a restriction too
Stutters.
|
|
|
|
|
|
EPT
