|
On March 30 2015 06:43 rsoultin wrote:Show nested quote +On March 30 2015 06:39 Koshi wrote:On March 30 2015 06:38 rsoultin wrote:On March 30 2015 06:34 Koshi wrote:On March 30 2015 06:32 rsoultin wrote:On March 30 2015 06:31 Koshi wrote:On March 30 2015 06:30 rsoultin wrote:On March 30 2015 06:27 Koshi wrote:On March 30 2015 06:26 rsoultin wrote:On March 30 2015 06:25 Koshi wrote:
[quote]
Explain to me why snarfs is mafia. have already the big lovely plan followed by a load of nothing, no attempts at finding scumreads, a half-assed top town read, need i go on? Yes. Show me games you played together and snarfs was a town leader. it's a little late for this koshi. just because he's not normally a town leader (which is what i presume you're saying here) doesn't mean his apparent lack of interest in his own plan isn't alignment indicative unless you have something that proves otherwise? i'm going with majority opinion which apparently is scattershot as all hell right now THAT IS NOT HOW IT WORKS RSOULTIN. People do shit all as town. If there is no reason why town!snarfs can't post something and not follow up on it then there is no reason for you to call him mafia. If he in previous big games was involved and pushed his ideas then I can understand your scumread on him. Otherwise. How is he not a shot in the dark? who is not a shot in the dark at this point? People who have a filter? The point of this game is to find mafia based on facts. Or find the best shot. I don't see really good reasons for snarfs to be mafia. Nobody even seem to have meta on this guy. Why is he not a random 1 page filter townie? meh i don't agree with kita and bh hasn't done enough for me to want to lynch him even before the claim, wave of shadow has looked good and bad by equal measure to me...i'm not seeing much but policy lynches being brought forward and the hapa waffling damdy mentioned was something i noticed too...we were talking about it earlier How did WoS look good. TEll me. it's an overall impression...there was part of your case that i liked on him though...i really can't remember what exactly it was at the moment (either in his posting or your case) lol too many players in this game
EBWOP:
if you're willing to wait until after EoD i'll go back through his filter and your case and we can discuss it at length. that alright?
|
On March 30 2015 06:44 Hapahauli wrote:Show nested quote +On March 30 2015 06:42 rsoultin wrote:
Okay snarfs has been submitted as our lynch Waiiiit. Don't we have an hour left?
15 mins i think? if we have over an hour and opinions change i'll just send another pm lol
|
On March 30 2015 06:46 Chezitwo wrote:Show nested quote +On March 30 2015 06:39 Chezitwo wrote:On March 30 2015 06:36 rsoultin wrote:
okay 5 minutes...majority is leaning snarfs with three preferring him and one saying he's an okay lynch
i really can't cut it much closer than that and y'all are too busy arguing with one another -_- can you please focus here? Lynch who you think has the highest chance of flipping mafia. You don't necessarily know who is town or mafia influencing you. You know you are town. (I'm assuming this right now) Please tell me you understand this. If you are lynching Snarfs, I hope you're doing it because he is your top scumread.
he is
i don't have a ton of strong scumreads at the moment
|
On March 30 2015 06:46 Koshi wrote:Show nested quote +On March 30 2015 06:44 rsoultin wrote:On March 30 2015 06:43 rsoultin wrote:On March 30 2015 06:39 Koshi wrote:On March 30 2015 06:38 rsoultin wrote:On March 30 2015 06:34 Koshi wrote:On March 30 2015 06:32 rsoultin wrote:On March 30 2015 06:31 Koshi wrote:On March 30 2015 06:30 rsoultin wrote:On March 30 2015 06:27 Koshi wrote:
[quote]
Yes. Show me games you played together and snarfs was a town leader. it's a little late for this koshi. just because he's not normally a town leader (which is what i presume you're saying here) doesn't mean his apparent lack of interest in his own plan isn't alignment indicative unless you have something that proves otherwise? i'm going with majority opinion which apparently is scattershot as all hell right now THAT IS NOT HOW IT WORKS RSOULTIN. People do shit all as town. If there is no reason why town!snarfs can't post something and not follow up on it then there is no reason for you to call him mafia. If he in previous big games was involved and pushed his ideas then I can understand your scumread on him. Otherwise. How is he not a shot in the dark? who is not a shot in the dark at this point? People who have a filter? The point of this game is to find mafia based on facts. Or find the best shot. I don't see really good reasons for snarfs to be mafia. Nobody even seem to have meta on this guy. Why is he not a random 1 page filter townie? meh i don't agree with kita and bh hasn't done enough for me to want to lynch him even before the claim, wave of shadow has looked good and bad by equal measure to me...i'm not seeing much but policy lynches being brought forward and the hapa waffling damdy mentioned was something i noticed too...we were talking about it earlier How did WoS look good. TEll me. it's an overall impression...there was part of your case that i liked on him though...i really can't remember what exactly it was at the moment (either in his posting or your case) lol too many players in this game EBWOP: if you're willing to wait until after EoD i'll go back through his filter and your case and we can discuss it at length. that alright? It really upsets me that you for some reason have a townread on WoS. Because I know you thought he was mafia when I made those posts on WoS. And WoS didn't do anything to change that view. So yeah. I think it is really freaking odd you are lynching Snarfs here. Because snarfs looks like major policy lynch lynchbait to me and it is so cheap to go to him instantly without looking through better targets. Which is basically what you did since you came back.
