|
On September 03 2014 00:32 Damdred wrote:Show nested quote +On September 03 2014 00:08 27ninjabunnies wrote:
Oh and by shoot him, I mean shoot batsnacks, not 3d12. Though I might be willing to get him out of the game too. Why are you so willing to shoot batsnacks? You even say that this is fool batsnacks in your post, it seems kinda weird you would want to shoot bats when you think hes possibly trying to get lynched..... And why would you be willing to get 3d12 out of the game? He seems awkward its true, and his read on bats is faulty (his initial reasons anyway) but does not getting him out of the game for those reasons seem a bit flimsy to you?
So a fool's win condition is to be lynched (hey, could be a mafia mission too).
Basically, I'm trying to keep all my options open. It's how I approach the game.
For all I know, we don't even have 3p or vigi. But it was just an idea. So, therefore, that's why I said shoot him rather than lynch.
As for 3d12, more of a gut read, but I don't like his posting. Sure the bs read is slightly based on that, but his posting is awkward in general.
|
Tbh, I was expecting more pages than this when I got back.
how disappointing. Hope it's worth reading in my class today.
Anything special happened?
|
On September 03 2014 22:05 kitaman27 wrote:Show nested quote +On September 02 2014 14:03 27ninjabunnies wrote:
So I just skimmed the thread, but is there anything specific I should look at?
Did someone say batsnacks made a terrible post? Shows a lack of effort here. The thread is incredibly small that skimming is not necessary, you can read everything in 10 minutes. She asks about the batsnacks post, yet he has like 2-3 posts at this point. How difficult is it to click the filter button and give an opinion, rather than asking to be pointed to the post? The batsnack third party speculation could be a mafia mindsight if she knows he isn't scum. At one point she mentions, "why focus on missions when we should be finding mafia", yet at no point in the thread is she actually attempting to find mafia, aside from mentioning 3d in passing. When she returns to the thread, she mentions how disappointing it is the the thread is so small, yet when the thread was small, she couldn't be bothered to read it to begin with. Again, she asks about anything worth reading, instead of attempting to bring new ideas to the thread. I'd put her in my red pool right now. (Ahead of kush, maybe bumping out Oats?). I still want to reread 3d one more time, but I'm between bunnies and the M guy who doesn't post.
1. It's not a lack of effort. If you read my town games you'll understand why I do the above. What one person finds important in the thread, another may not. I like to gauge where people are at within the thread and how they are thinking. The easiest way to do that is to ask what key points happened within the thread, and then to question as to why that's important to them. If you notice, I did exactly that to Templar.
2. Wrong, I'm finding mafia.
3. I'm reading and commenting. See point one. (I also have another page with all the points I'm going to address. You'll see it in about 2 minutes.
4. Yay, pools that are red. Kinda reminds me of Lllamas with Hats when they are in the boat filled with the blood of the Elderly couple.
|
I'm on page 18 right now- which isn't much, but I'll go ahead and post this random tidbit that has prob no basis at all, but I don't care.
On September 03 2014 00:50 Oatsmaster wrote:
why do you want to kill 3p rather than mafia bunnies?
Why wouldn't you? I want to kill both.
Plus we don't even know if there is a 3p role in this game. Like I said just an idea.
On September 03 2014 00:55 Damdred wrote:Show nested quote +On September 03 2014 00:44 27ninjabunnies wrote:On September 03 2014 00:32 Damdred wrote:On September 03 2014 00:08 27ninjabunnies wrote:
Oh and by shoot him, I mean shoot batsnacks, not 3d12. Though I might be willing to get him out of the game too. Why are you so willing to shoot batsnacks? You even say that this is fool batsnacks in your post, it seems kinda weird you would want to shoot bats when you think hes possibly trying to get lynched..... And why would you be willing to get 3d12 out of the game? He seems awkward its true, and his read on bats is faulty (his initial reasons anyway) but does not getting him out of the game for those reasons seem a bit flimsy to you? So a fool's win condition is to be lynched (hey, could be a mafia mission too). Basically, I'm trying to keep all my options open. It's how I approach the game. For all I know, we don't even have 3p or vigi. But it was just an idea. So, therefore, that's why I said shoot him rather than lynch. As for 3d12, more of a gut read, but I don't like his posting. Sure the bs read is slightly based on that, but his posting is awkward in general. Oh i misunderstood what you were saying about bats, I thought you were just calling him a fool in general not the role fool. I do not know if their is a third party so i'll leave that alone for now. But does awkward=scummy always? Is that a good way to go about scum reading people?
Awkward does not necessarily equal scummy. But mafia tend to be more awkward in their posting because of not being sure what to say, I find.
On September 03 2014 02:32 The_Templar wrote:Show nested quote +On September 03 2014 02:28 Micchan wrote:
Ok here whatever
Im srry 3d i highly suspect ing u after backtracking...ur obviously trying to divert attention rn... this forum only speaks english
Stop being mean to new people.
@3d12- you said my read on tehpoofter was silly and based on troll posts, but I think I gave a bit more reasoning than that. why is the read silly to you? What do you think of poofter so far?
