EPTCarnival Cruise Mafia
| Forum Index > TL Mafia |
|
strongandbig
United States4858 Posts
| ||
|
strongandbig
United States4858 Posts
if you gave everyone in the game a gun | ||
|
strongandbig
United States4858 Posts
then you will know true chaos | ||
|
strongandbig
United States4858 Posts
| ||
|
strongandbig
United States4858 Posts
| ||
|
strongandbig
United States4858 Posts
On May 10 2013 06:43 ObviousOne wrote: I drew role cop FYI nope i did ![[image loading]](http://i.imgur.com/PZYqygl.png) | ||
|
strongandbig
United States4858 Posts
On May 11 2013 08:52 ObviousOne wrote: http://www.cnn.com/2013/05/09/world/asia/australia-missing-cruise-passengers/index.html?hpt=hp_t2 holy shit ace thats taking mafia to a whole other level | ||
|
strongandbig
United States4858 Posts
On May 13 2013 05:41 DarthPunk wrote: That is actually true that miller is an auto town claim in C9++ or other open set ups but it is still a good town play to claim straight away in my opinion and others. I am not an excellent policy lynch though, I am a bad lynch period. If you want to kill me use a vig shot. Otherwise wait a while and see. Lynching me straight up is just silly. And I would never claim anything day one as scum, let alone somethign as batshit crazy to claim as miller in a closed setup. I might crumb something. My one and only fake claim was basically forced out of me AFTER I crumbed it and AFTER everyone mass claimed and were pressuring me to follow suit. like just apply some thought to claiming miller this early as scum in a game which most likely contains vigilantes there is no follow up or promotion of a mafia agenda by doing this. it is plain suicide. this is really stupid. I am always extremely suspicious of people who say this, it doesn't make any sense. On May 13 2013 03:34 Oatsmaster wrote: I say at the start of the day. Everyone ##Vote: SOMEONE then the person with the majority in any way gets to fight for their life. Sounds like a great idea right? YEAH  I like this idea though. way better than someone doing something stupid and then saying "it was something stupid on purpose to judge reactions trolol" | ||
|
strongandbig
United States4858 Posts
| ||
|
strongandbig
United States4858 Posts
On May 13 2013 08:14 ObviousOne wrote: VE what do you make of me being strongly in favor of lynching DP if he doesn't die tonight? Same question at you BH. i will answer your question i happen to agree with dp on the subejct of millers shoudl claiming therefore i think you are being stupid your question has been asnwered | ||
|
strongandbig
United States4858 Posts
On May 13 2013 08:39 Blazinghand wrote: get dunked ![[image loading]](http://25.media.tumblr.com/ab97fdfb66bfbe4031f3f6b9fe44a039/tumblr_mhog0srM5J1s3v8rqo1_400.gif) | ||
|
strongandbig
United States4858 Posts
On May 13 2013 14:30 ObviousOne wrote: @SNB Hi, your town credit via gif just expired, let's hear you give the old scum hunting a whirl. Who do you want to vote today, and why, lay it out for me along with another suspect. So far your contributions add up to what looks like a 180 on DP (you call his statement that he is a bad policy lynch suspicious but then tell me that lynching him D1 if he doesn't die N0 is stupid) in a matter of a handful of posts and your stance on him was never clear. The conversation immediately got buried by gifs, so it's time for you to take a stance on something. Go. regarding the "flipflop" - lolno. I can simultaneously believe that him saying "i'm a bad lynch" is stupid and that you saying "we should lynch him if he doesn't die n0 because of his miller claim" is stupid. those are both stupid things to say. like, anyone who thinks they have a coherent theory of the scum team at this point is lying either to you or to themselves. we have no flipped scum to build association cases on, we dont even have any really good cases on individual players to build associations on. this is still the stage of the game where we should be looking at everyone who does something scummy or suspicious, even if those scummy things are conflicting. anyway i thought i made my stance on him pretty clear when i said i agreed with his reasoning for claiming miller. his claim was the main reason people wanted to lynch him afaik, so if i'm saying i think that he was right and they were wrong, i probably dont want to lynch him. | ||
|
strongandbig
United States4858 Posts
On May 13 2013 23:38 Oatsmaster wrote: I say we lynch him for this really fucking bad attitude and promises that he is giving. I dont like promises. this may be the single worst post in the thread | ||
|
strongandbig
United States4858 Posts
On May 13 2013 13:51 Oatsmaster wrote: Also someone stole my fucking vote  . Joke's on them though, I never actually vote for scum. how did this go by without any comment not having played in many games with vote stealers before I don't know what the analysis is, but why would someone steal oats's vote? instead of someone who is actually good at finding scum? Does fakeclaiming having your vote stolen give an excuse to insta-hammer someone? it seems like a decent scum tactic. I really don't like the way this claim went down. | ||
|
strongandbig
United States4858 Posts