you confuse saying i kinda like your case with saying i think he's scum koshi -_- he's hovering at null for me
|
On March 30 2015 06:56 kitaman27 wrote:Show nested quote +On March 30 2015 05:48 Blazinghand wrote:
ok fine let's kill snarfs then
as long as we're not killing me I'm good honestly. I don't really have reads since this thread is a monstrosity and every time I leave for a half day I come back and there's 50 pages of "wat" @rsoul ignoring the implications from slam, are you really content with allowing a player who has only spoke about koshi, his role, and the post above?
i think he's no more or less interesting as a lynch than any of the other many "crapshoots" people are talking about
he wasn't one of my top lynches even before his claim? but i've always said i'll go with majority so if y'all want me to lynch him, just say so
|
On March 30 2015 06:59 kitaman27 wrote:Show nested quote +On March 30 2015 06:58 Onegu wrote:On March 30 2015 06:56 kitaman27 wrote:On March 30 2015 05:48 Blazinghand wrote:
ok fine let's kill snarfs then
as long as we're not killing me I'm good honestly. I don't really have reads since this thread is a monstrosity and every time I leave for a half day I come back and there's 50 pages of "wat" @rsoul ignoring the implications from slam, are you really content with allowing a player who has only spoke about koshi, his role, and the post above? Why the hell would she ignore slam at this point? I'm asking her to justify the non-BH lynch in a scenario where that wasn't an issue.
i've already stated before that i don't expect much from blazinghand...i don't see why his play here makes him town or scum...he was similarly unimpressive in titanic lol
|
On March 30 2015 06:58 Hapahauli wrote:
To elaborate on #1...
Let's say that your top scumread claims 3p. I highly doubt that any town will instantly believe that claim. At the very least, there will be some doubt in there that your top scumread is making a play or fake-claiming.
Trfel just instantly believes sicklucker which is so hard to explain.
this post i like though :/
the 3p thing did stick out to me in his post when i first saw it...i can see lynching claimed 3p over all these kinda nullish players, but that trfel believed him where most of us didn't is odd
|
On March 30 2015 07:02 justanothertownie wrote:Show nested quote +On March 30 2015 06:59 rsoultin wrote:On March 30 2015 06:56 kitaman27 wrote:On March 30 2015 05:48 Blazinghand wrote:
ok fine let's kill snarfs then
as long as we're not killing me I'm good honestly. I don't really have reads since this thread is a monstrosity and every time I leave for a half day I come back and there's 50 pages of "wat" @rsoul ignoring the implications from slam, are you really content with allowing a player who has only spoke about koshi, his role, and the post above? i think he's no more or less interesting as a lynch than any of the other many "crapshoots" people are talking about he wasn't one of my top lynches even before his claim? but i've always said i'll go with majority so if y'all want me to lynch him, just say so I want you to kill Trfel.
i'm down for a truffle lynch
|
On March 30 2015 07:04 Koshi wrote:
wait rsoultin is still here? what was the hurry with snarfs then?
lol i thought eod was 5 mins ago...i was just reacting to the mod post to get things in
we still have plenty of time to discuss so my bad :/
|
i think my daylight savings time isn't activated in my account cause that vote post just read 0/0 to me lol
anyway
i think it's more important if HF has disappeared to make sure he's not one of the three -_-
|
On March 30 2015 07:08 batsnacks wrote:
RS is suddenly a bad choice for warrior. There's like 2% of the day left, she wants to lynch snarf and then suddenly she wants to lynch trfel. Neither of these players have posted or done anything recently there is no reason she should be waffling between the two right now.