Also http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/mafia/465384-mission-mini-mafia?page=17#338<--------- Town tehpoof
|
On September 03 2014 22:15 Vivax wrote:
Ima take a nap now so just in case I sleep through til deadline by mistake I'm gonna put a placeholder vote on the "low hanging fruit", cause after all it's never a bad option for a D1 lynch.
##Vote: Micchan
I like what kitaman has to say about nb.
After your nap, can you expand on your reads here?
On September 03 2014 06:40 Vivax wrote:
3d12 sounds a lot like obviousone.
I also don't think he's scum.
Scum is among this bunch imo:
- Templar
- Kush
- Kita
- 27nb
- micchan
Preferably before your nap if you can
|
On September 03 2014 08:25 Tehpoofter wrote:Show nested quote +On September 03 2014 08:24 batsnacks wrote:On September 03 2014 08:22 kushm4sta wrote:
but who would you fuck he said he would bang vivax vivax/kush/oats atm.
Always knew you were into threesomes.
I like your reads, though the ones I would disagree on would be Vivax as town, and me and Templar as mafia. The others are pretty good, and coincide to where I'm at in this game.
|
On September 03 2014 22:23 kitaman27 wrote:Show nested quote +On September 03 2014 21:13 batsnacks wrote:
If I'm gambling, I bet kitaman is mafia and his mission is that he has to vote with the majority.
##vote: kitaman27 Thoughts?
Well, Bat's read disagrees with mine. I find you quite townie. Your posts have been pretty good, your reads aren't too bad (though reads arent technically alignment indicative), and your questions have been great. I like where your mind is at. Mostly.
Tho, not sure if bats vote is troll or actually serious. If serious, Im curious as to the conclusion he came up with on you and how you are mafia.
|
Brb, headed to my next class, and won't be on for another 1-2 hours! (Don't worry. I'll be back for deadline)
|
On September 03 2014 11:59 ObiWanShinobi wrote:Show nested quote +On September 03 2014 11:58 Tehpoofter wrote:On September 03 2014 11:54 ObiWanShinobi wrote:
Someone ask me some questions or some shit. a/s/l? 19/f/cali hbu?
Bullshit
(Im back for like ten mins)
|
I'll leave you with this to stir over.
Mafia
3d12
Oats
Bat (I'm also still sticking with possible 3p here. Cause why the fuck not)
Vivax
Micchan (play the game dude, or get lynched)
Towniest Town that Ever Towned
Poofter
Templar
Sorta Town
Kita
Damdred
Everyone else- Unknown/not important/ don't really care about.
|
@Damdred- I havent really liked anything he has said so far. I can go into more detail of this in about an hour or so. Yes, I haven't mentioned anything about Oats so far, but that's because I didn't have anything to go on, until I read and caught up today.
@Templar- I'm a she.
|
Also @Damdred-
I don't necessarily like him, nor dislike him at this point.
I figure the immediate vote on me was a joke/troll vote. Nothing else said has caught my attention.
He's in the don'tcare/unknown pile
|
The above was about Obi, btw.
|
On September 04 2014 00:22 Oatsmaster wrote:Show nested quote +On September 03 2014 23:58 27ninjabunnies wrote:
@Damdred- I havent really liked anything he has said so far. I can go into more detail of this in about an hour or so. Yes, I haven't mentioned anything about Oats so far, but that's because I didn't have anything to go on, until I read and caught up today.
@Templar- I'm a she. hey you've been posting since I started, thats total bullshit.
What does me posting have to do with my read on you?
You aren't very memorable. So don't "that's bullshit" me mister.
Also, why the hell are you getting so defensive at me calling you mafia?
|
On September 04 2014 01:09 The_Templar wrote:Show nested quote +On September 04 2014 01:07 27ninjabunnies wrote:On September 04 2014 00:22 Oatsmaster wrote:On September 03 2014 23:58 27ninjabunnies wrote:
@Damdred- I havent really liked anything he has said so far. I can go into more detail of this in about an hour or so. Yes, I haven't mentioned anything about Oats so far, but that's because I didn't have anything to go on, until I read and caught up today.
@Templar- I'm a she. hey you've been posting since I started, thats total bullshit. What does me posting have to do with my read on you? You aren't very memorable. So don't "that's bullshit" me mister. Also, why the hell are you getting so defensive at me calling you mafia? He's not memorable but you are leaning scarlet on him?
Yes, I'll point the posts out that I dont like, and the rest arent memorable or have no basis imo.
On September 02 2014 17:58 Oatsmaster wrote:
actually everyone giving a read on bats is scummy.
namely obi, kush kita, among others which is cant remember.
Kush says bats is scum for 0 content when barely anyone posted.
I can say that rereading his filter, he isn't all bad, and I might move him to neutral leaning scum than outright scum.
He has a few reads that coincide with mine.
I'm a little confused on this post with him though.
