| Forum Index > TL Mafia |
|
Teemursu
Finland839 Posts
On July 30 2014 10:00 Tehpoofter wrote: TEEMU IS MAFIA I'm like 75% sure. Who is around to talk about how right I am? Why do you think so? 75% is quite strong of an opinion.  Heading off soon, so won't be posting much right now. | ||
|
Teemursu
Finland839 Posts
On July 30 2014 10:26 lilwade wrote: Teemu started off active he kind of dabbled in some good questions but pursue like I would have, he had a lot of filler posts to appear more active, and he has currently been asleep for almost 16 hours. If I had to question your marry bang kill list i would say: 1) I am not so sure that there are any marry's here yet, kudus for you actually choosing someone tho Jennyhell seems to be very active and appear townie, albeit, I never make a true top town d1 2) I am on your kill list when I the town hero, you may not see it now but d2 is when the big boys come to play. 3) A bit quick to judge seeya, I think he has had some solid posts and is trying to contribute to town. Wait, I have? Shit. | ||
|
Teemursu
Finland839 Posts
On July 30 2014 10:39 Tehpoofter wrote: I ain't scared to push him Roman Numeral Guy! Step it up. ##unvote ##Vote: DCLXVI How sure are you that he is mafia? >75%? | ||
|
Teemursu
Finland839 Posts
On July 30 2014 12:27 Tehpoofter wrote: You feel apathetic towards the game. I feel like you would be in here posting like instantly upon waking up if you were town just from how I feel you play. Its 75% cause I want to see if you were busy or hear your reads. I also was wanting to talk to people cause no one was talking. Give reads. I literally just woke up. Actually, I lied, I tried to get Naxx working first. So far, I haven't read most of the thread with thought. I haven't really given any reads (which is the reason most people are going against me? Idk) because it was still very early in the game, and people started being more active when I was focusing on trying to getting into bed/focusing on getting legend in Hearthstone. Anyways, I like the spot I'm in, I generally get very good reads when people are pushing on me. My initial gutfeelz are that Seeyalater is mafia. Reading his filter kind of confirms this to me, so you should probably do it yourself too, but it feels to me like he is trying to kind of blend in town by "agreeing a lot with everyone else says" (first page) and then posted a liszt of reads in which I didn't feel the reasoning for the reads was too strong. Jenny is pretty towny, lotsa content and probably is going to have the second longest filter (after me). I kinda wish lilwade would've followed up with his "reaction tests". Not posting too many reads while creating the opportunity for himself makes me lean scum on him. 666's case was okay, but it kinda gave a feeling that he was trying too hard to justify his vote? Idk. I would kind of like to see the questions he wanted me to follow up with since I'm too lazy myself. | ||
|
Teemursu
Finland839 Posts
| ||
|
Teemursu
Finland839 Posts
Anyway, wanted to add up on Seeyalater. Like, he's being noncommittal at first (like Poofter called him out for), "agrees" a lot with people, and then makes a list of reads that kind of repeat the same old people have already said. I kind of tunneled hard for Vivax because of this last game, but saying stuff like "How odd.........." without calling a person is mafia is veeerryy scum indicative. You kind of imply that that person is mafia without actually calling them mafia, which lets you a) have your options open b) make it easy to defend yourself and c) not piss anyone off. Making a list like that so early in the game is suspicious as well. I rarely see town have many "good" reads, and I've seen mafia more often sheep everyone's general direction early on. Making a list like that rings to me either fabricating reads or sheeping (which I've pointed out before). | ||
|
Teemursu
Finland839 Posts
On July 30 2014 05:48 Teemursu wrote: I'm not calling you mafia yet. Off to bed now, for realsies. Will be F5'ing occasionally with the phone. I wanted to see how he reacted/posted after this, and see if he actually calls someone mafia, but now I actually do want to say you're mafia. | ||
|
Teemursu
Finland839 Posts
| ||
|
Teemursu
Finland839 Posts
On July 30 2014 08:26 Tehpoofter wrote: Teemu: He fooled me last game and bump that guy. He isn't talking nearly as much as he did last game which is concerning (I think??) he was mafia last game and is doing something different which should make him townier but what hes doing is in general scummier. I'm confused on him and therefore would want him to die. So many people hold a grudge against me in this game, LOL. | ||
|
Teemursu
Finland839 Posts