who do you want to lynch, bats?
|
On March 30 2015 07:11 justanothertownie wrote:Show nested quote +On March 30 2015 07:10 rsoultin wrote:
i think my daylight savings time isn't activated in my account cause that vote post just read 0/0 to me lol
anyway
i think it's more important if HF has disappeared to make sure he's not one of the three -_- Then vote someone else. Currently HF isn't one of the 3 anyways though.
he is
the mods got it wrong xP
and i'm not voting him anyway
what you think i'm just gonna comment about it for no reason?
|
On March 30 2015 07:18 batsnacks wrote:Show nested quote +On March 30 2015 07:11 rsoultin wrote:On March 30 2015 07:08 batsnacks wrote:
RS is suddenly a bad choice for warrior. There's like 2% of the day left, she wants to lynch snarf and then suddenly she wants to lynch trfel. Neither of these players have posted or done anything recently there is no reason she should be waffling between the two right now. who do you want to lynch, bats? I think there are a lot of great choices. If it was me picking I would pick exo. I think the person deciding the lynch should be more decisive than you're being. First you want to lynch snarf, you gave reasons, snarf never posted, now suddenly you want to lynch trfel? Have you even given reasons for a trfel lynch?
i think both are decent lynches. snarfs for the odd posting around hapa and the blah townread on chez i believe it was
truffle cause while earlier i thought the whole 3p thing was more null than scum, the instant belief in sicklucker's claim is odd
which all isn't terribly important since as i've said multiple times now, i'm going with the majority vote
i've also confirmed that i can change the lynch as long as it's not too close to deadline
|
On March 30 2015 07:19 Holyflare wrote:
i will lynch sicklucker for either being mafia or 3p with a good chance of being mafia for having 3 pages of filter because i'd feel like as 3p he's be just as productive as town
it also allows all these "coin flip" ppl to talk more
meh
|
On March 30 2015 07:26 Holyflare wrote:
a lynch on sl is a lynch on guaranteed not town!
you believe a softed third party claim as well?
|
okay i'm still on snarfs just as an fyi
|
On March 30 2015 07:45 justanothertownie wrote:Show nested quote +On March 30 2015 07:43 rsoultin wrote:
okay i'm still on snarfs just as an fyi Didn't you say you would vote with the majority? First of all you should value the opinion of your townreads. Second of all vote me unless you think VE is more towny than I am.
already voted you
and yes, but if y'all think i can keep track of the bh/snarfs/trfel majority right now lol
i am on snarfs
if y'all want that changed you need to say so NOW
i'd prefer snarfs to trfel anyway so there's that
|
On March 30 2015 07:49 justanothertownie wrote:Show nested quote +On March 30 2015 07:48 rsoultin wrote:On March 30 2015 07:45 justanothertownie wrote:On March 30 2015 07:43 rsoultin wrote:
okay i'm still on snarfs just as an fyi Didn't you say you would vote with the majority? First of all you should value the opinion of your townreads. Second of all vote me unless you think VE is more towny than I am. already voted you and yes, but if y'all think i can keep track of the bh/snarfs/trfel majority right now lol i am on snarfs if y'all want that changed you need to say so NOW i'd prefer snarfs to trfel anyway so there's that Why? What's towny about Trfel?
he's making sense and i know i'll be able to read him once he posts more
|
On March 30 2015 07:51 justanothertownie wrote:Show nested quote +On March 30 2015 07:50 rsoultin wrote:On March 30 2015 07:49 justanothertownie wrote:On March 30 2015 07:48 rsoultin wrote:On March 30 2015 07:45 justanothertownie wrote:On March 30 2015 07:43 rsoultin wrote:
okay i'm still on snarfs just as an fyi Didn't you say you would vote with the majority? First of all you should value the opinion of your townreads. Second of all vote me unless you think VE is more towny than I am. already voted you and yes, but if y'all think i can keep track of the bh/snarfs/trfel majority right now lol i am on snarfs if y'all want that changed you need to say so NOW i'd prefer snarfs to trfel anyway so there's that Why? What's towny about Trfel? he's making sense and i know i'll be able to read him once he posts more What exactly did he say that makes sense?
i don't know that he's right that all 3p are anti-town, but if he believes it, his scumread "claiming" 3p would just make him want to lynch them more. this makes sense
|
do we want sicklucker? cause i can vote for HF assuming he's already submitted that
|
|
|
|
|
|
EPT