On September 02 2014 22:17 Oatsmaster wrote:Show nested quote +On September 02 2014 22:08 ObiWanShinobi wrote:On September 02 2014 21:48 Oatsmaster wrote:
I prefer not to guess what batsnacks is doing. Safe to say, whatever it is, it isn't very useful.
##vote: obiwan
wat. Policy lynching is scum favored
Also, Oats said policy lynching is bad, but isn't him voting Micchan basically policy lynching since he is lurking and not playing the game (Not that I'm against the M vote). But lurkers get policy lynched usually.
|
Im proposing an alternate wagon.
I was gonna go for 3d12, but I found I liked his earlier posting. Especially this one:
On September 02 2014 09:06 3d12 wrote:Thanks Damdred, that was a good explanation. From my RL experience with Mafia, I've found it's usually good to have multiple options at the end of the day like you said, to be able to better piece together who is siding with whom in the long run. I'd say that's a defensible tactic to employ later on, but I'd agree that it serves no purpose in the first few days. Especially when we have no hint whatsoever as to what these missions are. From Templar's post, I think this stuck out to me the most: Show nested quote +
And the missions are required for mafia… or they will die. I would say that's better for us anyway
He makes a good point. We're making a witch-hunt out of nothing right now. I think batsnacks is judging reactions and playing provocateur. He looks pretty town from where I'm standing, but I don't have all my chips on the table just yet. 
However now towards the end of the day, he hasnt really posted much. Not my lynch for today, but I'm keeping an eye on him.
However, ##Vote: Batsnacks
|
On September 04 2014 03:23 ObiWanShinobi wrote:
What did you like about that post? A whole bunch of people hated it because he called batsnacks town for next to no reason.
On September 02 2014 09:06 3d12 wrote:Thanks Damdred, that was a good explanation. From my RL experience with Mafia, I've found it's usually good to have multiple options at the end of the day like you said, to be able to better piece together who is siding with whom in the long run. I'd say that's a defensible tactic to employ later on, but I'd agree that it serves no purpose in the first few days. Especially when we have no hint whatsoever as to what these missions are.From Templar's post, I think this stuck out to me the most: Show nested quote +
And the missions are required for mafia… or they will die. I would say that's better for us anyway
He makes a good point. We're making a witch-hunt out of nothing right now. I think batsnacks is judging reactions and playing provocateur. He looks pretty town from where I'm standing, but I don't have all my chips on the table just yet.
Not the batsnacks part. Sorry, I should have bolded it and made it more clear.
The bolded part above I like.
Hence my proposal of a second wagon.
|
On September 04 2014 03:28 ObiWanShinobi wrote:
So you're okay with him calling Batsnacks town for no reason?
No im not okay with it. I've already said that.
Learn to read.
And kush, I'll answer in a min. Im on the phone and multitasking
|
OKAY! And I'm back
Reasons why BS and his posts are actually BS and mean he is scum (and I'm going in order of posts he has/commenting a bit on each one)
1. Batsnack posts a useless post that (prob) has nothing to do with the game.
2. Randomly votes Templar, and has no reason as to why.
3. His 3d12 is apologetic and means he is scum is super super weird.
4. Takes his vote off of templar because of voting thread? What? Still makes no sense, and hasnt explained why templar is scum.
5. What?
On September 03 2014 21:13 batsnacks wrote:
If I'm gambling, I bet kitaman is mafia and his mission is that he has to vote with the majority.
##vote: kitaman27
6. His last post is probably the most substantial and insightful of the game. but this is several posts after the above vote on Kita. It's him explaining why kita is mafia- because kita thinks we should all vote an hour before the end of day and has said it twice.
tldr. Batsnacks pulling stuff outta of his ass. Lynch for today
|
On September 04 2014 03:39 ObiWanShinobi wrote:Show nested quote +On September 04 2014 03:31 27ninjabunnies wrote:On September 04 2014 03:28 ObiWanShinobi wrote:
So you're okay with him calling Batsnacks town for no reason? No im not okay with it. I've already said that. Learn to read. And kush, I'll answer in a min. Im on the phone and multitasking The issue isn't actually that you do/don't like certain parts of the post. The issue is that you're agreeing with someone that you don't particularly trust onto someone they're calling town for no reason in a post that you yourself hate. The next part of your answer really depends on what you give us in regards to batsnacks, because what you're doing right now doesn't really make sense from a purely logical standpoint. My gut is telling me that you're just trying to help, but eh, I don't think that taking a scumread's advice onto someone else is the course of action you really want to take here. ##unvoteAlso, mderg brought up a really good point in stating that that post was kind of generic and shitty across the board. I'm probably going to read into 3d because I keep forgetting that he's here.
It's not mafia indicative to like parts of people's posting and not the other parts.
For example: I like tehpoof's reads, but I don't like all of them. That doesn't make me mafia.
I get what you are saying though.
But 3d12 has reasons for liking batsnacks, I have reasons as to why I don't.
But I do like some parts that 3d12 has pointed out, speciically when he was responding to damdred.
Does that make him town? Idk, but I'm giving him town points for it.
Like i said, leaning scummy/neutral now rather than an outright scum read.
|
|
|
|
|
|
EPT