On May 13 2013 15:46 Oatsmaster wrote: I have no clue what it means You are saying that DP fakeclaimed right? And rayn is saying that Wall-street investor could be scum.Right. That makes no sense because I assume he thinks that DP's role, Self aware miller could be a scum role. Which it cant cause DUHHHH. So rayn scum slipped kinda. But its not really scummy the way he phrased that. TLDR: Rayn scumslipped. the way this is treated is nonsensical from a town point of view. if you think you found a scumslip you should go for the throat. like, it doesn't matter that this makes no sense, i've thought things were scumslips before that turned out not to be. but the way it's put across doesn't make any sense from a town point of view. either he's just saying things for the sake of saying them or he's throwing out a "scumslip" to see who bites. do not want. | ||
|
strongandbig
United States4858 Posts
On May 13 2013 22:55 Oatsmaster wrote: Lets get a wagon rolling ##Vote: WaveofShadow i mean then there's this | ||
|
strongandbig
United States4858 Posts
On May 13 2013 23:38 Oatsmaster wrote: I say we lynch him for this really fucking bad attitude and promises that he is giving. I dont like promises. and we return to the single worst post in the thread. so @sloosh's question from above i'll look at the other dudes in a minute but my thoughts on oatsmaster are no gusta. | ||
|
strongandbig
United States4858 Posts
this post is needlessly aggro, doesn't really make sense given his position. On May 14 2013 00:42 WaveofShadow wrote: I'm bored with your lessons and you telling me how to play. I haven't had the time to do much game analysis yet but I will. Expect it later. I've said these things before and I'll say them again: I never lie, and I don't respond to threats. If you and everyone else would rather lynch me first then go ahead by all means. this is a good argument by prome On May 13 2013 17:09 Promethelax wrote: If you are town there is exactly one thing to make of this. Stating it like this is much more of a 'look I'm townie too' gesture than a 'interesting we agree on everything, I find you town' post should be. WoS doesn't even develop a read on BH, as town your goal should be to discern everyone's alignment but he is not trying to read bh, just telling him that they share thoughts. however i'm not sure that i like bh's reason for voting wos On May 13 2013 18:06 Blazinghand wrote: lol wut OK real talk you can't go and say "that's s post s newbie would make" and also be like "also he has been worthless" and also be like "but let's not lynch him' WoS is no Marvellosity but hes no kushm4sta either. there's a pretty obvious explanation to his post there: blatant attempt to buddy me and hide in the shadow of my analysis. his isn't a post that helps town or hunts scum. he's just trying to blend in. there's an easy solution to that. ##vote WoS i cant tell whether the bolded part is serious or bh ego-ing as usual. but on the other hand, when people try and buddy bh if he's egoing he usually is all like 'yesssss buddy me you fools' but i dont really like that bh is all like 'my analysis brings all the boys to the yard' but then doesn't really analisysify other than just being like "yeah prome i vote for that thing" roundabout way of saying i'm not convinced by bh's reason for voting. On May 14 2013 00:08 VisceraEyes wrote: No he's scum for not giving a shit about helping town. He's scum for jokingly claiming scum when called out by a player who has the clout to get him lynched. The "stank" I'm referring to is a confidence, an inner strength in his posting...a singular point in his favor that is overshadowed by his unwillingness to help town by playing in a transparent and open way. Plus he claimed scum - it doesn't get much easier than that Oats. on the other hand i kinda like this better. although maybe i'm being influenced by the fact that oatsmaster didnt like this post. but the argument "he didn't respond to kita except jokingly makes it seem like he knew he could kill kita and not have to worry about his suspicions" and "hes blatantly not trying to help town" are reasons i find way more compelling than "he buddied me in this one post". overall, looking at his filter it looks pretty bad, but i'm not persuaded much by the reasons people gave for voting him except for VE, and i think oatsmaster's vote was the worst. like he's not playing like a townie but plenty of townies dont do that. the kita thing is the strongest argument against him imo. i would call him suspicious but im not yet near the voting for him threshold and i think oatsmaster looks worse. | ||
|
strongandbig
United States4858 Posts
On May 14 2013 01:28 VayneAuthority wrote: recall that I played in this game http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/viewmessage.php?topic_id=67925 so I dont see how its hilarious, I know about big games. You will just never see me as a guy going back looking through the thread, I read it as the thread develops and make my opinions from that and take care not to second guess myself. As I said I am baffled by the DP kill, I have nothing to comment on that besides my theory that mafia thought he was hiding a PR role behind his claim, but no leads on to who that could make mafia Joined TL.net Thursday, 18th of October 2012 PBU or very well-prepared smurf? | ||
|
strongandbig
United States4858 Posts
| ||
| ||