On July 30 2014 12:27 Tehpoofter wrote: Sure did vote on him. So probably pretty sure. Or maybe I wanted him to talk.  What do you think? I asked because if he's lower than >75%, shouldn't you still be voting on me? Anyway, I kinda expressed my opinion on Seeyalater above. | ||
|
Teemursu
Finland839 Posts
On July 30 2014 13:19 GlowingBear wrote: Teemu, if you read my "short" case, you'll identify that I AM calling them mafia for that. The ending will make it sure for you. Read from main point to the ending. You'll see that I am not voting them because I prefer to vote lurkers. I did read it and I agree that there are some scummy things you pointed out, but I don't think they're BOTH mafia and I wouldn't approach it from that perspective. Hope you didn't think that post was about you, I was talking about Seeyalater. | ||
|
Teemursu
Finland839 Posts
| ||
|
Teemursu
Finland839 Posts
| ||
|
Teemursu
Finland839 Posts
On July 30 2014 11:54 DCLXVI wrote: Oh man I know I just went off on Teemursu on this if you don't follow up on this or post your opinions too I will not be happy. This is a mafia post. I mean, what's the point of this? Why don't you first see if he does or doesn't and then push on him? Feels like you're trying to preemptively justify your push on him. | ||
|
Teemursu
Finland839 Posts
On July 30 2014 09:31 Lord Tolkien wrote: Also, if you've checked out my previous TL mafia game filters, you'll know how threadbare that analysis post was <_<; I usually have much more to say but eh, this game is KIND OF slow. Form moar bandwagons and accuse ppl...ppl. Why don't you do it yourself? I read you as town for your reads liszt post but this kind of attitude is scum-like | ||
|
Teemursu
Finland839 Posts
 Well, off to work now. Will be back in < 3 hours. Hopefully someone posts something about my content. | ||
|
Teemursu
Finland839 Posts
| ||
|
Teemursu
Finland839 Posts
On July 30 2014 13:41 GlowingBear wrote: I don't remember those posts, I usually don't like them thanks to you. Anyway, saying that I was trying to put town on the right track is ok. Town reading me only for that is strange. I'll definitely re-read the thread to catch those things, if it doesn't get more than 40 pages lol. Give me your opinion on that, also. I'll find the post(s) once I come back to a computer, but for now I don't feel like you did anything to keep town in the right direction after we had the conversation about Jenny. Point is, it sounds like a very"easy" read to give especially without substantiating and quoting the posts in which you've apparently done that. | ||
|
Teemursu
Finland839 Posts
On July 30 2014 14:28 DCLXVI wrote: Because he actually started having firm opinions on things, as opposed to your attitude of "I think Seeyalater is scum(but I am not voting him.) ##Vote Seeyalater Forgot ro, fix'd. Anyway, I thought you still found poofter scummy after your last post and seeing that you stipped posting after that. If you don't, could you instead focus on scumhunting or comment on my content? | ||
|
Teemursu
Finland839 Posts
On July 30 2014 13:45 DCLXVI wrote: Your conversations were meaningless jokes and you threw a few votes around for no reason, that to me is spam. Once you finally started contributing after your small and then clarified largerer reads on everyone I saw the spam was mixed in with real posts. After that you picked it up with some decent lines of questioning that lead to information about others, and I now know your opinions on people. This is what I classify as spam, do you disagree? + Show Spoiler + On July 30 2014 03:56 Tehpoofter wrote: Yeah no way your face is annoying but you claimed it is. Why would you lie? On July 30 2014 04:00 Tehpoofter wrote: Saying I'm not funny? ##unvote ##Vote lilwade On July 30 2014 08:29 Tehpoofter wrote: I wasn't suppose to share that with everyone i knew? I understand that you are responding to people in these, but that does not help me figure out who is what, it just makes you look active and your filter harder to read. You posted that you would actually say stuff about people, then went straight back to what you were doing before, that is why I voted for you. On July 30 2014 14:28 DCLXVI wrote: Because he actually started having firm opinions on things, as opposed to your attitude of "I think Seeyalater is scum(but I am not voting him.) Why didn't you mention this in the post you obviously put effort into? Also, is the reason you're voting on me that I didn't have my vote placed on Seeyalater? I've stated my opinions firmly, so Idk how exactly my attitude is opposed to Poofter's. | ||
| ||
StarCraft 2 StarCraft: Brood War Dota 2 League of Legends Other Games |
|
OSC
Solar vs MaxPax
ByuN vs Krystianer
Spirit vs TBD
OSC
Korean StarCraft League
OSC
OSC
IPSL
Dewalt vs Bonyth
OSC
uThermal 2v2 Circuit
Replay Cast
Patches Events
|
|
|
EPT
